• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Resistance negation vs layers

Fezzih_007

He/Him
Messages
7,776
Reaction score
2,893
Does resistance negation Works against people who have layered resistance?

Like, If the person A have Soul Manipulation resistance 5 layers, and Person B have resistance negation to Soul Manipulation, It would bypass It?

I just asking for a match
 
Layers just mean the hax or resistances in question have higher potency, allow them them to hax someone with lower resistance potency or resist hax of lower potency, however resistance negation mean you nullifies/bypass resistance altogether, make resistance itself useless, thus if you have no resistance against resistance negation then you get haxed no matter what, layers are meaningless

For comparison, it is similar to Durability Negation, normally you can overcome durability simply by being stronger in AP, however, Dura Neg mean you nullifies, ignore durability altogether, thus make durability itself useless, so how strong your durability isn't matter if you don't have resistance to dura neg
 
Hello but could resistance negation negate someone's resists to temperature? Like character A who can resist the heat of the sun gets resist negated to the point they die to normal fire?
 
Hello but could resistance negation negate someone's resists to temperature? Like character A who can resist the heat of the sun gets resist negated to the point they die to normal fire?
Normally Resistance Negation is based on an attack that bypasses resistances, not directly removing someone's resistances from them. But if someone did have the ability to remove resistance from a person, then yes, even someone who can resist the temperature of the sun would be burned by fire.
 
Normally Resistance Negation is based on an attack that bypasses resistances, not directly removing someone's resistances from them. But if someone did have the ability to remove resistance from a person, then yes, even someone who can resist the temperature of the sun would be burned by fire.
Ok so would like Akainu who has resistance negation can negate Lille barro's resistance to high temperature of the sun? To the point Lille dies to Akainu's heat of magma
 
I don't know why Akainu's profile has Resistance Negation, since the ability isn't on his profile.
 
Bro, this has a lot of potential to become a loop hole... So getting into the subject, let's say:

Character A has resistance to Soul Manipulation in layers, but character B has Resistance Negation, however Character A has Resistance to Resistance Negation in multiple Layers, but Character B has Negation to Resistance to Resistence Negation... Like would this work?
 
Character A has resistance to Soul Manipulation in layers, but character B has Resistance Negation, however Character A has Resistance to Resistance Negation in multiple Layers, but Character B has Negation to Resistance to Resistence Negation... Like would this work?
It's not so complex, looking at it plainly will always show what wins. Resistance < Negation < Resistance to Negation < Negation of Resistance to Negation, and so on.
 
It's not so complex, looking at it plainly will always show what wins. Resistance < Negation < Resistance to Negation < Negation of Resistance to Negation, and so on.
Hmm, does this mean that if this is repeated enough times, no one will be able to resist the hax? The type capable of destroying everyone who isn't from a higher dimension? Hmmm... This means that the OCs I created as a child are capable of doing some serious damage
 
It's not really explained in detail on the page, so I can't really say. Resistance Negation is a bit case by case. Just because you can bypass someone's resistance to blunt-force attacks, doesn't mean you can bypass another person's Conceptual Resistances.
Well back to the original question. Could Akainu negate someone's resist to high temperature like perhaps as hot as the sun? He can resist negate someone's temperature to magma level however
 
Well back to the original question. Could Akainu negate someone's resist to high temperature like perhaps as hot as the sun? He can resist negate someone's temperature to magma level however
Depends on where the resistance comes from. For example, bypassing someone's Resistance to something by negating their Devil Fruit's power is different than bypassing something that is physically structured to survive extreme temperatures.

One requires a bit of power nullification, the other has no powers to nullify at all, it's an inherent property.
 
Depends on where the resistance comes from. For example, bypassing someone's Resistance to something by negating their Devil Fruit's power is different than bypassing something that is physically structured to survive extreme temperatures.

