• An important announcement about how to solve problems with your discussion thread notifications, and other important issues.

    Please click here for further information.
  • Important information regarding the linking of images from Fandom wikis.

    Please click here for further information.
  • Important information regarding upcoming advertisements in this forum.

    Please click here for further information.
Status
Not open for further replies.
802
124
Oh, christ. I leave for fifteen minutes and it all goes to shit.

Surely any of you can see why having a page called "Porno Diane" is a bad idea on the same wiki that has Barney the Dinosaur, Wordgirl, and Clifford the Big Red Dog. And yes, Agnaa. Won't someone think of the children? With how high VSBW is in SEO, a kid could easily stumble upon this. I can definitely see a little kid finding this, searching for Porygon or Porky the Pig, and having this show up instead. In fact, if you type "Por", it's the fourth result. That's a lawsuit waiting to happen. If COPPA was instated right now, Wikia likely would be given a very hefty fine, given that most of our popular pages are animated cartoons and comics aimed at, you guessed it, children.

Anyways, I found this after doing a little research. I know this won't stop any of you, hell, it will probably encourage some of you to keep the page up. But I want you all to realize that VSBW is becoming a laughingstock outside of this website for stunts like this. I'd like to note that to prevent any of you to taking anything I've posted here out of context again, I don't really give a damn about anything else on the DA rant besides the fact that other people outside this site have taken an interest in "Porno Diane."

At the end of the day, it's one page in a sea of hundreds of thousands. It's not appropriate, and frankly, I don't see why it should be kept outside of "Well, Bastard as a whole isn't literal hentai, so it's only a 3 and therefore fine." No, "It's been here since 2015" isn't an answer. Does that imply that if this was made in 2019, it would be taken down post haste? That's what it sounds like. The creation date of the page is irrelevant.

It's not because of boobs, or succubi, or demons, or whatever the hell you guys were trying to do there. It's the fact that sexually explicit imagery, combined with a page named "Porno Diane", is not a good combo. Have some self-awareness, guys.
 
8,919
3,111
We have decided that we allow relatively sexual verses. We've had threads about this, and we made a page for you to read about it Acceptable content rating scale. This site is intended for people of age thirteen years and older (and I'm pretty sure there's disclaimers about that, both by Fandom and by us), who won't have a heart attack if they see the word "Porno" in a name.

Hell, there's other fandom wikis with pictures of characters, including a monster that literally just looks like a giant green *****. Not a "close resemblance" or anything, but it's unmistakably a *****. Fandom is okay with this, and the stuff we include is not nearly that bad.

The only part about that three-year-old rant about "stunts like this" complains that we removed the Danny Sexbang profile for the name, but not Porno Diane. I don't know the situation back in 2016, but the Danny Sexbang profile was remade differently and deleted due to being based off a series of music videos with no continuity, so regardless, that criticism is moot.
 
2,845
811
Why would the main problem be the image and the name? That shouldn't be the reason for the profile to be deleted at all. That post was made three years ago, and while there a few recent comments, it doesn't matter. Also "It's not because of boobs" yet the argument is "sexually explicit imagery".
 
802
124
So is YouTube. They say it on their terms of service. They have a Kids app children are supposed to use instead.

Guess how many people between the ages of 5 to 11 can get on YouTube without a hitch, despite it violating the Terms of Service. Spoiler alert: It's a lot.

A disclaimer isn't going to stop kids from coming here, and you know that, Agnaa.

At the very, very least, change the picture.
 
802
124
DatOneWeeb said:
Why would the main problem be the image and the name? That shouldn't be the reason for the profile to be deleted at all. That post was made three years ago, and while there a few recent comments, it doesn't matter. Also "It's not because of boobs" yet the argument is "sexually explicit imagery".
Yeah, it's not because of boobs alone. It's a sex demon. There's onomatopoeias on the picture for jiggle physics. The entire character is overtly sexual. Bayonetta isn't (@WeeklyBattles), or she wouldn't be in Smash, a game rated E for Everyone. It's a false equivalence. There is a fine line between a busty character and this.
 
