Monika's Nonexistent Physiology upgrade

[StrymULTRA]

Try to do the crt like he tell maybie it's will be accepted

Nah, as you said is basic plot erasure, Type 2 NEP needs a better wording at this point

 

[YungManzi]

NEP 2 is not just about no existing beyond non physical so....

Yeah, it's about conceptual stuff, which is the problem. It's too specific.

For example. Even if erased DDLC characters could be given NEP type 1. Type 1 NEP would not fit them, why?

"the normal scope of the physical and metaphysical worlds, instead existing as an idea or other unconventional state. Such entities can be conceptualized by individuals, but do not exist in a physical or normal metaphysical form, such as a soul."

Erased characters in DDLC cannot be conceptualized by individuals. In fact, the narration itself can't say their name and no character remembers them.

It really should be reworked as a page, given this issue.

 

[StrymULTRA]

What about adding another Type of NEP?

Like, Type 1 remains as Type 1, Type 2 is the one for being erased from the Plot/Space-Time, and Type 3 is Conceptual one, since being erased from the Plot/Space-Time is still way superior than the Erasure regarding just the Body and Soul.

 

[InfiniteDay]

What about adding another Type of NEP?

Like, Type 1 remains as Type 1, Type 2 is the one for being erased from the Plot/Space-Time, and Type 3 is Conceptual one, since being erased from the Plot/Space-Time is still way superior than the Erasure regarding just the Body and Soul.

That's gonna cause alot of misconception, but I see it.

 

[StrymULTRA]

That's gonna cause alot of misconception, but I see it.

Not if we specify well with Notes too

 

[Regidian]

Well you can ask this with staff and made a crt about it, to justify the fact that some thing fall into the two and not enter properly in one

 

[StrymULTRA]

Done

 

[Regidian]

Ask staff to reply to it since will be view mostly by them

 

[StrymULTRA]

Well, project failed, and nothing of this will happen then.

 

[YungManzi]

Well, project failed, and nothing of this will happen then.

Seems like they still think the page needs to be revised though, just they don't agree with adding that type because I guess, it would somehow make an already complicated page more complicated?

I don't get it though.

I hate staff threads like that where everyone agrees that the proposed solution shouldn't be done, but nobody addresses the the prime issue at hand which spurred the solution that they don't agree with. Plot erasure is still something that, by wording on the pages, would not fall under type 1 or 2 but is clearly still NEP. So either change the wording or create a new type.