- 18,393
- 14,323
3 agreements and 1 disagreement; and no, 3 agreements in less than an hour is hardly a record on the wiki.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
3 agreements and 1 disagreement; and no, 3 agreements in less than an hour is hardly a record on the wiki.
The rule as written is predicated on asserting that because the realms are contextually planets, no one should try to upgrade them. Which the assertion that the rule bases itself on has been proven false as per the OP. Hence why I want it removed.I thought the rule was made to specifiy that the evidence brought forth in the past wasn't enough to assume the scans ment universal in context at certain points in the story, not that they didn't mean universal as a general "fact". Honestly, if no one is using those past arguments to do a buff, I don't see an issue with the rule's removal. Pretty sure everyone on the Bleach scene knows not to try again until they find something new, unless there have been threads I've not been aware of where someone keeps trying?
Mind linking the thread that has been discussed earlier with the same shreds of evidence that OP has presented?This piece of info hardly changes anything. This is not the sole reason, as there were multiple points in support for the decision of treating them as planets, many of them being directly referring to them as planets. And this piece of info is inconsequential because the interpretation is incorrect. Surely we have discussed it earlier. The comparison is not literal because garganta is not outer space. It also does not mean that those are not planets.
Hard disagree here. We are just back to discussing the same thing without any new groundbreaking info. This particular statement is neither enough to prove anything nor enough to disprove anything.
It probably was an ignored evidence. Which we know happens.This statement from the novel was definitely known about at the time that the rule was created.
I quite literally explain how the realms cannot be planets. You asserting they are does not refute this whatsoever. The narrator’s objective description > your subjective interpretation.This piece of info hardly changes anything. This is not the sole reason, as there were multiple points in support for the decision of treating them as planets, many of them being directly referring to them as planets. And this piece of info is inconsequential because the interpretation is incorrect. Surely we have discussed it earlier. The comparison is not literal because garganta is not outer space. It also does not mean that those are not planets.
Hard disagree here. We are just back to discussing the same thing without any new groundbreaking info. This particular statement is neither enough to prove anything nor enough to disprove anything.
Boom Dread is losing yet another CRTMind linking the thread that has been discussed earlier with the same shreds of evidence that OP has presented?
You don’t need to participate in the the debate even if it is created. The fact that a false rule will be created in other to stop debate is absolutely disingenuous and bad. If there is a good reason to keep the rule yes but not because you can’t allow yhwach be 3A and low 2-c then you lie.I mean I don't care if the rule is removed, but I can only give a crap about this same song and dance so many times
Like are we really gonna get another goddamn CRT that goes over how Yhwach and the Soul King are actually 3-A to Low 2-C again? Cause I will not participate in that same exact debate again...
Honestly, suppose the existence of this discussion rule was the consequence of not creating such a debate or upgrade. In that case, there will be an antithetical debate or upgrade if the rule gets removed and is not the same as you are referring to. Did you understand the point of getting rid of the rule?-I mean, sure, get rid of the rule, but you're just going to have the same debate and if it's not settled, another rule will be put in place...
Oh alright, then. Thanks for the clarification.I should clarify that I agree with removing the rule in general
What happens after that is irrelevant of the fact that I believe the rule is fine to remove
The garganta is compared to outer space.This piece of info hardly changes anything. This is not the sole reason, as there were multiple points in support for the decision of treating them as planets, many of them being directly referring to them as planets. And this piece of info is inconsequential because the interpretation is incorrect. Surely we have discussed it earlier. The comparison is not literal because garganta is not outer space. It also does not mean that those are not planets.
Hard disagree here. We are just back to discussing the same thing without any new groundbreaking info. This particular statement is neither enough to prove anything nor enough to disprove anything.
The issue being when Yhwach said he was going to destroy them, it wasn't said that he would destroy the realms themselves with his attack when it was shown that his power was only targetting the planet around him.
I will be fine if the rule is ammended to remove that line in particular if that bit of "false information" is the only actual point of contention.
That’s your prerogative man, Arcker just wanted to voice some thoughts in response to this thread and I told him I’d share em, but no im not offended lol@Arc7Kuroi; I hope you will not be offended if I do not address or acknowledge a post from a banned user.
^^This seems more reasonable than circling around with same Arguments. Also i don't see damage bringing anything new. No offense don't take me wrong.I think 3 staff members have agreed at far. Can this be implemented tho?
No to this atm. This rule removal only implies that the realms aren’t planets, it doesn’t imply anything else.it is just to make clear the universe is actually a universe.
You want it applied after 50 minutes of discussion?
Is that a record for rushing a CRT?
Thanks you can close this thread thenI updated the discussion rules page.