- 4,458
- 4,524
That's not even a statement for Queen though. Nor is it a clear lightspeed statement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How is Luffy calling a Laser too slow not good enough?That's not even a statement for Queen though. Nor is it a clear lightspeed statement.
It ain't derailing. Its to prove Queen has LS reactions. Also didn't Ray state that good kenbu users can react to light?Let's not derail with bringing up Sabaody Luffy's feat.
Its been accepted before. But the validity isn't that important, it does make for good supporting evidence imo.Luffy calling a laser slow and precogging it with obs haki from a far away distance isn’t exactly the same as fighting someone in close quarters. Not that I disagree with the calc, I just disagree with that moron.
Because he’s stuck in the air… he moves slower in the air (that is even shown with Sanji and niji) Sanji can’t flyAnd it does seem extremely weird for an FTL+ Sanji (who you'd expect would have reactions that fast too, right?) to be hit by a lightspeed attack that he can plainly see coming at him. Sanji can move over twelve times faster than Queen, but couldn't move a couple meters out of the way while Queen's head was travelling 6+ meters towards him?
Because he’s stuck in the air… he moves slower in the air (that is even shown with Sanji and niji) Sanji can’t fly
So this may be a case similar to calc-stacking then?I will say since I'm the one who started all of this, I figured the reason why the calc might not be useable was because we try to be strict about giving out stuff like lightspeed reactions to help keep speed from getting out of control. So we normally only award them when statements are given, and having lightspeed attack isn't enough to then assume a character has lightspeed reactions in regards to calcing. If I'm wrong on that front, apologies for starting all of this, I just thought the standards were different.
Would it really be Calc stacking though if the whole light speed stuff is accepted here? At least that's what I'm getting from this conversation, that the light speed Henry Blazer stuff or whatever was accepted.So this may be a case similar to calc-stacking then?
Sanji reacted and dodged a shower of beams from Queen which are Lightspeed and Henry Queen was able to hit Sanji meaning it was faster.That's not even a statement for Queen though. Nor is it a clear lightspeed statement.
Not only can I not find any evidence Henry Queen is that fast on his page (or even a mention of that technique, but it might be written as Henry Blazer) but this is Hiding CalculationsOne Piece: Sanji Disappears
vsbattles.fandom.com
Hiding calculations is the practice of trying to avoid calculating a feat in order to be able to use the result in another calculation. In other words it is the practice of trying to fool people into not noticing that calc stacking is being used.
This usually occurs if a feat is quantified per a rule of thumb instead of precisely calculated. A typical example would be a character dodging a bullet from a short distance being ranked as "Supersonic" and then using that ranking to calculate the speed of another character, whose speed one can compare to the former in some feat.
It's not.That comes from the 3D2Y novel/ova iirc idk if it’s accepted canon here
It wasn't Ray, this actually comes from vivre card databook iirc. But as far as I know this mention refers to advanced users of Kenbun and Queen and Sanji do not fit on it.Didn't Ray state that good kenbun can let you react to light?
That's doesn't say advanced. Just very good.It wasn't Ray, this actually comes from vivre card databook iirc. But as far as I know this mention refers to advanced users of Kenbun and Queen and Sanji do not fit on it.
This was accepted talking about armament haki or not observation haki
2 Staff Agree (KT, DDM)What are the staff conclusions here so far?
It really isn't.Even with the (not very compelling, mind you) evidence of lightspeed reactions being used that were posted after my initial thoughts it's still hiding calculations
That's to be saved for a CRT. It has no bearing on the math.That's a really strange thing to say when I can look at the calc and clearly see that Queen's reactions are scaled to one of his attacks that (supposedly) goes at lightspeed, which does indeed align with the definition of hiding calculations and bloats the calc significantly past what it should be.
As you just confirmed, this is a feat where you are scaling Queen's reactions off a rule of thumb feat, which is not allowed. If you still can't understand that, it's not my problem.Hiding calculations is the practice of trying to avoid calculating a feat in order to be able to use the result in another calculation. In other words it is the practice of trying to fool people into not noticing that calc stacking is being used.
This usually occurs if a feat is quantified per a rule of thumb instead of precisely calculated. A typical example would be a character dodging a bullet from a short distance being ranked as "Supersonic" and then using that ranking to calculate the speed of another character, whose speed one can compare to the former in some feat.
While it is acceptable to rank a character by such a self-evident feat without a calculation, one should keep in mind that the unwritten calculation is only skipped due to being trivial, but is still the justification for the ranking. Hence calc stacking will still be an issue for such feats.
Its still on the page.That serene blitz calc got nuked I thought
That which exists without my knowledge, exists without my consentThis sort of thing has been accepted before(i.e Fairy Tail Selene Blitz calc though I am not very familiar with that situation)