8,919
3,111
So "Kids can access it, therefore we can't have a page for a well-endowed character with 'Porno' in the name." We can't stop kids from seeing any of the gory content on this site either, all we can do is warn them.

The rules we've discussed at length and come to a consensus on disagree with you.

How many more exercises in sophistry are you going to engage in? Arguing for nerf gun profiles and pool floatie profiles, and now arguing against legitimate characters because they're called "Porno", are a succubus, and have a 'boing' sound effect next to their tits.
 
802
124
Considering that the administrators run this site and have the capacity to control what is seen on this wiki, yeah, it is. And it doesn't fall within the guidelines, as said in the Editing Rules. "the pages have to be kept clean, without erotic images." Look at that page again and tell me you wouldn't mind your grandmother knowing you looked at that.
 
8,919
3,111
DatOneWeeb said:
Might as well remove Lucoa for constantly having absurd jiggle physics and constantly trying to seduce Shouta.
There's a thousand profiles like it. We're not going to remove every succubus with big tits, even if they have an old-fashioned barely risque word like "porno" in their name.

@Nemo I wouldn't care. That image is not erotic to the point of being disallowed on the site.
 
4,597
1,087
Most of us who use this site seriously are adults, we can look at an image and not instantly have our souls corrupted or whatever. Kids can find way worse stuff than what we allow here with a quick google search. Also I really wouldn't my grandma lives several states away.
 
802
124
Agnaa, if you're saying that image isn't erotic, I don't know what is going through your head. Please enlighten me as to how its main purpose is not to arouse people.
 
8,919
3,111
It looks like the character desig is meant to arouse people, but that it's just a random picture of the character. We can't just ban every character whose character design is meant to be attractive.
 
802
124
CinnabarManx421 said:
Most of us who use this site seriously are adults, we can look at an image and not instantly have our souls corrupted or whatever. Kids can find way worse stuff than what we allow here with a quick google search. Also I really wouldn't my grandma lives several states away.
You're latching onto something ultimately insignificant I've said, twisting it into a question of "How far away is my grandmother?" rather than "Would I be ashamed if she was here right now?", and ignoring the rest of my points.

Also, I can name several users that are quite obviously children. In the literal sense, not the "I don't like them so I'm going to call them a kid" sense. They're quite active.
 
4,597
1,087
Bro we don't care if it's erotic. We are not responsible for children having no online restrictions. As long as it's not straight up p0rn, we're cool with it, Fandom's cool with it. If the mods wanted to change it they could've done so any time they wanted. Know why they didn't? Because they are fine with it too. Most people seem to be against the change anyway so it's likely not going to happen.
 
802
124
Agnaa said:
It looks like the character desig is meant to arouse people, but that it's just a random picture of the character. We can't just ban every character whose character design is meant to be attractive.
Then find a different picture if it's so "random." Or is that impossible? Since it clearly hasn't been done since 2015, has it.

I wouldn't make the picture for Asuka Langley Sohryu the part where Shinji beats off in front of her naked body in the End of Evangelion. There has to be a better choice that's less sexual.
 
8,919
3,111
I don't think other pictures would be better enough for it to matter.

If all you want to change is the picture, find one yourself and take it to a CRT, don't clutter up the profile deletions thread with this shit.
 

Sir_Ovens

Resident Kitchen Appliance
VS Battles
Sysop
11,137
3,056
I've said this once, and I'll quote myself again.

"I think we really need to stress that the difference between 3 and 4 is that 4 is just straight up porn. There's no deeper content other than getting from A to B, with B being doing it outright. Devilman is nowhere close to being 4. It has themes and elements that stray away from just doing the dirty.

Like, let me make this crystal clear: Two characters having sex does not automatically mean level 4, even if you can see every disgusting detail.

3 is a story with mature themes that maybe has sex here and there that isn't the point of the material. 4 is made with the intent of making you fail NNN."

Porno comes from a level 2-3 verse. If she was a level 4 all by herself, she would make the entire verse level 4. But she isn't. She stays.

Edit: Ignore the context for Devilman, I was talking about something else at the time. But my point still stands.
 

