- 15,490
- 10,296
It seems that the new CRSC calc is stronger than Orochi feat, so, the low 5-b justificative to saitama need to be the Boros one
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
OPM Low 5-B upgrades
- Thread starter Qawsedf234
- Start date
- Status
- 15,277
- 15,438
Saitama’s justification can have the Gaia Cannon and the CSRC in it, it doesn’t need to be one or the other.
- 3,955
- 2,747
Has the low 5-B CSRC calc been accepted? If so that should be discussed here now. It would be better to rate Boros by his own calc than by narrative scaling from Orochi.
- 2,359
- 1,972
This
- 15,277
- 15,438
Qawsdef and a lot of people agreed with it being “High 6-A, possibly Low 5-B.” It doesn’t come from scaling to Orochi.
- 3,955
- 2,747
I wasn't trying to exclude CSRC, I was just looking at the low 5-B upgrades from an Orochi-centric perspective. If Low 5-B CSRC has been accepted we should use it as well, 100%.
- 15,490
- 10,296
How is orochi envolved with Boros?
- 3,955
- 2,747
Ah, so we're just doing a possibly with the calc? I'd prefer just to have one accepted end as opposed to a minimum and maximum end if possible. If the low 5-B end is accepted I suggest replacing my calc with that one and making CSRC solidly low 5-B.
- 15,277
- 15,438
It’s a possibly because the scorching (High 6-A) and blasting away (Low 5-B) translations are equally valid. Neither one is more accurate than the other, which is why we aren’t doing one solid end.
- 383
- 355
I just realized how nobody agreed upon which Relativistic end for the Mass Ejection feat.
- 19,552
- 15,860
- Thread starter
- #453
Saitama would be "At least Low 5-B (very casually deflected the Gaia cannon, has never seriously exerted himself), potentially 5-B (While holding back overpowered the CSRC)"
The mass ejection end is something like 1.5x to 1.8x below baseline 5-B
- 3,566
- 877
Considering Oroshi absorbed energy and turned it into a blast attack why did we use KE Calc for that? Like is it applicable?
- 15,490
- 10,296
...5-B saitama?
- 3,955
- 2,747
Dang, all the more important that we come to a conclusion on which CSRC end to use. It would be nice if the low 5-B+ end were accepted over the others and Saitama could just be 5-B.
- 2,359
- 1,972
What about likely far higher part?
- 19,552
- 15,860
- Thread starter
- #458
They're scaling the KE to him physically pulling the core to himself, not the energy absorption.
- 19,552
- 15,860
- Thread starter
- #459
If the 5-B thing is included there's no reason for it.
- 15,565
- 11,858
Personally I think 10-15 seconds is what should be used for KE, maybe 20.
- 2,359
- 1,972
Overpowered while holding back
- 3,955
- 2,747
Looking at the CSRC mass scatter calc, the mass scatter end seems to not have been reevaluated despite all the changes. I will post this in the calc evaluations thread and get this looked at with the new scaling in mind.
- 19,552
- 15,860
- Thread starter
- #463
That's how he would be pushed to 5-B. The beam itself is just on the higher end of Low 5-B, him holding back is what would push it to a 5-B rating
- 15,277
- 15,438
I’m not sure which end would be more accurate for the mass ejection thing tbh. We could go with 5 seconds just to be safe, but 1 second also makes sense so idk.
- 15,490
- 10,296
1 second
- 3,955
- 2,747
Hey Armorchompy, could you evaluate the mass-scatter end for CRSC now that it's the most consistent end from a scaling perspective? If you want to know more about the legitimacy of the mass-scatter end, Qawsed can translate that for you.
- 15,565
- 11,858
Blast away doesn't necessarily imply shooting it into space IMO. Shooting it, say, 1 km in the air would definitely fit the definition of "blast away/scatter". I don't think that end is safe to use.
- 19,552
- 15,860
- Thread starter
- #468
Was always worth a shot.
If everyone agrees with Ouro's stuff I'll just put in all the changes now
- 2,359
- 1,972
Is everything decided then? Before making final changes I would like to ask a question if it doesn't bother anyone. I know this probably will not be accepted but why can't we use this calc and make Saitama's tiering "low 5-B, possibly 3A"
Bringing this up totally isn't related to me being Saitama stan
- 15,565
- 11,858
I'm fine with those changed being applied yeah
- 15,565
- 11,858
(also saitama growing in power was rejected due to contradictions)
- 15,490
- 10,296
- 3,955
- 2,747
The Saitama growing in power statement is debatable in general and not useable for direct scaling purposes.
If there's nothing further I say that we apply the changes
If there's nothing further I say that we apply the changes
- 15,565
- 11,858
Anyway since you asked for an explanation, even if Saitama constantly growing in power was accepted, we can't assume the amount by which Saitama's strength increased every day, and whether it was multiplicative or additive.
- 2,359
- 1,972
It was worth a try. Anyway, I agree with everything
- 19,552
- 15,860
- Thread starter
- #476
- 3,955
- 2,747
I've notified the main OPM thread that this CRT will be closing soon. If people don't come comment in the next couple minutes we can apply these changes and close the thread.
- 17,946
- 15,575
- 15,565
- 11,858
While we're here since this isn't worth a CRT, why do we consider Saitama's stamina Unknown? His training regimen was really brutal and he did it even after being beat up by monsters and all (back when he wasn't invincible obviously), that's definitely worth a stamina rating IMO.
- 15,490
- 10,296
Very High then? or Extremely High? He repeated the same process for 3 years and stated that it almost killed him
- Status
Similar threads
