- 3,074
- 676
Surely not 130 meters wide.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look at the gif, you’ll see a crater where it lands.Do we see it actually crashing?
Is anyone willing to do that?It already was accepted, though honestly I think we should try and make more accurate measurements than relying on MatPat.
That’s fine. There’s another scene where it free falls a few meters. It’s when Bob knocks it off the building. So using PE for that might be better.The calc seems to be assuming that it's free falling, which is weird since it's on that plane thingy with wings.
To me it pretty clearly slows the descent, like a paper plane of sorts. That last shot also doesn't look like free falling.
Well, I’ll fix that.
OOFActually, no, wait.
9 storeys is 38.7 meters since 4.3 times 9 is 38.7.
9.81 * 38.7 * 1045695.192= 396,995,041.79793 J or 0.0949 tons of TNT (Small Building level)
Well this sucks.
Oh that means Soldier 76 vs Mr. Incredible is fair. Woo-hoo!Actually, no, wait.
9 storeys is 38.7 meters since 4.3 times 9 is 38.7.
9.81 * 38.7 * 1045695.192= 396,995,041.79793 J or 0.0949 tons of TNT (Small Building level)
Well this sucks.
How are you getting the High 8-C value when I'm just getting 8-C with the new updated value?
It's 9.81^2 not just 9.81. Anyway it got accepted to can I apply the changes?How are you getting the High 8-C value when I'm just getting 8-C with the new updated value?
9.81 * 4,110,939.5742 * 38.7= 1.56070587653e+9 J or 0.3730176569144359 tons of TNT (Building level)
Bruh. Ok, I'll fix it.What Kieran said, the m/s^2 is just a unit, you wouldn't actually square the value itself.
Either way, guess Cap vs Incredible is back on track.
Pretty much, only way they could have scaled is if the missiles were right in front of her face (Or less than 23 cm away from her if you wanna get technical, yes, this does account for cross-sectional area), which is definitely not the case in her situation, as in the actual scene she is well far away from the sides of the plane where the missiles actually hit and then exploded.Plus the inverse square law would mean she wouldn't take the full blast. She should definitely be downgraded.
Jack Jack himself also have several feats missing from him, such as him casually breaking through walls in his giant form (clip is not in a high quality but this is the only one I could find for it)One feat I do recall is during Edna Mode's walkthrough of the suits. One of the suits tank direct Missile blasts too. iirc it was Helens but I believe Edna was making the point that all of the suits were similar in that manor. I'll see if I can get the clip.
Edit: Clip Here. There's some stuff mentioned on here that are missing from all of the families Profiles. Such as Jack Jacks suit being completely bulletproof.
True, Edna did indeed say that all the suits were similar.One feat I do recall is during Edna Mode's walkthrough of the suits. One of the suits tank direct Missile blasts too. iirc it was Helens but I believe Edna was making the point that all of the suits were similar in that manor. I'll see if I can get the clip.
Edit: Clip Here. There's some stuff mentioned on here that are missing from all of the families Profiles. Such as Jack Jacks suit being completely bulletproof.
I mean, the suits don't fully absorb energy since we see the characters still get hurt, nevermind that their faces are still exposed, so they likely couldn't survive a missile anyway (unless they have dura feats above that level obv)
We could have "X normally, up to Y with suit" or something along those lines. It feels weird to me to leave out the suits durability when the movie made such a point of them.I mean, the suits don't fully absorb energy since we see the characters still get hurt, nevermind that their faces are still exposed, so they likely couldn't survive a missile anyway (unless they have dura feats above that level obv)