One requires a bit of power nullification, the other has no powers to nullify at all, it's an inherent property.
Hm so could Akainu negate Lille's resists? Lille gain his resists of temperature by activating his blunt
 
Ok so would like Akainu who has resistance negation can negate Lille barro's resistance to high temperature of the sun? To the point Lille dies to Akainu's heat of magma
"Devil Fruit abilities (Buso Haki has been stated to be able to block devil fruit abilities,[57] seen when Doflamingo blocked Trafalgar Law's Amputate[58] and when Trafalgar Law stated that his Shambles ability would not work against those with superior Buso to him[59])
Heat Manipulation (Sanji states that Buso assists him in withstanding heat[60])
Resistance Negation (Users with superior Buso can resist the affects of Haki negating their resistances, shown with Gear 4th Luffy negating Doflamingo's negation of Luffy's resistance to physical attacks[37])"

One Piece res neg involves buso slop, nullifying devil fruit stuff, etc based on what's actually written out on the various profiles.
This, does not enable them to just negate any resistance ever, it's situational, circumstantial, and involves an energy system of sorts. Akainu wouldn't be able to just negate Superman's heat res for example, because the reason he has that resistance has absolutely nothing to do with the mechanics of how Haki can mitigate someone's resistance to begin with.

Context is key, mechanics and details matter, literally just use common sense and ask yourself how stuff works instead of just taking the title of an ability at face value.
 
"Devil Fruit abilities (Buso Haki has been stated to be able to block devil fruit abilities,[57] seen when Doflamingo blocked Trafalgar Law's Amputate[58] and when Trafalgar Law stated that his Shambles ability would not work against those with superior Buso to him[59])
Heat Manipulation (Sanji states that Buso assists him in withstanding heat[60])
Resistance Negation (Users with superior Buso can resist the affects of Haki negating their resistances, shown with Gear 4th Luffy negating Doflamingo's negation of Luffy's resistance to physical attacks[37])"

One Piece res neg involves buso slop, nullifying devil fruit stuff, etc based on what's actually written out on the various profiles.
This, does not enable them to just negate any resistance ever, it's situational, circumstantial, and involves an energy system of sorts. Akainu wouldn't be able to just negate Superman's heat res for example, because the reason he has that resistance has absolutely nothing to do with the mechanics of how Haki can mitigate someone's resistance to begin with.

Context is key, mechanics and details matter, literally just use common sense and ask yourself how stuff works instead of just taking the title of an ability at face value.
So resist negate in OP is limited?
 
So resist negate in OP is limited?
No? It just works based on the mechanics it shown to and effects things it's shown to (or similar things, within reason)?

"Limited" in wiki terms is for like actual specific hard limits or things riddled with caveats. An example would be, Dio or Jotaro's Resistance to Time Stop is Limited because 1. While they can see and think in it, they can not move. 2. In order to move they must expend their own Time Stop, once it runs out, they can no longer move again till time stop ends.

That is limited, there's a hard caveat and limitations to it beyond just "feats".
 
It's not really explained in detail on the page, so I can't really say. Resistance Negation is a bit case by case. Just because you can bypass someone's resistance to blunt-force attacks, doesn't mean you can bypass another person's Conceptual Resistances.
Haki also grants the ability to negate heat resistances. Ace did it to Whitebeard. The question is that since Haki has shown the ability to negate heat resistances, would it be able to negate the resistance of someone who can resist temperatures as high as the sun.
 
One Piece res neg involves buso slop, nullifying devil fruit stuff, etc based on what's actually written out on the various profiles.
Except it doesn't as I've explained in the thread, Ace's haki negated Whitebeard's natural resistance. I don't know why you're blatantly ignoring this.
 
Except it doesn't as I've explained in the thread, Ace's haki negated Whitebeard's natural resistance. I don't know why you're blatantly ignoring this.
You explained very, very, very badly, dipped upon being asked, and the sources on the page don't elaborate and in fact say the opposite.
 
You explained very, very, very badly, dipped upon being asked, and the sources on the page don't elaborate and in fact say the opposite.
I dipped upon you saying that the ability does not exist after I told you it does. I did not explain badly. Ace's haki negated Whitebeard's natural resistance and burned his hand when before his haki training he was unable to. His flames did not get hotter as it was only his haki that was stated to have gotten stronger and it was his haki that was emphasized.
 
