- 18,393
- 14,323
Has been already explained? Where? I did not see a single argument against Garham's true emptiness?It doesn't. And has already been explained.
I'll repeat, get staff
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has been already explained? Where? I did not see a single argument against Garham's true emptiness?It doesn't. And has already been explained.
I'll repeat, get staff
More like we're waiting for an unbiased person to review it.While Graham's true emptiness without the source (fundamental aspect of existence) does fulfill the requirements you asked for, now it's just a case of waiting for someone on the team who doesn't dislike Maou Gakuin to arrive (Impossible).
ActuallySpaceMan made a great point. Even one of your own supporters agreed.Has been already explained? Where? I did not see a single argument against Garham's true emptiness?
Both I think, it's kind of hard for anyone on the team to at least put up with Maou Gakuin.More like we're waiting for an unbiased person to review it.
No he did not even comment a single word on Garham's true emptiness? Use crtl + F and find me the keyword where he commented on it?ActuallySpaceMan made a great point. Even one of your own supporters agreed.
If you can't get stuff, and keep dragging this one then no one is going to review it.
In fact, the only thing he proved is that Graham has NEP2, but he didn't say anything about Graham's "true void", he didn't even mention the fact that Graham's "true void" existed even without the source, as the his comment was before explaining about the true emptiness.ActuallySpaceMan made a great point. Even one of your own supporters agreed.
If you can't get stuff, and keep dragging this one then no one is going to review it.
HereAlright, I'm about to break this down from my understanding, any sarcasm is unwelcomed.
1; Graham lacks a source currently and still does not qualify for Type 5 Aspect.
2; What makes Order so fundamental is that without Order there is no existence, Graham already lacks existence so this changes nothing.
3; Order is more conceptual than normal conceptual stuff but is still conceptual and therefore not qualifying as Aspect Type 5. Plot or whatever is irrelevant as that is also not Type 5.
4; Fate & Laws are not accepted as Type 5 by themselves and it has to be stated that they are fundamental DIRECTLY. Saying Order is Law & Fate and without Order you don't exist just loops back into #2.
So how do we solve this? List one thing, just one, just one fundamental aspect of Order that is not related to the Mind, Body, Soul nor related to Concepts, Information, Laws, or Fate.
Just one single thing that is not "His entire existence on a more fundamental level" cause you need some sort of scan that says exactly that.
Exactly my point because he was not even aware of it till @EldemadeDityjon mention it and yet he did not respond on itIn fact, the only thing he proved is that Graham has NEP2, but he didn't say anything about Graham's "true void", he didn't even mention the fact that Graham's "true void" existed even without the source, as the his comment was before explaining about the true emptiness.
He did, and that's Nep 2In fact, the only thing he proved is that Graham has NEP2, but he didn't say anything about Graham's "true void", he didn't even mention the fact that Graham's "true void" existed even without the source, as the his comment was before explaining about the true emptiness.
"1; Graham lacks a source currently and still does not qualify for Type 5 Aspect."Here
Alright, now follow me step by step and use crtl + F and show me with gyazo (free screenshotting web app) and upload it on imgur (free uploading web app) where he exactly mentioned Garham's emptinessHere
No LMAO, NEP2 comes from the fact that Graham is non-existent, and doesn't exist without the source, don't contradict yourself again please, it's getting ugly.He did, and that's Nep 2
Yes. NEP 2 aspect type 1, 2 and 3"1; Graham lacks a source currently and still does not qualify for Type 5 Aspect."
That? LMAO, he's contradicting himself, he and you said that the character needs to exist even without the foundation of existence, things like mind, soul, body and etc. And just what does Graham's true emptiness do, is it really contradicting itself now?
You don't even know how nep works.No LMAO, NEP2 comes from the fact that Graham is non-existent, and doesn't exist without the source, don't contradict yourself again please, it's getting ugly.
Here ^^ @Yemma670Alright, now follow me step by step and use crtl + F and show me with gyazo (free screenshotting web app) and upload it on imgur (free uploading web app) where he exactly mentioned Garham's emptiness
Perhaps because aspect 5 was never discussed for Graham?Yes. NEP 2 aspect type 1, 2 and 3
He mentioned that. No aspect type 5 anywhere at all
NEP2 and its first source, even before it was destroyed, from a look at the profile (even if the real void is too), there was no way to put aspect 5 for Graham as this has never been discussed before.Make the crt messy, by repetition and this thread won't go anywhere.
Most staff aren't interested in LN verses to begin with . Just get staff before this gets too long and messy. That is the advise I'll give
No aspect type 5 FATE AND LAWNEP2 and its first source, even before it was destroyed, from a look at the profile (even if the real void is too), there was no way to put aspect 5 for Graham as this has never been discussed before.
Honestly, it would be easier without you here (no need to contradict each other), you and he mention that the character needs to exist even without the fundamental aspect of existence (mind, body, soul), and Graham's true emptiness existed without the source ( that's all that and a little more), and then immediately says that it's not aspect 5?
Repetition doesn't make my point any more valid, but you contradicting yourself doesn't make it any more invalid either.YOU DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING RELEVANT AT ALL.
