- 63,529
- 8,507
No it's NNT As well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't Masadaverse have those stories take place in the same greater cosmology, hence the shared verse page? I think that makes its situation disanalagous.Ionliosite said:And Masadaverse, that one also uses cross verse scaling between Reinhard and Amakasu.
Masada gets affected because it uses cross verse scaling (Shinza and Senshinkan are totally unrelated after all). And if it is inconsistent, it gets yeeted, yes. Rein's statement is basically identical to Mob's (same sole author, consistent with the scaling), so both get the same treatment aka just adding a "likely higher" with the statement there. NNT's statement, on the other hand, gets yeeted.Tony di bugalu said:Since you said Masada was affected by this and up there people said that if it is inconsistent it gets yeeted
Secondary.TheUpgradeManHaHaxD said:are WoG statements considered primary, secondary, or teritary statements by this wiki's standards??
Wait, so Mob is becoming 7-AIonliosite said:Masada gets affected because it uses cross verse scaling (Shinza and Senshinkan are totally unrelated after all). And if it is inconsistent, it gets yeeted, yes. Rein's statement is basically identical to Mob's (same sole author, consistent with the scaling), so both get the same treatment aka just adding a "likely higher" with the statement there. NNT's statement, on the other hand, gets yeeted.Tony di bugalu said:Since you said Masada was affected by this and up there people said that if it is inconsistent it gets yeeted
I dunno, we seem to do that all the time, yet when the actual people who made it do it, it's suddenly a big dealI'm Blue daba dee daba die said:I agree with the fact that we should not cross verse scale
I mean, how can you say X character is comparable to Y character if Y character doesn't even exist in their verse
There's still Tatsu scaling to Shigeo's speed.Ionliosite said:Yeah, both would become 6-C without scaling to each other, so we would actually be able to remove the statement and have them as comparable anyway. What a nice ending.
Exactly. This shit is just lazy.LSirLancelotDuLacl said:So what you are saying is that other bad cases of this should bring down a consistent use of cross verse scaling.
How about proper care is given to said cases that are actually wrong, instead of this? If they are actually wrong.
THIS, this is the problem. Accepting these two, that actually have a lot reasons to scale, led to others cases of cross-verse scaling because these two had it, that's why this is a slippery slope. It'll be a massive double standard to make this case keep the cross-scaling while others are removed.Tetsucabrah said:I'm sure there are examples of bad cross scaling on this site, but these two are pretty consistent.
That's odd. Still, sending him a link would be for the best as this is about a general standard. I should try to send him one just in case.Agnaa said:One, someone should show Dargoo this. He was the one to make the upgrade and argue against this, it seems odd to have this discussion without his knowledge.
Dargoo hasn't participated in many threads involving upgrades he's started, as of recent.
"Take it on case by case basis" is the argument thrown when doesn't want to discuss the subject at first hand. We have to be consistent, we can't magically this case a special threatment but get rid of everything else. Mob and Tatsu started the slippery slope, because of their scaling is that all other cross-verse scaling problem start, everything single thread on the subject uses the "Mon and Tatsumaki are accepted to scale" as an argument to cross-scale. We need to stop scaling these two, and thus all othe problems die with them.Tetsucabrah said:That is such a stupid way of thinking about this. Take it on a case by case basis.