Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From the looks of it...no.Have any other staff members than Jasonsith and I helped out in this thread?
Have any other staff members than Jasonsith and I helped out in this thread?
@Jasonsith @SamanPatou @OgurtsowFrom the looks of it...no.
New calcs have been posted that bump the Low 6-Bs of the verse to High 6-B and there's contention on how the actual calc for the 6-Bs could be interptred to be High 6-A. The profiles on the wiki also don't acknowledge the fact Ken and the rest of the characters get multiple times stronger in the span of a few arcs.Can somebody write a post with easy to understand explanations regarding what we currently need to evaluate here please?
Thank you.New calcs have been posted that bump the Low 6-Bs of the verse to High 6-B and there's contention on how the actual calc for the 6-Bs could be interptred to be High 6-A. The profiles on the wiki also don't acknowledge the fact Ken and the rest of the characters get multiple times stronger in the span of a few arcs.
Some people at DA has a calc on the nukes and Soryu Tenra?We should also look at the DeviantArt stuff, like looking at that Goten Sho calc on DA with both a low end and high end but we use Jasonsith's timeframes, not to mention the DA calcs for the nukes and Soryu Tenra
Some people at DA has a calc on the nukes and Soryu Tenra?
Maybe I overlooked post me the link thanks - even if I am relatively too busy to use my desktop to do a proper review.
Actually...
So the guy on DA who made a calc for Jagi's nukes as well as one for Soryu Tenra remade them and, well...
The new Jagi nuke calc he used basically uses the fact that those nukes vaporized the Earth's oceans (although he used a slightly lower value for vaporizing the oceans), and then used the area of one nuke's explosion compared to the area of the Earth to calculate the number of nukes needed to vaporize all the oceans (1030 nukes), and got a value of...over 700 teratons.
Yeah.
And he actually used a lower value calc than what we use for vaporizing the oceans, so the true value is actually around 825 teratons.
I would call bull, but it honestly makes sense considering how we already scale Kaioh to the nukes vaporizing the oceans already, so context wise the power of one nuke scaling to the vaporization of the oceans is valid. Power-wise consistency is an entirely different story.
As for the Soryu Tenra calc remake, the low-end of 6.83 teratons isn't too much higher from what he got in his earlier Soryu Tenra calc (5.24 teratons), but the high-end is an impressive High 6-B+ at 636.53 teratons, so just short of 6-A baseline (and considering how casually Kasumi did this, it could upscale to baseline 6-a [760 teratons] since the multiplier is only about 1.19x. And keep in mind this was BoS Kasumi so he'd probably scale to BoS Ken.
So yeah, if either the first calc or the high-end of the 2nd calc are accepted, BoS Ken would get a HUGE buff.
I dunno about the nuke stuff.Post in thread 'Raoh High 6-A Tier Revision' https://vsbattles.com/threads/raoh-high-6-a-tier-revision.134114/post-4750993
Got it. I will give a short comment despite my work status rn.
Well, any nukes will make some water vaporise and we do not know how many nukes are there in total to make how much chunks of water vaporise.
We do know that one nuke has a fireball blast radius and that Jagi tanked it (likely so does Toki). So the previous methods that I already calculated and evaluated should remain in use.
For the Soryu Tenra feat, that is a new cloud splitting feat. So I will go through it some time later.
To be honest, that yield from the "statement" should always affix a "possibly" next to it.I dunno about the nuke stuff.
I mean, we currently use that stuff for the Kaioh statement, so why not use it for the nukes as well. THe context of both feats is basically the same.
For now, the 54.6 teraton one.Bumping this
Also a bit off topic, but where does 6-B+ Kenshiro even come from? There are a bunch of calcs but which one was accepted.
For now, the 54.6 teraton one.
As I already said, in the previous FoTNS CRT, @CloverDragon03 said that he accepted the 54.6 teraton calc which is why we chose it.Fist of the North Star Assorted Feats
vsbattles.fandom.com
The "original" accepted yield is 429583760.6 ton TNT (Mountain) and a later upgrade with biggest assumption I can accept brings in 5.34031E+11 tons TNT (Large Island).
The 54.6 teraton TNT yield comes from a discarded calculation assumption that was crossed out with an explanation why to discard such - whose reason was somehow neglected and later accepted because this "brings up a bigger number" and some people believed the cloud distance and height go way beyond what I see the author intends to be from the drawings and the setting and what a real life cloud can form.
I separated the intelligences for Raoh and Kasumi, not sure about the others.So has there been any progress with the required work here?
Also, were the FotNS characters all properly revised to separate their general and combat intelligences earlier?
Jasonsith can handle intelligence better than me.Okay. Can you check through ALL of the FotNS characters, and correct them when necessary, please? Or would you be willing and able to properly handle it, Jasonsith?
Fist of The North Star
vsbattles.fandom.com
Were the FotNS characters all properly revised to separate their general and combat intelligences earlier?
Can you check through ALL of the FotNS characters, and correct them when necessary, please? Or would you be willing and able to properly handle it, Jasonsith?
Fist of The North Star
vsbattles.fandom.com
@JasonsithJasonsith can handle intelligence better than me.
The Intelligence part... I shall tackle that tomorrow.Okay. Can you check through ALL of the FotNS characters, and correct them when necessary, please? Or would you be willing and able to properly handle it, Jasonsith?
Fist of The North Star
vsbattles.fandom.com
ThanksThe Intelligence part... I shall tackle that tomorrow.
Good luck with the math, buddy.The AP revamp part... it will take a while because I will be lacking quality time for the coming weeks (I mean, really crunching on some math instead of talking bluffs).