-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One Punch Man Disaster Ratings Part 2
- Thread starter ByAsura
- Start date
-
- Tags
- one-punch man
- Status
- 6,590
- 3,423
I found the webcomic one
- 6,590
- 3,423
Oh well, that helps I guess
Still, afaik a Dragon doesn't auto scales higher than a Demon in speed anymore, so we should change FU's speed description to his feats against the S Class, while Amai Mask scales to him + being above the other A heroes
Still, afaik a Dragon doesn't auto scales higher than a Demon in speed anymore, so we should change FU's speed description to his feats against the S Class, while Amai Mask scales to him + being above the other A heroes
- 25,025
- 27,039
If we don't autoscale via speed anymore does that mean AP gets the same treatment?
- 6,590
- 3,423
I dunno ? I said that because I saw Hypersonic Melzalgald, so I assumed speed went for direct scaling and not by rankings, but AP should still scale if u ask me, while the series showed numerous times that speed varies, AP is consistent between the threat levels
- 22,391
- 18,598
- Thread starter
- #87
As I said (and was agreed to) in the other thread, AP's fine unless there's circumstances to suggest that isn't the case (like having Death Manipulation or something).
- 167,872
- 76,498
- 25,025
- 27,039
I mean We already Boros is superior to the Hypersonic scaling. To say "possibly Hypersonic" is pretty misleading.
I'd say we might as just stick to "At least Hypersonic, possibly far higher"
- 167,872
- 76,498
- 15,452
- 15,867
That’s what I originally suggested smh
- 8,846
- 9,509
Can I get a TLDR for this?
- 15,452
- 15,867
Armored Boros scales above his subordinates, who are getting downgraded to Hypersonic since Dragon levels aren’t necessarily faster than Demon levels.
- 8,846
- 9,509
Hmm. Hmm. Interesting. I disagree with hypersonic. I think it should be lower.
- 25,025
- 27,039
- 8,846
- 9,509
There are several reasons why Melzy (and by extension, Boros) should not be hypersonic at all.
The OP points out that we're no longer gonna scale speed from threat levels. Good. Because of that, theres no reason why Sky King should be hypersonic. He's hypersonic because I'm assuming it's from him being comparable to Sea King. The same Sea King who was equal to PPP then later blitzed him and got even faster than that. PPP later on blitzed Melzy many times before he could react.
The logic we currently present on the pages are Melzy > Sky King = Sea King >= PPP > Melzy??? It makes no sense. I've read the alien arc dozens of times for the past couple of months and every S Class member that comes across Melzy blitzes the poor dude.
He shouldn't scale to Bang either because he was holding back and even perception blitzed him earlier.
As a side note it's stated that Iaian was toying with his enemy and was noticeably blitzing Melzy while fighting him. Only having his arm taken off due to getting caught off guard and likely toying around.
Since hypersonic wouldn’t be an option, I suggest supersonic+. I made a calc off site of a feat Melzargard performed and I can remake it in a blog here. This affects Released Boros because he has no speed feats.
The OP points out that we're no longer gonna scale speed from threat levels. Good. Because of that, theres no reason why Sky King should be hypersonic. He's hypersonic because I'm assuming it's from him being comparable to Sea King. The same Sea King who was equal to PPP then later blitzed him and got even faster than that. PPP later on blitzed Melzy many times before he could react.
The logic we currently present on the pages are Melzy > Sky King = Sea King >= PPP > Melzy??? It makes no sense. I've read the alien arc dozens of times for the past couple of months and every S Class member that comes across Melzy blitzes the poor dude.
He shouldn't scale to Bang either because he was holding back and even perception blitzed him earlier.
As a side note it's stated that Iaian was toying with his enemy and was noticeably blitzing Melzy while fighting him. Only having his arm taken off due to getting caught off guard and likely toying around.
Since hypersonic wouldn’t be an option, I suggest supersonic+. I made a calc off site of a feat Melzargard performed and I can remake it in a blog here. This affects Released Boros because he has no speed feats.
- 31,404
- 27,705
Sky King's profile has so few justifications that it should be deleted to be honest.
- 19,387
- 17,001
PPP was able to react to Bang perception blitzing Melz. PPP only scales to the SK's in his ealier key. In this key, he would scale to Bang in this key.
Alien Arc Key: Bang ~ PPP >= Iaian > Melz
Earlier Arcs: Melz > Sky King = Sea King >= PPP
- 25,025
- 27,039
I'm pretty sure PPP was supposed to get a new key in another CRT but no got to it for some reason. Can't remember which
- 22,391
- 18,598
- Thread starter
- #106
PPP should not scale to Bang just because he reacted to him, even if that was Bang's full speed (we know it wasn't because of what he says after Mel punches him).
Would you be able to import that calc to here?
Last edited:
- 19,387
- 17,001
The point of me saying that isn't really to put him at Bang's level, it was to put PPP above Melz to counter what Zamasu said.
- 22,391
- 18,598
- Thread starter
- #108
So by 'Bang ~ PPP', you just meant in that instance? Ok.
I'll just do that and replace all his former scaling with the quote that places them as equals.
- 8,846
- 9,509
Yes.
- 167,872
- 76,498
This is just a note that I performed the following changes to the Saitama page earlier today. Is this acceptable?
vsbattles.fandom.com
Saitama
Saitama (サイタマ?) is a human from Z-City who; through rigorous (sort of) training broke through his human limiters and achieved unbelievable strength and abilities. Never breaking a sweat, the name One Punch Man is fitting for the effortless wins Saitama has achieved through the series. Never...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 25,025
- 27,039
I think it's fine
- 8,846
- 9,509
Melzargard surprises Iaian
vsbattles.fandom.com
Last edited:
- 15,452
- 15,867
Saitama gets his 5-B by upscaling from a Low 5-B+ character, so he probably shouldn’t have an At least there.This is just a note that I performed the following changes to the Saitama page earlier today. Is this acceptable?
Saitama
Saitama (サイタマ?) is a human from Z-City who; through rigorous (sort of) training broke through his human limiters and achieved unbelievable strength and abilities. Never breaking a sweat, the name One Punch Man is fitting for the effortless wins Saitama has achieved through the series. Never...
- 167,872
- 76,498
Well, I think that adding "At least" is our standard approach when writing "likely far higher" at the end of a statistic.
- 15,452
- 15,867
As far as I can tell, the descriptions of ‘At least’ and ‘higher’ on the Attack Potency page doesn’t say anything about doing that.
- 15,452
- 15,867
The “At least” doesn’t make sense for Saitama though. 5-B comes directly from him upscaling a Low 5-B+. How can he be ‘At least 5-B’ when he’s the only 5-B and baseline?
- 15,452
- 15,867
Like, before the recent upgrades, Saitama was “5-C, likely far higher”.
There was no reason for him to have an “At least” since the 5-C value came directly from him, and there’s nothing that says a “likely far higher” rating needs to be accompanied by an “At least”.
There was no reason for him to have an “At least” since the 5-C value came directly from him, and there’s nothing that says a “likely far higher” rating needs to be accompanied by an “At least”.
- Status