You think repetition makes your point more valid?? Christ
Pin this comment to staff.Alright, I'm about to break this down from my understanding, any sarcasm is unwelcomed.
1; Graham lacks a source currently and still does not qualify for Type 5 Aspect.
2; What makes Order so fundamental is that without Order there is no existence, Graham already lacks existence so this changes nothing.
3; Order is more conceptual than normal conceptual stuff but is still conceptual and therefore not qualifying as Aspect Type 5. Plot or whatever is irrelevant as that is also not Type 5.
4; Fate & Laws are not accepted as Type 5 by themselves and it has to be stated that they are fundamental DIRECTLY. Saying Order is Law & Fate and without Order you don't exist just loops back into #2.
So how do we solve this? List one thing, just one, just one fundamental aspect of Order that is not related to the Mind, Body, Soul nor related to Concepts, Information, Laws, or Fate.
Just one single thing that is not "His entire existence on a more fundamental level" cause you need some sort of scan that says exactly that.
Alright. I bid you Good luck on your crt.Repetition doesn't make my point any more valid, but you contradicting yourself doesn't make it any more invalid either.
Ok, you are trying to explain to me that Graham's True Emptiness exists without a source which is a Fundamental Concept?Repetition doesn't make my point any more valid, but you contradicting yourself doesn't make it any more invalid either.
Bruh, you don't know anything about maou gakuin, that explains everything. Source has nothing to do with destiny and law, but the fundamental concept of existence, something that exists beyond the mind, soul and body, present, past and future.No aspect type 5 FATE AND LAW
None of which are fundamental, and you refuse to mention the fundamental laws, so no
"However, if the Almighty's sword is not sheathed, the power of the divine sword will annihilate the source of the person who pulls it out, present, past, and future."
|
If it has nothing to do with destiny and law then close the crt.Bruh, you don't know anything about maou gakuin, that explains everything. Source has nothing to do with destiny and law, but the fundamental concept of existence, something that exists beyond the mind, soul and body, present, past and future.
Source
The fundamental concept of existence that all living things hold within them. An excellent magician can be reincarnated with the memories of their life kept in their source, and even if the physical body perishes, as long as the source is intact, they can be revived.
To begin with, magic power is created from the magical source in our bodies. To put it simply, it's the soul, the psyche, but the source exists even deeper in the abyss, and it's what makes us who we are.
"However, if the Almighty's sword is not sheathed, the power of the divine sword will annihilate the source of the person who pulls it out, present, past, and future."
The fundamental concept of existence that all living things hold within them. An excellent magician can be reincarnated with the memories of their life kept in their source, and even if the physical body perishes, as long as the source is intact, they can be revived.
Idealistic Nonexistence: The character doesn't exist in a sense further beyond conventional nonexistence. In terms of binary, this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence.Conceptual Nonexistence: These are characters for which one or multiple concepts, that are necessary for their own existence, are nonexistent.
Lacking a source qualifies for Aspect Type 2.
NEP2 is basically the concept of nothing, a place where there are no concepts, that doesn't qualify for NEP2, you probably don't know much about the other NEPS besides 5.Conceptual Nonexistence: These are characters for which one or multiple concepts, that are necessary for their own existence, are nonexistent.
Lacking a source qualifies for Aspect Type 2.
I was just explaining what a source is, I said that the source itself has nothing to do with laws or destiny, as what is being discussed here is not what the source is.If it has nothing to do with destiny and law then close the crt.
This crt was meant for aspect type 5 law and fate
Are you seriously belittling me right now? Considering I made the Sun Wukong Profile who minds you have the most OP Infinitely Layered Nep Type 2 on the site I would assume I know more than NEPS besides Type 5.NEP2 is basically the concept of nothing, a place where there are no concepts, that doesn't qualify for NEP2, you probably don't know much about the other NEPS besides 5.
You said that a character that has no source (something that exists beyond mind, soul, body), has NEP2...as far as I know NEP2 and conventional nonexistence, and not a character that doesn't have mind, soul and body.. .Are you seriously belittling me right now? Considering I made the Sun Wukong Profile who minds you have the most OP Infinitely Layered Nep Type 2 on the site I would assume I know more than NEPS besides Type 5.
Beings more Nonexistent than NEP Type 2 beyond Fundamental Existence does not qualify for Aspect Type 5. How do I know? Because Sun Wukong has that times infinity and it's still not why he qualified for having Aspect Type 5. You guys are simply wrong in this context, gather some scans and try again but don't just sit there telling anyone who denies your views that they're wrong.
And this CRT is not just about Graham existing even without the source, have you seen the CRT links?Are you seriously belittling me right now? Considering I made the Sun Wukong Profile who minds you have the most OP Infinitely Layered Nep Type 2 on the site I would assume I know more than NEPS besides Type 5.
Beings more Nonexistent than NEP Type 2 beyond Fundamental Existence does not qualify for Aspect Type 5. How do I know? Because Sun Wukong has that times infinity and it's still not why he qualified for having Aspect Type 5. You guys are simply wrong in this context, gather some scans and try again but don't just sit there telling anyone who denies your views that they're wrong.