• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports - 14

Status
Not open for further replies.
The reason why I said I was "trolling" (everyone saw through this) was because I didn't want to be a dick and report you. I'd feel bad if i did that.

However, I won't tolerate people trying to get me removed from this site without a reason. I offered several times to drop the discussion, and you continued.

And when KinkiestSins agreed with me, you told him he was butting in.

You also said that anyone who couldn't overpower their own mother was "very weak".

And lastly, you called me a white knight for not liking your posts.
 
'Aside from that, if you're claiming that the 'joke' you made on the chat wasn't serious, then why are you still rustled by him calling you sexist over that joke?'

bc someone trolling me, calling me sexist is extremely serious.

'I SPECIFICALLYsaid to everyone drop the topic down'

and i did. kepekley mentioned that i reported him and said he 'would go all out' on me and i responded, then you kicked me for that.
 
@Kuularne

Look. Personally I wouldn't have thought the joke was that bad. Is it sexist? Yes. Is it a joke? Yes.

But you can't get all uptight and in a knot when someone calls you sexist over a sexist joke. Just say "it's a joke" and then move on. But you took being called sexist SO SERIOUSLY you had to come here, even though what you said WAS sexist, joke or not.

If you want to make offensive jokes, get some balls and learn to deal with a little accusation. Grow up, get over it, say "it's a joke" and move on with your day. If being called sexist is such a greivous offense to you, how about you... I don't know... don't make a sexist joke? I think that would probably fix the problem.
 
Because you brought it up again, and i told everyone that i will kick anyone as a warning if someone mentionned the topic again, which you did.
 
and i did. kepekley mentioned that i reported him and said he 'would go all out' on me and i responded, then you kicked me for that.

This is false. He said he'd kick anyone who kept bringing up the topic again. Everyone recognized this, and we all dropped it. He kicked you for bringing up the topic after we all agreed to drop it, not because he was "helping" me like your comment implies with that wording.

Now you're involving a bystander on this.
 
I don't think he deserves a Ban but a warning, if he wants to make a sexist joke he should deal with the backlash, simple as that. if I made a racist joke regardless if my intentions were to be racist or not and someone called me racist I have no right to complain about when I'm the one that came off racist, all you would need to do is clarify yourself and move on.
 
Kepekley23 said:
I kind of feel bad.

I really didn't want it to escalate this bad. Hope you guys don't hate me for that.
Click to expand...
You did nothing wrong. You only defended yourself from lies made by Kuu
 
I think that we need to ban him again. The "joke" may not have been very offensive, but he keeps repeatedly spamming this thread, which prevents us from dealing wih more important matters. Basically, he is argumentative, unreasonable, too young to have necessary maturity to understand how to behave, and continues to constantly waste the staff's time.
 
Come to think of it, at the end of the day, Kuularne is just a kid who gets too defensive when people call him out. He doesn't know any better, but I think he can eventually learn to contribute. Banning a kid for not knowing any better makes me feel a little bad, anyway.

Should we reconsider it or just drop it?
 
I do not like it either, but we cannot constantly waste time on and indulge him. The stability of the wiki is most important.
 
It seems to be a borderline case, but I do not mind if somebody gives him a warning to be more respectful.
 
He does not deserve no warning he is here constantly annoy the site and his users/admins, i already banned him once for his behaviour.
 
Okay, feel free to block him then.
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Misterheightma

As I said WAAY above, I'd keep an eye on this guy. He PM'd Ryukama on the JBW asking why he was autoblocked, and PMing a bureaucrat to ask why he is autoblocked is something Jonathan does in literally every single sock he creates.

Not only that, but his first comment was in an OPM revision. His grammar is also similar to Jonathan's.

Overall, I think we should watch this one.
 
Jonathan recently PMed me on the Marvel wiki, apologised for behaving in an insane manner, and told me that he was very depressed, and that the VS Battles wiki was the only thing that he had to cheer him up.

I feel kind of bad for him if that is true, but he has caused a lot of problems here (including likely uploading a lot of pornography in my name, as anybody can see with a Google search), and we have our strict standards of conduct.
 
@Ant

The problem is that he's done this routine before, apologized nicely before going on a screaming tirade again once we disagree with him.

I don't like the idea of him coming back to the wiki.
 
Yes, he should definitely remain banned. We cannot make exceptions for these levels of transgressions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
30 31 32
Replies
1K
Views
93K
Comiphorous
Comiphorous
A minor addition about discussion rules
Replies
4
Views
750
Deleted member 40688
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
19
Views
1K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
Mr. Bambu
  • Locked
Slight Adjustment to Rules Regarding Original Works
2 3
Replies
80
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top