- 1,115
- 235
Maybe she used hax help for destroy every darkhold
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Possibly Controversial High 3-A Upgrade for MCU Scarlet Witch
- Thread starter Yoazkk6188
- Start date
- Status
- 304
- 155
omg im too slow for this
okay so like yeah wouldnt that just be high 3-A for her fire manipulation hax rather than her own magic bc theyre saying that her magic would be high 3-A for destroying the darkhold
- 577
- 163
I mean it already is listed on her profile that she can’t scale to High 3-A with that hax..omg im too slow for this
okay so like yeah wouldnt that just be high 3-A for her fire manipulation hax rather than her own magic bc theyre saying that her magic would be high 3-A for destroying the darkhold
”Wanda cannot be scaled to High 3-A, since she used a hax rather than her own raw magic power to destroy every Darkhold in the Multiverse.”
This CRT makes no sense to me. It was already agreed upon that her Magic was unscalable to her erasure of the Darkholds.
- 304
- 155
uhh i think that was from when she had existence erasure back then and she couldnt scale to that for erasing it which was why that was listed there
but like her EE got removed and her destroying the darkhold got changed to her using fire manipulation for that so OP considered her having high 3-A via fire manipulation
at first when i applied my previous crt to her profile i didnt do anything to that note bc i assumed that it was still hax regardless so her using fire manipulation to destroy the darkhold wouldnt make much of a difference but like ppl here seem to be fine with it so ig apparently she could scale to that via fire manipulation??
- 577
- 163
Well yeah I agree with you..I don’t get how this isn’t still a hax by all means. The OP isn’t even clear
- 16,015
- 12,500
I really don't know how to apply a feat like this honestly. Whatever the other staff and knowledgeable members decide on, I'm not going to argue. It's a weird feat to scale in my opinion.
- 1,115
- 235
For her to burn every darkhold, she would still need infinite energy, although she would still need a darkhold to successfully destroy the darkhold, so there are 3 options for her: 1: with fire manipulation
2: with magic
3: with darkhold
- 353
- 113
"with darkhold" seems good
- 577
- 163
Yeah I agree with that
- 1,115
- 235
Yeah with darkhold seems good to me but whoever used it should scale it or no idk about that whatever
- 577
- 163
Agatha at High 3-A is kinda crazy
- 1,115
- 235
Yeah that so crazyAgatha at High 3-A is kinda crazy
- 304
- 155
well that would only work if she’s directly using a darkhold spell or the book itself to destroy the darkholds, but the darkhold seems to be an amp and her being able to reach other universes is due to that since she wasnt able to do any powerful spells without it so we could just do something like
at least 6-A with magic, up to High 3-A at peak (As she possesses the Darkhold, her chaos magic is greatly augmented, allowing her to cast spells across the Multiverse. Destroyed the Darkhold in every Universe all at once, burning each of them to ashes)
isnt that also what the OP had in the thread before they edited it to give her high 3-A via fire hax?
- 577
- 163
We could have something like High 3-A with The Darkhold (The Darkhold significantly amplifies its wielder, enabling the release of energy sufficient to destroy infinite copies of itself across the multiverse)
- 304
- 155
also scaling ppl who used the darkhold to High 3-A would be a problem bc strange beat his variant who used the darkhold
- 1,115
- 235
If given the option to not scale against her, I'd choose at peak and write in AP that her powers are best displayed based on her mood. She destroys the entire darkhold to atone for her crimes. Burning it all at once at the end
- 304
- 155
the other staff members agreed to her having High 3-A via fire manipulation, so if we’re going with an “up to ___ at peak” rating, then i think we should have their input on that also
- 1,115
- 235
yeah unnecessary scaling for other characters. The choice at peak doesn't look too bad. So we will have to wait for their opinion
- 11
- 1
i am disagree wanda h 3a
Wanda cannot used her power to destroy every Darkhold in the Multiverse
She destroying Mt Wundagore in one universe destroy all the Darkholds in every universe
- 1,115
- 235
That's just a message from your old CRT, and this has nothing to do with this CRT and her burn every darkhold. Many sources have already stated that Wundagore doesn't have just one universe, as seen in Deadpool 3. Yours doesn't change anything here
- 1,115
- 235
You will need to find proof that there is only 1 Wundagore in the infinite multivese. Your scan doesn't even indicate that there is only 1 Wundagore, and I have the scan for you to prove that Wundagore is not the only one as you say
1: Deadpool 3
2: Commentary with director Sam Raimi, writer Michael Waldron and producer Richie Palmer
So you need to find a scan that clearly states that there was only one Wundagore and that she destroyed Wundagore and the darkhold along with it.
