- 20,060
- 10,840
@Marco So him disagreeing with Roy being stronger automatically means harassment?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports - 16
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- Status
- 8,675
- 5,559
Stronger than Holy Weapons doesn't mean it's 100 times stronger.
- 539
- 10
Not at all, i am complaining that he used his reasoning (Without doing a content revision thread, he did it like his word is absolute law) to close MY threads, and then act rudely against me when i asked him about it
and without even telling me about it!
Isnt that disrespectful? I think that is you want to enforce a thread down by being a stomp when the content moderator already has his point of view as a rule?
I think that is pretty unfair for the users in this community. He should make a content revision thread to come clean.
and without even telling me about it!
Isnt that disrespectful? I think that is you want to enforce a thread down by being a stomp when the content moderator already has his point of view as a rule?
I think that is pretty unfair for the users in this community. He should make a content revision thread to come clean.
- 20,060
- 10,840
You mean reasons that people posted in YOUR thread, saying that it was a massive AP stomp? Also you not knowing about the messages is ridiculous since everyone in this wiki gets notifications on any thread they follow.
- 539
- 10
Well, it is an unknown factor.
It is as ridiculous to claim it is just as strong at one of them than saying its a million times stronger!
I would like him to make a content revision thread and stop harrasing the users of this community by imposing his point of view into something as varied as the tiering of a high 6-A character.
Also, i might suspect that chosing the lower end of a calc when the calc itself claims the higher end is far more likely...is a sign of intentional downplaying.
Proof: https://web.archive.org/web/2016050...ry-weapons-of-elibe-amp-ashunera-feats.26407/
It is as ridiculous to claim it is just as strong at one of them than saying its a million times stronger!
I would like him to make a content revision thread and stop harrasing the users of this community by imposing his point of view into something as varied as the tiering of a high 6-A character.
Also, i might suspect that chosing the lower end of a calc when the calc itself claims the higher end is far more likely...is a sign of intentional downplaying.
Proof: https://web.archive.org/web/2016050...ry-weapons-of-elibe-amp-ashunera-feats.26407/
- 8,675
- 5,559
It's also just as ridiculous to say that it's a hundred times stronger. Even the high-end gets stomped anyways
It's not harassment and there's no need for a content revision when it comes to calc low-ends that are the same tier anyways. Take it up with him instead of wasting all of our time on this thread.
It's not harassment and there's no need for a content revision when it comes to calc low-ends that are the same tier anyways. Take it up with him instead of wasting all of our time on this thread.
- 3,706
- 315
I don't think even if he was downplaying that it would necessarily be report worthy or an actual reason to say he induces fear into you be his appearance.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #53
- 61,177
- 14,747
How long of a block?
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #55
@WeeklyBattles
I blocked Skeleturtle for 3 months, given that it seemed to be part of a pattern.
@Joseph619
You have a good point. However, the offence is somewhat mitigated by that he does not seem to understand our conventions regarding this, so I am not sure how long a block that would be necessary.
I blocked Skeleturtle for 3 months, given that it seemed to be part of a pattern.
@Joseph619
You have a good point. However, the offence is somewhat mitigated by that he does not seem to understand our conventions regarding this, so I am not sure how long a block that would be necessary.
- 2,716
- 169
I was being extremely lenient too. A month's block also seems too lenient for this stuff, I was trying to be soft because you said he was clueless. We have banned vandals for a longer duration for much less.
I would prefer 3 months personally. Although I wouldn't mind a stricter ban. This sort of things forces the staff to lock up pages for sensible and regular members, forcing them to unlock pages for good edits.
I would prefer 3 months personally. Although I wouldn't mind a stricter ban. This sort of things forces the staff to lock up pages for sensible and regular members, forcing them to unlock pages for good edits.
- 539
- 10
Fine then, i apologize.
I hope neither JSW or Medeus takes it against me.
I hope neither JSW or Medeus takes it against me.
- 15,332
- 7,563
It's fine, Marco.
