• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Regarding Characters who can kill Nonexistent Beings

Dragonmasterxyz

VS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Retired
33,408
8,430
So we have many verses where we have characters who can kill beings labeled as nonexistent beings. However, I have noticed that we have never actually stated this on many files. As such we should likely add "Can kill nonexistent beings" to those files. Or do we call that Nonexistence Erasure? Either way it needs to be added.

Verses I know will be effected.

  • Digimon
  • Kingdom Hearts
  • Chrono Trigger
  • Shin Megami Tensei
  • Final Fantasy lll
  • Marvel
  • Under Night In-Birth
On the topic of Nonexistence Erasure, I think we need a page for this ability.
 
I can definitely try to make that page. Hell, I actually did some work on it to make it a page on the Superpower wiki.

I think they can both be listed as Nonexistence Erasure, but specifying what they can do with it (Like Sora can't just erase nothingness directly, he can only destroy Nobodies).
 
Dragonmasterxyz said:
We could possibly have 2 types.
Type 1: Can erase nonexistence directly.

Type 2: Can only erase nonexistent beings. (Most would qualify for this)
I like this idea.
 
Not sure if it's needed as a full blown power? I'd say this would fit better as general void manipulation. Either way you're affecting void, just not in the same way.
 
I mean we apparently already list Void Manipulation and Nonexistence Erasure/Manipulation as two different things.
 
Pretty sure that's just a justification. But really, it should just be a higher level fo Void Manip rather than its own power. Especially since most cases of this aren't explicit power and more like author screw up.
 
Btw, this is something I've been meaning to ask. What's to stop a character like Dialga (using him because he was the first character I could think of who restored existences before and not out of bias, if that's what you're thinking ovo) from making a nonexistent character into an existent one and then incapacitating or even killing them? They wouldn't necessarily resurrect as death and nonexistence aren't necessarily the same thing.
 
I mean, technically Nonexistent Physiology and Existence Erasure are Void Manipulation as well, but we treat it as another power. Not to mention erasing people from nonexistence is not listed on the Void Manipulation page. I mean, author screw ups aside, this has become a solid power over time. I see no issue in making this a separate power of its own. Especially seeing as we are already spreading it out.
 
@Cal That would require Dialga to actually take the nonexistent existence and specifically make it existent instead of just making a being that's the same as the nonexistent one.
 
"Erasing nonexistence"

This always kills me inside. When you're nonexistent, you're gone. As gone as gone gets. You're more gone than anyone ever could be if you are truly, utterly nonexistent. You can't erase that.
 
@Saik, Dialga's an example. Not saying he'd do that if he fought Lavos or Apocalymon.

Btw, I've actually seen this done before with that SCP who's a little girl.
 
Azathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:
It's also a power that needs pretty heavy clarification, considering how heavily the qualifications for "nonexistence" are between verses.
Could you explain more on this one?
 
Dragonmasterxyz said:
Could you explain more on this one?
The way most verses describe nonexistence is as some variation of "does not exist in a conventional sense", not "does not exist at all in any capacity". These are extremely different, and "nonexistence erasure" is almost exclusively used on things that fall under the former. This should be made clear.
 
Back
Top