The_Calaca

VS Battles
Retired
14,573
5,756
If we were to delete every verse with an explicit sex scene, titles like Berserk or Tokyo Ghoul would have to meet the same fate.

Do I need to tell someone that Berserk isn't made just for sex? If a franchise uses these scenes I don't think it should be disqualified, even if the lewdness is too high. We simply pick the best pictures to use and call it a day.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
99,900
20,945
I agree with the others. A crude name and a woman in a bikini is not enough for us to ban a profile, as long as it does not originate in a level 4 setting and there is no actual nudity. That's it. End of discussion. Now please stop derailing this thread.

Also, given that Nemo has created inappropriate profiles in the past just to make a point, he needs to stop with the possible light trolling.
 
For now yeah, maybe, however Dante appears in more media aside from the profiles that we have here, so I think it needs a discussion in a separate thread
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
99,900
20,945
We should almost exclusively use composite profiles for characters with unclear continuity and no coherent canon. It would set a bad precedent, with lots of demands for composite profiles for other popular characters. I would much rather avoid that problem.
 

Moritzva

VS Battles
Joke Battles
FC/OC Battles
Thread Moderator
Content Moderator
8,109
1,172
I agree that Dante should not be a composite, for Ant's reasoning.
 
Yeah gotta agree, Further Dante has a few guest appearances and crossovers but he doesn't have nearly enough alternate appearances to denote the need for a composite profile. He's not like godzilla where there are fifty versions of the character. Thus making a composite just seems pointless. At least in my opinion.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
99,900
20,945
Thanks. It is probably best if we simply decide to not allow a composite profile and drop this discussion, in order to avoid derailing this thread too much.
 
2,244
449
I disagree.

Devilman has a clear cut canon (The original Devilman manga) and as even less versions on the wiki than Dante (He has two profiles) yet he has a composite profile.
 
Frank (Donnie Darko)

Frank Anderso was already on this wiki. Perhaps to avoid future confusion the "Frank Anderson" profile should likely be renamed to "Frank (Donnie Dark)"

Aside from that the new profile is inaccurate
 
3,785
201
Deleting the profile i just Made without reason/disscuss it with me kinda make me feel something raging inside me
 
8,919
3,111
@Ant Could you give me the source code to the now-deleted SCP-001-J_(Daveyoufool's_Proposal) page?
 

Elizhaa

VS Battles
Sysop
12,179
2,592
Here is the page's source code:


[[File:Keep_Calm_and_Apolly_On.jpg|thumb|400px]]{{Quote|Good goin', OO1-J, you destroyed our civilization. This is your reward, an eternity of Toby Keith. Was it worth it?|}}

==Summary==
SCP-OO1-J is a lethal cognitohazard, and as such, is available on request for all interested personnel.

==Powers and Stats==
[[Tiering System|Tier]]: At least '''6-A'''

'''Name: '''SCP-001-J "Keep Calm and Apolly on"

'''Origin:''' [[SCP Foundation]]

'''Gender: '''Unknown,''' '''likely Genderless

'''Age: '''Unknown

'''Classification: '''Apollyon class lethal cognitohazard

'''Powers and Abilities:''' [[Death Manipulation]] (A species has gone extinct as a result of SCP-OO1-J), [[Destruction]] (Destroyed a city, country and continent from an unknown cause)

'''[[Attack Potency]]: Continent level '''(Destroyed a Continent)

'''[[Speed]]:''' '''Unknown''', likely '''Omnipresent '''(SCP-001-J seems to have always been near The Earth, but hasn't been active due to the existence of miracles)

'''[[Lifting Strength]]: Unknown'''

'''[[Striking Strength]]: '''At least '''Continent Class '''(Destroyed a continent)

'''[[Durability]]: Unknown '''(Hasn't been seen taking any form of damage)

'''[[Stamina]]: Unknown''', likely High

'''[[Range]]: Unknown''', likely '''Tens of kilometers '''with powers

'''[[Standard Equipment]]: '''None notable

'''[[Intelligence]]:''' '''Unknown '''(Hasn't shown any sign of intelligence)

'''Weaknesses:''' Seems to calm down from quiet noises, which could be the reason why it began to bust a city, country and continent when loud noises are present.

