- 14,986
- 1,877
I dont really care about 1 being over the other but the DB is supporting canon.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Narutoverse Calc Fixing
- Thread starter The_Causality
- Start date
- Status
- 829
- 168
Vaporizing your soul is basically a flowery language, to say that your life was lost in this suicide attack. It is not very difficult to see this in what was said and it was literally what I understood when I read what was written in DB.!
Disqualifying information, based on flowery language, is ridiculous!
Disqualifying information, based on flowery language, is ridiculous!
- 1,673
- 289
Wether or not an attack is actually vaporizing or not should be looked at in a case-by-case basis, databooks don't override visuals so if they aren't corroborated by the feat in specific it shouldn't be used to assume vaporization.
Also, just because a technique vaporized something once doesn't mean it's always going to do so and it's faulty to assume so, so it's better if people look at feats from the same type of techniques individually instead of assuming they all do the same level of damage.
Also, just because a technique vaporized something once doesn't mean it's always going to do so and it's faulty to assume so, so it's better if people look at feats from the same type of techniques individually instead of assuming they all do the same level of damage.
- 8,753
- 1,617
I merely addressed that his soul burning up but still being usable at all would make no sense. It's obviously flowerly language, but statements like that are the kind that causes confusion.
And again, at no point did I say DB was incorrect or unusable or doesn't support canon, but I would hope Astral King and others knew that DB being above the main canon is not a thing at all in here.
And again, at no point did I say DB was incorrect or unusable or doesn't support canon, but I would hope Astral King and others knew that DB being above the main canon is not a thing at all in here.
- 6,976
- 1,344
quick question, why are Naruto and Sasuke back to 5-B?
- 6,014
- 2,122
- Thread starter
- #88
Because the downgrade has been rejected.Hagane no Saiyajin said:
- 14,409
- 1,692
It's in bmw fans blog. Just look for it on his profile under blogs
- 14,409
- 1,692
This threads started to go around in circles
- 4,487
- 732
Biju Bombs are Meant to Vaporize. It's a considerable Reach to claim it's not Vaporization based on this reasoning that Small Debris still exists. And BTW, put emphasis on "Small Debris". It's a nitpick more than anything and the feats lean heavily towards Vaporizatioanyways. Dropping it down to Violent fragmentation is a blatant downplay and less accurate than using Vaporization again as the feats heavily lean towards Vaporization regardless.
- 6,014
- 2,122
- Thread starter
- #96
necro bump
- 31,687
- 28,268
> Violent fragmentation is a blatant downplay and less accurate than using Vaporization again as the feats heavily lean towards Vaporization regardless.
I agree that Violent Fragmentation is a downplay, but some feats performed with Biju Bombs look more like they belong to Pulverization than Vaporization.
I agree that Violent Fragmentation is a downplay, but some feats performed with Biju Bombs look more like they belong to Pulverization than Vaporization.
- 4,327
- 2,979
Pulverization sounds more reasonable, it's definitely beyond violent fragmentation.
- 8,204
- 1,380
No....Now that's downplay right there. It's always been Vaporization
EDIT: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:M3X/Naruto:_Vaporization_for_Bijuu_Bomb
EDIT: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:M3X/Naruto:_Vaporization_for_Bijuu_Bomb
- 1,673
- 289
I'm not sure you can call something with visible debri vaporization without an explicit statement suggesting otherwise.
penis
- 4,327
- 2,979
Where is the CRT where it was denied?
- 4,327
- 2,979
You'd need a CRT to pass such a thing to allow for discussion.
- 26,160
- 3,654
Ant is many things, but not a Naruto expert.
And knowing him, he likely said something along the lines of "that should be alright then" or "that seems to make sense", which on it's own means just about nothing.
A proper CRT hould very much be held. I mean, if only the very edges had rubble, you could argue that obviously by that point some rubble would be pushed aside instead of being vaporized, but it's still an impotant enough thing to make a proper discusion of it.
And knowing him, he likely said something along the lines of "that should be alright then" or "that seems to make sense", which on it's own means just about nothing.
A proper CRT hould very much be held. I mean, if only the very edges had rubble, you could argue that obviously by that point some rubble would be pushed aside instead of being vaporized, but it's still an impotant enough thing to make a proper discusion of it.
- 1,870
- 336
If there's visible debris in the dust then why would vaporization be used? Even going by the Databook it supports the notion that the material is pulverized not vaporized completely. '''He can turn almost everything in his line of sight into dust or ash.''' going by that description alone supports that Bijudama's can pulverize without a doubt. I can see vaporization being legit but only has a high end whole pulverization would be the safest end.
- 31,687
- 28,268
. . . You're saying that it isn't up for discussion at all?
- 31,687
- 28,268
Discussions aren't usually settled on blogs, they have to actually be implemented in threads.
Why is posting of threads relevant here at all?
Why is posting of threads relevant here at all?
- 31,687
- 28,268
Unfortunately in many cases, I can only do so much. But besides that, that isn't relevant to the current discussion.
- 31,687
- 28,268
If I could snap my fingers and finish them all up, I would. As it happens I'm working on several calcs at the moment that should go towards resolving most threads.
Regarding this thread though, I'm happy letting someone else create the discussion regarding the Biju Bombs.
Regarding this thread though, I'm happy letting someone else create the discussion regarding the Biju Bombs.
- 14,409
- 1,692
Why is this still open. Staff has already disagreed on other blogs and thread about this. It's been agreed that it's vaporization and even Kep had to give input
Did anyone even read the comments in this thread as well instead of bringing up the same arguments
Did anyone even read the comments in this thread as well instead of bringing up the same arguments
- Status
Similar threads
