- 5,800
- 5,102
I agree anyway. I hate DDLC and its impact on gaming.I don't know if you noticed, but this CRT has already been accepted (although it has not been applied or closed).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree anyway. I hate DDLC and its impact on gaming.I don't know if you noticed, but this CRT has already been accepted (although it has not been applied or closed).
why ?, ddlc is good game tbh in my opinion.I agree anyway. I hate DDLC and its impact on gaming.
This is true.I don't know if you noticed, but this CRT has already been accepted (although it has not been applied or closed).
I think one more vote is needed because only @Dereck03 only agree and @Vietthai96 didn't vote and I am not should if @Phoenks votes counts here.Ok I'm back.
Personally I've applied the Concept stuff back then when the standards for Concept and Information weren't that much apart and defined as they're now (Concept defines the "what" X thing is while Information defines the "how" X thing operates, so I can see why the thinf can cause confusion as the difference is really blurry).
I just didn't realize that given how close these are (while still being fundamentally different), there must be an explicit mention if you want both at the same time, as one pretty much does all the stuff the other does (hence why we have standard regarding Metaphysical Aspects and their "order", as Plot for example does the exact same stuff as these two).
So I can see the thing about Information being the basis of everything, with Plot being its subset.
Also, regarding NEP Nature 2, that can go too, I think I've mentioned here before I changed my mind on it quite a bit before, as the context seems to be more about Monika overwriting the universe with the new version rather than literally blowing it up then remaking it.
I'll apply the thing myself when I have time on my laptop later today.
@ActuallySpaceMan42 did.I think one more vote is needed because only @Dereck03 only agree and @Vietthai96 didn't vote and I am not should if @Phoenks votes counts here.
ok didn't see but can make vote tally from next time so it easier to keep and eye on votes.
I believe you need 3 staff votes to apply the changes as it's tackling a controversial ability.
Viet is a mod now.I believe you need 3 staff votes to apply the changes as it's tackling a controversial ability.
well he didn't vote before and didn't mentioned anything about cm1 anyway.Viet is a mod now.
Basically, it is very difficult for a purely information-based cosmologist, where everything in existence is defined by information with cosmology being a game, to achieve anything conceptual without a more direct mention of concepts, since both IM and CM have equal capabilities on the wiki.Ok I'm back.
Personally I've applied the Concept stuff back then when the standards for Concept and Information weren't that much apart and defined as they're now (Concept defines the "what" X thing is while Information defines the "how" X thing operates, so I can see why the thinf can cause confusion as the difference is really blurry).
I just didn't realize that given how close these are (while still being fundamentally different), there must be an explicit mention if you want both at the same time, as one pretty much does all the stuff the other does (hence why we have standard regarding Metaphysical Aspects and their "order", as Plot for example does the exact same stuff as these two).
So I can see the thing about Information being the basis of everything, with Plot being its subset.
Also, regarding NEP Nature 2, that can go too, I think I've mentioned here before I changed my mind on it quite a bit before, as the context seems to be more about Monika overwriting the universe with the new version rather than literally blowing it up then remaking it.
I'll apply the thing myself when I have time on my laptop later today.
3 staff votes are for controversial verses like Dragon BallI believe you need 3 staff votes to apply the changes as it's tackling a controversial ability.
this is true, though IM is also equally hard to get if you do not have direct statement mention information or anything equivalent.Basically, it is very difficult for a purely information-based cosmologist, where everything in existence is defined by information with cosmology being a game, to achieve anything conceptual without a more direct mention of concepts, since both IM and CM have equal capabilities on the wiki.
Controversial abilities do also in a need for 3 staff votes for any verse. Concept, Plot, Info 2 and etc.3 staff votes are for controversial verses like Dragon Ball
Welp, applied it and removed the blog, as none seems to really have cared for, and I don't even disagree with it myself anymore.3 staff votes are for controversial verses like Dragon Ball
this is true, though IM is also equally hard to get if you do not have direct statement mention information or anything equivalent.
tbh i think the vote tally is already enough to applies due to the admin having x2 vote power compare to the thread mod.
Though anyway, after rereading the thread and evidence on DDLC profiles, i agree with CM removal
Close the thread thenWelp, applied it and removed the blog, as none seems to really have cared for, and I don't even disagree with it myself anymore.
This can be closed.