==Others==
'''Notable Victories:'''

'''Notable Losses:'''

'''Inconclusive Matches:'''
[[Category:SCP Foundation]]
[[Category:Characters]]
[[Category:Destruction Users]]
[[Category:Death Users]]
[[Category:Giants]]
[[Category:Omnipresent Beings]]
[[Category:Evil Characters]]
[[Category:Tier 6]]
 
8,919
3,111
@Elizhaa Thank you

@Stalker Maggot I'm pretty sure it is, there was some discussion about it when SCP-001-J was made. Basically, the thing is, there's a canon tale that connects to a lot of canon material on the SCP wiki which establishes many "joke profiles" (those with a -J suffix) as being real things, that are simply the work of delusional reality warpers.

From this, we've allowed pages for joke profiles that weren't explicitly legitimized by that tale. If this explanation isn't satisfactory, feel free to create a thread about it.
 
8,919
3,111
@GojiBoyForever For the 001-J? I intend to look into it sometime soon. I don't have any plans for 682-J.
 
8,919
3,111
I looked into SCP-001-J_(Daveyoufool%27s_Proposal) and in short, its statistics are unfounded, it should stay deleted and not be recreated.

In long, the only substantial thing in the actual article is that it's a "lethal cognitohazard", the other feats on it aren't actually feats, but planned warning systems for if it were ever to reach that level of destruction. And even then, its nature as a cognitohazard means it's merely an un-moving symbol that kills you when it looks at it, any continent-level destruction would be from all those people witnessing it and dying.
 

LordGriffin1000

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
8,235
1,438
Who deleted the page for Funhouse (Danny Phantom) I created?.

Edit: I found out who deleted it but the reason doesn't make any sense. Funhouse doesn't have an official appearance because he's a non-canon character. If it's about his actual physical appearance, Butch Hartman drew him as Danny's reflection because that is his power!. He embodies the reflections of others and brings them to life, your not suppose to see what he actually looks like!.
 

The_Impress

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
5,953
1,562
Ya girl just removed all the links from CH except SCP-079 and Standard Equipment, which she didn't have access to.

Remove those as well and then the profile can be deleted
 

Moritzva

VS Battles
Joke Battles
FC/OC Battles
Thread Moderator
Content Moderator
8,109
1,172
Rest in peace, my sweet prince.
 

Jasonsith

VS Battles
Calculation Group
5,758
725
Jobs profile are allowed?

What about real life jobs being listed as a calc blog, just like the fresh current treatment for composite human? (Remember: Real life jobs are only put here as reference blogs and not character profiles as stated by many mods, admins and bcrats.)

I am sure some have been fascinated to create some job profiles (e.g. for real world soldiers, police forces and terrorist groups) already.

But the current system says we can only create profiles for real world weapons, vehicles and "organisms".

I ask this so that fewer profiles will be deemed invalid for exiatence.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
99,900
20,945
I do not think that real life jobs profiles would be appropriate for this wiki. Sorry.
 
1,398
60
[[1]] this is just... not a good profile. Not only is it missing incredible amounts of information,and is incredible downplay- but there isn't a single justification for one thing
 

Jasonsith

VS Battles
Calculation Group
5,758
725
Tago238 said:
[[1]] this is just... not a good profile. Not only is it missing incredible amounts of information,and is incredible downplay- but there isn't a single justification for one thing
I will fix it during the weekend. I may know a bit of the justification.
 
1,398
60
There is also a lot of stuff missing. Hell, I just started watching the series and I know that Archer should have social influencing, stealth mastery, hacking, vehicular mastery ,sleep manipulation/ paralysis inducement with knockout gas and explosion manipulation (it literally says he has grenades as standard equipment in the profile), acrobatics that sometimes borders on surface scaling. And you can probably find dozens of feats putting him at subsonic
 
1,398
60
(well I look like a fool for suggesting he was subsonic) that's great, but he still should have a lot more powers. But you know who we should have a profile of more than Malory archer? Krieger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top