I dipped upon you saying that the ability does not exist after I told you it does.
Simply saying thing and then being asked for citation isn't explaining.
I did not explain badly.
Failure to like, actually elaborate, explain why, not even give source when asked is pretty bad.
Ace's haki negated Whitebeard's natural resistance and burned his hand when before his haki training he was unable to.
That is cool. That doesn't actually answer the question.
His flames did not get hotter as it was only his haki that was stated to have gotten stronger and it was his haki that was emphasized.
That is cool. That does not answer the question.

Like case and point, doing it again, "Ace negated natural resistance", why is it natural resistance? You're just doing it again, and if so why isn't this actually elaborated upon on a single profile with literally not that being the case?

The profiles very clearly implicate all this as being a haki/buso thing, why assume any different for Whitebeard?
 
Like case and point, doing it again, "Ace negated natural resistance", why is it natural resistance? You're just doing it again, and if so why isn't this actually elaborated upon on a single profile with literally not that being the case?

The profiles very clearly implicate all this as being a haki/buso thing, why assume any different for Whitebeard?
Because he was not using Buso?? It was his bare hand. After training in Haki with specifically focusing on Buso, he was able to negate the natural resistance of Whitebeard's hand, and then it eventually grew even stronger to where Ace's Buso-coated flames could stop Whitebeard's movements and forced him to use his own Buso to resist them.
 
Literally what? Nowhere, in any of that, does it implicate resistance negation by negating a natural resistance.
It legit just looks like Ace himself got stronger due to training, forcing Whitebeard to like, try ever so slightly? Which, yeah, getting stronger would do that? He didn't even end up burning him anyway (Well, to a degree you'd expect if his resistance was negated? His flame's 10000s of degrees yeah?). Unless the resistance negation in question is so miniscule it doesn't even effect much? But that's still assuming that over the other, imo, more obvious interpretation.

That isn't getting into the fact the resistance negation on the actual page doesn't cite those from what I can see, and Whitebeard's own page literally using Ace as an example of WHY he has heat res, Akainu too (While also saying he also ended up with fatal burns? Which like, yeah still heat res given it's 25,000c but the res neggin in question?), all while the actual pages detailing heat res, res neg, the sources of resistances, etc all talk about not innate physiological slop?

Like idk what you expect from me, what you're saying and what the scans implicate and what's stated on the profiles are not the same. I'd just have to take your word at this point.
 
It legit just looks like Ace himself got stronger due to training, forcing Whitebeard to like, try ever so slightly?
His Haki was explicitly the reason why his flames burned Whitebeard. Strength has nothing to do with the attacks capability to burn.
 
His Haki was explicitly the reason why his flames burned Whitebeard. Strength has nothing to do with the attacks capability to burn.
The page covers the fact he was training multiple things, including his flames. From what I'm actually seeing reading them, he just trained in all facets and got stronger? "Explicitly" doesn't work when the page where he barely scorches his hand, mentions at least 3-4 training sequences 🗿

I'm going to also ignore the fact that we've been arguing about res neg that negs resistance to the point it like, is essentially negligible? If Ace actually negated the resistance he'd have been evaporated. Going to ignore the fact that's the type of shit we slap "minor" on.

I'm also gonna ignore how this isn't cited as res neg on the profiles, and how the profiles somehwat contradict that line of thinking but whatever.
 
Uh, idk much about what you guys talking, but, you seriously do not ne resistance neg to burn someone who can resist getting burned, by burning them at higher degree than the level they can withstand
 
The page covers the fact he was training multiple things, including his flames. From what I'm actually seeing reading them, he just trained in all facets and got stronger? "Explicitly" doesn't work when the page where he barely scorches his hand, mentions at least 3-4 training sequences 🗿

I'm going to also ignore the fact that we've been arguing about res neg that negs resistance to the point it like, is essentially negligible? If Ace actually negated the resistance he'd have been evaporated. Going to ignore the fact that's the type of shit we slap "minor" on.

