• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd like to let everyone know that this line of logic, if accepted, should be used to delet Xeno, Toei, and Manga Goku, otherwise it is a blatant double standard.
 
Maybe Xeno Goku sure but Toei Goku should have a different back story and such from normal Manga Goku thanks to some of the movies which definitely helps him fall under the notable and very prominent part of the rule

Beefed up Ryuko is not notable and prominent. Sure she can be argued to be prominent because she is a main character just like in the show. But what about her is notable, besides her strength, that makes her any different from normal Ryuko?

This is like if someone went wnd made profiles for.the fighterz characters. They aren't unique or notable enough to warrent pages which is why only 21 has a psge.
 
Not only that but Toei Goku is from the GT canon which differentiates itself from the main canon to essentially be its own thing as opposed to just one time deals like the movies where one thing happens and it's all back to normal.
 
I personally do not mind if an alternative version of Ryuko is allowed, as long as it is reasonably notable.
 
It's about as notable as Shin Budokai Dragon Ball characters with the whole what if scenarios they had. Which is to say not that much.
 
The game came out less than a week ago and is already selling quite well, and it has been hyped for months, its not really fair or accurate to say its not notable
 
A game selling well doesn't equate to a Ryuko in a video game being completely different from the canon version in almost every aspect.
 
Except it does...? Because its stated both by the creators of the game and by the game itself that she is...?
 
Gotta love how no one who wants the profile deleted even attempts to explain how it's different than Xeno Goku.

Also again this is simply just an alternate timeline but it's still equally as valid as the main continuity. Plus unlike with DC or DB, this is literally the only video game/spin-off of the series there is. That automatically brings it to a higher level of notability and prominence within that franchise.
 
Weekly didn't say that selling well made Ryuko different tho, you guys were talking about being notable (with the comment about her being as notable as Shin Budokai Dragon Ball, and such), not about being different, and the game's popularity (which includes how well it is selling) is directly linked with its notability, since notability is about fame and importance.
 
If Ryukama considers the profile acceptable, I think that it can stay.
 
Elizhaa handled it.
 
I have deleted it.
 
The Divine Phoenix said:
Mecha Naruto

Is this allowed? I'm not sure. The profile is low quality anyways.
Profiles for anime only characters are allowed provided the profiles are well written and stats are properly justified. We do have many profiles for characters that have appeared in anime only and are non-canon to manga. But if the profile is poorly made, then it should be re-written or deleted.
 
Well, regardless, the page has been deleted multiple times. Someone should probably inform the page creator, if that hasn't been done already.
 
Remind him to, if he seeks to create the page again, to do a blog first so he can get feedback in case he commits any mistake before releasing a low quality page.
 
Seems a little suspicious for a completely new user to post a fully-formatted rule-breaking profile for their first edit...
 
Possibly, but we have been insufficiently strict with YouTube profiles recently. Maybe that inspired him?
 
The debate for hentai characters isn't finished yet, but it's close. It should probably be brought up in this thread but still deleted
 
I deleted it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top