My Hero Academia Revisions

[VersusJunkie54]

Will All Might and All for One see any tiering changes?

 

[Therefir]

No, but I always wonder if All Might's rain feat has been calced.

 

[Andytrenom]

I am going to ask this, could the scene where cat lady sends a mud tsunami towards the students be used to find durabilty. Just say Yes or No.

 

[Damage3245]

Personally, I don't think so.

 

[Therefir]

No.

 

[Andytrenom]

Okay, but why exactly?

 

[Therefir]

Because only a small part of the attack is hitting each student.

 

[Therefir]

Also, it seems that the attack only pushes them.

 

[Andytrenom]

@Therefir. I guess she would have the control to make her attacks less hazardous than an actual instance of multiple tonnes of the earth ramming into someone.

I am not really sure why you are pointing out that the wave pushes them.

 

[Andytrenom]

Should Iida have Statistics Amplification through Recipro?

 

[AidenBrooks999]

This feat can be calced?

It was only calc to be Class M forma lifting. Bit I don't it would surpass the +5 tons I got from the crater

 

[Therefir]

Bump, also the crater was made by Monster Chisaki, not Deku 100%.

 

[Andytrenom]

I thought the the Crater was made by the girls.

 

[Therefir]

That was in other place.

 

[Therefir]

Mmm no I'm confused now.

 

[Damage3245]

Can you post the full page instead of just that cropped panel?

EDIT: And about Iida having Statistics Amplification, I guess that'd be fine but it only affects his speed and for a short time.

 

[Therefir]

 

[Damage3245]

Those aren't the pages that you got the original panel from...

 

[Therefir]

We are talking about Aiden's calc.

 

[Therefir]

Is not the same crater, but Monster Chisaki and Deku 100% should scale anyways.

 

[Therefir]

This is correct or not?

 

[Andytrenom]

When was it decided that 8-A isn't valid?

 

[Therefir]

Deku's 100% have a plenty of 8-C to High 8-C calcs, and Todoroki's fire have been calced at High 8-C.

 

[Andytrenom]

Okay I understand the reasons, but when was it decided that he should be downgraded.

 

[Damage3245]

That shouldn't be listed as ' 1,000,000% '. Horikoshi confirms it was just written as a drawn-out 100% in the volumes.

 

[Andytrenom]

@Damage The attack name is still 1000000% though.

 

[Damage3245]

It's still written as a 100% attack. Just because it's written in a dramatic way of him drawing it out like he's saying "ONE HUUUUUNDRED PERCENT!" doesn't mean we should put in a misleading million percent.

 

[Therefir]

Still one-shotted Muscular.

 

[Damage3245]

I agree he still one-shotted Muscular with it, but it's not written correctly as it is now.

 

[Andytrenom]

@Damage The profile isn't trying to say "Higher when literally drawing out1000 000% of One for All", but "Higher when using an attack that has 1000000% in its name".

 

[Therefir]

What do you suggest?

 

[Damage3245]

Writing it as 100% Delaware-Detroit Smash.

 

[Therefir]

I agree with Andy, we can't just change the name, even if Deku was exaggerating.

 

[Therefir]

Chisaki's keys should be: "At least 9-A, likely higher | High 8-C"

What do you think about it?

 

[Damage3245]

You're not changing the name. You're putting it what it accurately is.

I don't see a problem with that for Chisaki.

 

[Andytrenom]

I actually still doubt whether chisaki should scale to Deku.

 

[Therefir]

Chisaki is not scaling from Deku, he is scaling from the girls who made that crater with a guy who merged with Chisaki.

 

[Andytrenom]

Scaling to a feat done with the combined might of 2 characters who are very high tier in the verse will require some justification.

 

[Therefir]

Maybe "At least High 8-C" is more correct since Monster Chisaki and Deku 100% should be stronger than that dragon girl.

 

[Andytrenom]

Why should Monster Chisaki be stronger than one of the top 10 ranked heroes exactly?