- 21,469
- 30,790
Nvm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was thinking about that, it's possible.Weird idea that popped in my head, but can we use the radius to depth ratio of the combined Bijuudama and apply it to the radius of the individual bombs for their depths?
@DontTalkDT @Damage3245 is that fine?Cant hurt to play around with it and see if it yields reasonable results.
As in it should be less than assuming depth = bijuudama height.
That would be setting a pretty troublesome precedent, I think. It should fall under calc stacking.Weird idea that popped in my head, but can we use the radius to depth ratio of the combined Bijuudama and apply it to the radius of the individual bombs for their depths?
Fair, I only suggested it since they’re all technically the “same” attack, ie both were Bijuudama.That would be setting a pretty troublesome precedent, I think. It should fall under calc stacking.
Assume a depthAnd if we don’t find a way what’s our fall back?
Use just the mountains*Assume a depth
Axe the feat
We need a valid reason to use the mountains, which we don't haveUse just the mountains*
I mean the depth of the explosion of the crater below the mountain, are we axing that and just using the mountain?did they not destroy the mountains
Yeah that’s my suggestion if we can’t get a crater volume.I mean the depth of the explosion of the crater below the mountain, are we axing that and just using the mountain?
Does this mean the feat would be downgraded if we didnt?So I was uh talking with some fellowmrksfriends, and I was wondering, do we accept vaporization off of these?
This looks like it’s creating a created via pulverizing the ground (we see debris particles flying around).
This is more ambiguous but still hard to tell.
Maybe there’s better shots or statements that explain otherwise. I apologize if I’m treading on a beaten path here.
;—;Does this mean the feat would be downgraded if we didnt?
Ah i see, good.
I’ll just see myself out. I’ve been told databooks say vapeAh i see, good.
Yeah we accept Bijuudama as vaporizationSo I was uh talking with some fellowmrksfriends, and I was wondering, do we accept vaporization off of these?
Where, could i see that?I’ll just see myself out. I’ve been told databooks say vape
Where, could i see that?No you are not escaping so early on chief.
Ask the other mrks let me leave!!!!
Nervous whistlingBut what if they dont know where exactly it is, that'd be rude to do to them no
FixedKingTempest16/Sandbox3
vsbattles.fandom.com
Ninja'd
Wrong.Bijuu make booms
vsbattles.fandom.com
Wait...Weeeell, as I just commented on my blog, I don't think one can use the depth x 0.18 thing on craters caused by explosions. The articles are for stuff like lunar and asteroid craters, which would probably been created via meteors and stuff.
Meanwhile, explosions in general don't necessarily create any crater whatsoever.
A bunch.Wait...
How many calcs does this affect?
All I can name is the Juubi feat. What else in Naruto uses this method?A bunch.
I wish it was that easy. We'd need to have the calc members discuss between the newly accepted on and the currently accepted to see which is more accurate.If it's accepted and resolves all of DTs issues, it can be added to the verse page, applied, and this thread can be closed no?
Ehhhhhand this thread can be closed no?
And this tooI wish it was that easy. We'd need to have the calc members discuss between the newly accepted on and the currently accepted to see which is more accurate.