Oh man at least try to understand. Her making that rule doesn't make it a statement. Her rule is nkt a cannon source because it can have limitations. It doesn't necessarily have to be a limitation but due to the logic of it being able to be one I think calcing the size would give more logical results
Headcanon.
Nothing indicates that. You have to prove that it's something she can make as you made the claim she is able to do so. The burden of proof is on you. Just because I am the that started the argument doesn't mean I have the burden of proof
The same way saying she can Def do a 2km giant is.
If she has a limit, her quirk doesn’t work.
She said she could do it, not me.
That's not proof bevause it has limits it can't surpass. She has definetly imposed rules like "I am stronger than all might" but that was above her limit so it didn't work. Just because she said so it's not a factual statement
That's not the case at all. Tee rule will not fail but be limited. We see that by looking at her strength. She says I am infinitely string but can't surpass a certain limit
If that’s the case, the giant would not have formed at all.
She never said she could successfully do so man she only made that rule. You are making things uo at this point
What is the wording for her super strength.
Nothing indicates it would have completely failed
Headcanon. Prove she could not successfully do it. Her quirk let it happen with no difficulties and she never remarks it is limited.
She states she couldn't surpass her limit at strength when testing words.
Prove that it failed but still formed but at a reduced size.
I want the size of the giant to be calculated instead of assumed lol
Yeah I’m fine with the one missile, just that I believe the Nomus should be able to take a bit more. Kinda a head canon but
Where is the no limits fallacy?
Prove that it entirely failed?
What is the exact wording for her super strength. You’re saying she has a limit, tell me what that limit is. I know how strong she is, you don’t, because you’re creating limits that you know nothing about or don’t exist.
We literally don’t have a reason to calc it when she already states it
He assumed that size had no restrictions like physical strenght has. He literally said that since there was no shown limit there is none in one of his previous comments
Her rules are not statements cause they have limits. She can state whatever she wants but that doesn't make it a factual statement.
It didn’t fail at all. It perfectly formed a 1000x size model of herself.
But it's literally not a statement as I elaborated just know
No, your reading comprehension took it that way. Playing devil’s advocate is fun tho
if she says it's 1,000x bigger than she is and the only thing contradicting it is a manga not drawn to scale because it's not perfect especially for huge things, MHA has had this problem many times, pixel scaling will never be better than official sizes (we literally downgraded the cube feat from like Mountain to Large Town because of that IIRC)
You have no way of proving her statement isn’t factual
The attack against shigaraki didn't work cause of his existential crisis and the I won't decay did work
It is a statement. Her power doesn’t work if she tries to do something beyond its power. It worked here and she noted nothing wrong. Prove the construct isn’t 1000x her size, as she specified, with actual evidence from the story
No, it didn’t work. She states it was past her limit of endurance boost.
The downs along of that would probably get City level instead of island level. More consistent with missiles and Nomus. And her rule is not a statement with 100%truth to it as I elaborated 10000 times
That's it would fail is not proven
No, you haven’t.
Prove overexaggeration creates a limit for her air constructs
It did look at the chapter again
It didn’t, she literally died from it and says it exceeded the cap