I'm also gonna ignore how this isn't cited as res neg on the profiles, and how the profiles somehwat contradict that line of thinking but whatever.
Thatch quite literally said that Ace was focusing too much on Buso and that he needed to train his Kenbun more:



And when he burned Whitebeard we see Ace's Buso sparks which weren't there before. It's clearly his Buso that negated Whitebeard's resistance. This is accepted which is one of the reasons why Haki is listed as generally having Resistance Negation. No point in debating this.
 
Wait, hold it right there @Kachon123 bro, i think these kind of discussion needed to be in a CRT, the OP's question was already answered, since at this point, we are talking about specific content of a verse that could get changed, which should be in a CRT instead
 
Thatch quite literally said that Ace was focusing too much on Buso and that he needed to train his Kenbun more:


Yeah? That doesn't mean he didn't train other stuff?
And when he burned Whitebeard we see Ace's Buso sparks which weren't there before. It's clearly his Buso that negated Whitebeard's resistance.
In that exact same page, it also callsback to training his flame control, and two other points that factor into that instance, at least.

Obviously, if he trained Buso, Buso is gonna be drawn too, that doesn't actually change the fact it isn't stated and in fact multiple points are implicated.
This is accepted which is one of the reasons why Haki is listed as generally having Resistance Negation.
It literally isn't cited from I can see at all on the Resistance Negation section of the Haki profile. Not only that, it isn't cited as res neg on Ace's profile either.
No point in debating this.
Well, I literally am? I don't think the evidence is sufficient to say it concretely, especially as it'd be so utterly negligible an instance I wouldn't even call it res neg to begin with, it'd be an extreme "minor" if he DID do it solely based on buso, and solely on Whitebeard's own innate one. All while all our profiles don't actually elaborate on that and eevn seemingly give contradictory explanations?
 
Wait, hold it right there @Kachon123 bro, i think these kind of discussion needed to be in a CRT, the OP's question was already answered, since at this point, we are talking about specific content of a verse that could get changed, which should be in a CRT instead
I'm answering @Johner2133451's question. Haki negates heat resistance, meaning that he can negate Lille's resistance, as @ActuallySpaceMan42 also said.
 
In that exact same page, it also callsback to training his flame control, and two other points that factor into that instance, at least.
Flame control ≠ Flame temperature. Ace has never shown that his flames became hotter.
 
I'm answering @Johner2133451's question. Haki negates heat resistance, meaning that he can negate Lille's resistance, as @ActuallySpaceMan42 also said.
He didn't even negate Whitebeard's properly, if he negated it completely, he'd have been vaporized.
Flame control ≠ Flame temperature. Ace has never shown that his flames became hotter.
Except here given that's a pretty blatant interpretation that can be taken and the fact such a thing was factored into that very scene means buso sparks wasn't the sole reason why he managed to get Whitebeard to respond properly as if it WAS the case, then even talking about how he trained his flames in anyway at all would be actively detrimental to the scene and cause active confusion and be misleading.

You are taking it solely to be a Buso thing. The page references 4 different facets including training of his flames as why the outcome changed and he got burned. This is just a fact.
 
He didn't even negate Whitebeard's properly, if he negated it completely, he'd have been vaporized.
Which is why he used his Devil Fruit to knock Ace away before it became an issue. His entire hand was completely scorched for the short amount of time Ace's Haki came into contact with Whitebeard.
Except here given that's a pretty blatant interpretation that can be taken and the fact such a thing was factored into that very scene means buso sparks wasn't the sole reason why he managed to get Whitebeard to respond properly as if it WAS the case, then even talking about how he trained his flames in anyway at all would be actively detrimental to the scene and cause active confusion and be misleading.

You are taking it solely to be a Buso thing. The page references 4 different facets including training of his flames as why the outcome changed and he got burned. This is just a fact.
My guy, his training regarding his flames particularly was to use them to accelerate his feet so that he can hit harder and pairing it together with his Kenbun Haki to confuse Whitebeard. He trained those two and then he trained his Buso on top of that. Those were the only trainings that were pointed out. Any claim that he trained the heat of his flames is headcanon.
 
Back
Top