Last edited:
- 96
- 20
- Thread starter
- #62
I've edited the content and provided some statements and evidence in support of her having the key at peak H3-A
- 1,115
- 235
What kind of H3-A would you give her? at peak or fire manipulation I think the problem with this CRT is just this
- 11
- 1
Wanda cannot used her power to destroy every Darkhold in the Multiverse
She destroying Mt Wundagore in one universe destroy all the Darkholds in every universe
Evidence from Ofc timeline marvel , So Wanda shouldn't
Can be scaled to High 3-A.
- 1,115
- 235
Your scans only mention that she destroys Wundagore and lets it fall on her, ending both threats of the multiverse. There is no mention of a single Wundagore or darkhold Every universe is connected to Wundagore in Universe 616 All you have to do now is find a new scan that Wundagore has a single place and it is connected to every darkhold in another universe
- 96
- 28
That’s not true. Castle Darkhold doesn’t exist in just one universe—it exists in every universe. We can see this in Deadpool 3, which shows Castle Darkhold existing in other universes. It’s true that on Earth-616, Castle Darkhold is the sole origin of the Darkhold, but that doesn’t mean other universes don’t have their own Castle Darkhold. And Wanda used her powers with the Darkhold to send out energy and destroy every Darkhold across all Multiverse.
- 96
- 28
You’re just typing the same thing over and over without providing any actual facts. The sources you cited don’t even explain why destroying Castle Darkhold would lead to the destruction of every Darkhold across the multiverse. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness clearly showed how Wanda sent her power to destroy the Darkholds, and it’s pretty obvious what form that took.
- 1,665
- 3,028
As a note, here's how the recent book Marvel Studios 100 Objects: Iconic Artifacts from the MCU describes it:
The Darkhold is also described in the book as a repository of Chaos Magic that enables practitioners to access energy from other dimensions:
The Darkhold is also described in the book as a repository of Chaos Magic that enables practitioners to access energy from other dimensions:
Last edited:
Excellence616
He/Him- 6,179
- 4,445
What's the argument?
- 1,115
- 235
At this point, we still can't come to a conclusion whether her H3-A key must be used with fire manipulation or at peak. If it's at peak, there won't be any scaling problems with other characters and fire manipulation as well. But the owner CRT supports being at peak with their information
Excellence616
He/Him- 6,179
- 4,445
At peak would be better to prevent any scaling issues
- 1,115
- 235
If so, are we still waiting for another staff member? Since it was approved by 2 people and another person did not object
- 96
- 28
Anyway, Marvel Specifically Used The Term "Destroy" Not "Erase." So, Based on Both The Interviews And What Was Shown In The Movie, This Should Count As Her AP, Not Just A Hax.
- 1,115
- 235
Yeah we talk about AP at all
- 1,115
- 235
That's right she doesn't get with power key, but rather at peak or fire manipulation to prevent scaling from other characters and she uses all her power to destroy every darkhold, so that's why it should be at peak
- 577
- 163
She still remains inconsistent whether we use “With Fire Manip” or “At peak”. Making her AP at peak High 3-A would still have an impact on Strange, I doubt her peak came in the last 20 minutes of the movie.
- 1,115
- 235
We rarely see her use her powers to their full potential, other than destroying every darkhold. Most of her attacks start with round hex bolts, so in battles she doesn't use her full powers in fighting
- 577
- 163
She was bloodlusted so..I doubt that.
- 1,115
- 235
If she gets angry and uses her full power her eyes will turn red as seen in endgame. She defeats Thanos with her anger and ultimate power at that point
- Status
Similar threads