- 5,107
- 1,786
Kepwakusoyarou needs to be blocked.
He is already banned from the wiki on other accounts due to chat behavior and insulting staff and wiki.
He is already banned from the wiki on other accounts due to chat behavior and insulting staff and wiki.
- 2,601
- 83
^ also, do a IP check, they also share the same IP
- 2,335
- 1,005
IPs are changed routinely by service providers. It is not a concrete judgement of a sock puppet. I rather us take a light chance than be too exclusive. This is coming from an IT Security & Routing major so, please take my advice seriously.
- 15,332
- 7,563
I agree that jumping at innocent bystanders and harassing them is not only egregious, but a warning-worthy offence in itself.
...However, I have to point out he does have a strange username. The last part of his username is "Kuso-yarou", which, according to this site, is japanese for "[shithole". Other sites have it at "asshole", "f****** c**", but you get the idea.
Seems like a potential coincidence, but I thought I'd point out. It's probably not intentional, but youd have to ask him.
...However, I have to point out he does have a strange username. The last part of his username is "Kuso-yarou", which, according to this site, is japanese for "[shithole". Other sites have it at "asshole", "f****** c**", but you get the idea.
Seems like a potential coincidence, but I thought I'd point out. It's probably not intentional, but youd have to ask him.
- 15,332
- 7,563
If this is that guy again...
I'm not sure, but he's becoming even more annoying than Jonathan at this point.
I'm not sure, but he's becoming even more annoying than Jonathan at this point.
- 2,335
- 1,005
@Kep
Hop wouldn't know about that.
@Ant
However, it would be a poor moral choice to make the conclusion that his IP being the same as a previous user (who likely is on a whole other address or provider), should never be a damning indicatiion that the user in question is a sockpuppet, without good reason. And reason such as time, name, and obviously suspsicious behavior.
MIght I also point out most providers and juristictions universally consider it a violation to view public IP addresses?
Hop wouldn't know about that.
@Ant
However, it would be a poor moral choice to make the conclusion that his IP being the same as a previous user (who likely is on a whole other address or provider), should never be a damning indicatiion that the user in question is a sockpuppet, without good reason. And reason such as time, name, and obviously suspsicious behavior.
MIght I also point out most providers and juristictions universally consider it a violation to view public IP addresses?
- 5,107
- 1,786
@Ant - While I did unnecessarily jump the gun at accusing him of being another user, his name did have a potential vulgar word in it (similar to last time, 2 days ago), and his name's start and his mannerisms in chat have been very identical to the person I speak of.
@Kepekley - I apologize for acting out rashly, but I am still suspicious of him.
@Kepekley - I apologize for acting out rashly, but I am still suspicious of him.
- 15,332
- 7,563
His name could be indicative of a grudge against me. If he mentioned anything about Dragon Ball Z battleboards, it'd probably be him.
For now, I think we should leave him be.
For now, I think we should leave him be.
- 3,706
- 315
I mean, there is a user here with the name Ahegao-chan.
- 32,358
- 20,298
Not comparable.
"Kep wa kusoyarou" is literally "Kep is an asshole" in Japanese.
"Kep wa kusoyarou" is literally "Kep is an asshole" in Japanese.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Don't know how the hell I didn't notice that.
Seems like a blatant sock. This guy doesn't give up.
Seems like a blatant sock. This guy doesn't give up.
- 8,438
- 3,293
- 5,107
- 1,786
@Matthew - Thanks for catching that. I tried to put "Wakuso yarou" on multiple translators, but they all translated to gibberish or "Let's go home".
It seems to be the same person as 2 days ago. The account Kepwakusoyarou was made early today after the previous account was banned less than 24 hours before. This really does speak for itself. steals back my apology
It seems to be the same person as 2 days ago. The account Kepwakusoyarou was made early today after the previous account was banned less than 24 hours before. This really does speak for itself. steals back my apology
- 15,332
- 7,563
- Status
Similar threads
