Bobsican
He/Him- 21,177
- 6,089
Given that this page clearly has higher standards in general compared to the verses list, I think it may be best to do a revision on it in this subforum.
Anyways, I've been noticing that some more topics could also be included, as they're common topics that totally deserve broad support to evaluate over only the input from those into a given verse:
- Verse-specific Powers and Abilities: There's multiple standards for them as outlined in the Editing Rules, but even so I'm still noticing some misuse for newly made ones, especially as it seems usually only those into the given verse it's for are notified about it whenever a new one is proposed, so having a subsection for this here would be good to keep quality on them by ensuring someone knowledgeable on their editing standards evaluates them.
- Explanation pages: Similar to the above, a common issue is that a explanation page ends up fitting more like a verse-specific power page or vice-versa, and having users that can generally evaluate this kind of formatting would be appreciated. It may have to be noted that this wouldn't extend to blog posts, however, as blog posts have way more lenient standards.
This may not be much, but I think the addition of those two would be productive to ensure proper evaluation of content featured on the site on those areas.
Such new subsections may start out as empty, but even now we still have some subsections with no users at all in the KML Wiki Terminology page, so this can be fixed over time.
Anyways, I've been noticing that some more topics could also be included, as they're common topics that totally deserve broad support to evaluate over only the input from those into a given verse:
- Verse-specific Powers and Abilities: There's multiple standards for them as outlined in the Editing Rules, but even so I'm still noticing some misuse for newly made ones, especially as it seems usually only those into the given verse it's for are notified about it whenever a new one is proposed, so having a subsection for this here would be good to keep quality on them by ensuring someone knowledgeable on their editing standards evaluates them.
- Explanation pages: Similar to the above, a common issue is that a explanation page ends up fitting more like a verse-specific power page or vice-versa, and having users that can generally evaluate this kind of formatting would be appreciated. It may have to be noted that this wouldn't extend to blog posts, however, as blog posts have way more lenient standards.
This may not be much, but I think the addition of those two would be productive to ensure proper evaluation of content featured on the site on those areas.
Such new subsections may start out as empty, but even now we still have some subsections with no users at all in the KML Wiki Terminology page, so this can be fixed over time.
