- 11,952
- 16,597
The fact that the chakra thread may be concluded before this is equally sad and hilarious lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty sure the Chakra Thread is done now.The Chakra Thread will definitly be done before this
Confirmed donePretty sure the Chakra Thread is done now.
I think I'll scream if that happens.Watch the databook stats thread finish before this one as well
I think that’s the story for everyone with this thread…this threads been going on for so long that i forgot what its about
What needs to be updatedWe're waiting for DT to update his calc.
For the individual TBB, he only calculated the mountain destruction not the crater it left behind.What needs to be updated
Other thread wasn't going to be controversial since it didn't actually involve changing any ratings yet.I still can't believe we finished what should've been a super ******* controversial topic before we finished this thread.
They'll keep it regardless of this thread's conclusion. Damage's method isn't incorrect. This is just an alternative method of calcing it.This thread decides whether ppl below tier 5 still keep the values for the bijuudamas
They'll keep it regardless of this thread's conclusion. Damage's method isn't incorrect. This is just an alternative method of calcing it.
And tbh, if the calc people don't feel like updating the calc for whatever reason, which is totally fine we all have a life after all, then I think it might be best to just close this thread honestly.
Weeeell, as I just commented on my blog, I don't think one can use the depth x 0.18 thing on craters caused by explosions. The articles are for stuff like lunar and asteroid craters, which would probably been created via meteors and stuff.KingTempest16/Sandbox3
vsbattles.fandom.com
Ninja'd
Iirc damage pixel scales the depth of the crater, can we just replace .18r with the pixel scales depth?Weeeell, as I just commented on my blog, I don't think one can use the depth x 0.18 thing on craters caused by explosions. The articles are for stuff like lunar and asteroid craters, which would probably been created via meteors and stuff.
Meanwhile, explosions in general don't necessarily create any crater whatsoever.
If the pixel scaling is done right, then probably yes.Iirc damage pixel scales the depth of the crater, can we just replace .18r with the pixel scales depth?
KT updated his sandbox, is it good to go?If the pixel scaling is done right, then probably yes.
On that note, I don't think I've actually pixelscaled the depth of the crater for the individual Biju Bombs on that calc... So if we went with that, it'd need fixing.Iirc damage pixel scales the depth of the crater, can we just replace .18r with the pixel scales depth?
Then what's this?On that note, I don't think I've actually pixelscaled the depth of the crater for the individual Biju Bombs on that calc... So if we went with that, it'd need fixing.
Then what's this?
That amber line is scaling the height of the explosion because I naively assumed that the depth would be equal to the height, but there's nothing pointing the craters out to be perfectly hemispherical.Then what's this?
I'm referring to the green line which was calculated at 48 pixels highThat amber line is scaling the height of the explosion because I naively assumed that the depth would be equal to the height, but there's nothing pointing the craters out to be perfectly hemispherical.
The combined Biju Bomb shown later shows that the depth is nowhere near the maximum height of it. So the depth needs to be figured out a different way than scaling the height of the Biju Bomb.
That's the height of the mountain.I'm referring to the green line which was calculated at 48 pixels high
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, but that's the height of the mountain?That's the height of the mountain.