- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #81
Clarification that its an instant speed amp rather than gradual accleration lik the pag currently suggests
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Minor Weiss Revision
- Thread starter WeeklyBattles
- Start date
- Status
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #83
Because its shown to be?
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #85
To quote yourself from the other thread:
"You're saying that CRWBY needs to acknowledge every single speed amp for it to be canon?"
- 16,004
- 9,242
This is false equivalence. You're trying to prove that the glyphs Weiss used to assist Ruby aren't speed amping glyphs on the other thread. On this thread, you're trying to prove that Weiss' speed aping glyphs instantly increase your velocity without accelerating it over time.
You need to actually show proof for what you're saying here.
You need to actually show proof for what you're saying here.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #87
I did already, i showd proof that she has speed amping glyphs in this thread with explanations. The other thread has yet to prove that sped ampig glyphs were used in the speciic scne in qustion
- 16,004
- 9,242
All that happened in this thread was you saying acceleration and velocity are two seperate things.
Everyone then proceeded to tell you that acceleration is simply increasing velocity over time.
You have yet to refute the above, and you have yet to post worded evidence that Weiss' speed amp glyph increases speed instantly and not over time.
It fact it would be so counterintuitive for her to have more than one speed glyph active to increase speed since the original speed glyph should have already set her to the speed she needed to be. Why have multiple glyphs appear if one glyph has a set speed amp?
Everyone then proceeded to tell you that acceleration is simply increasing velocity over time.
You have yet to refute the above, and you have yet to post worded evidence that Weiss' speed amp glyph increases speed instantly and not over time.
It fact it would be so counterintuitive for her to have more than one speed glyph active to increase speed since the original speed glyph should have already set her to the speed she needed to be. Why have multiple glyphs appear if one glyph has a set speed amp?
Last edited:
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #89
To keep her speed constantly accelerated. Once she steps off the glyph her speed goes back to normal.
- 16,004
- 9,242
And you have proof of this? Let alone how incredibly contrived that is?
Please show us that her speed instantly returns to normal the moment she steps off the glyph. If she remains at the same velocity, the glyph isn't doing what you say it's doing.
Please show us that her speed instantly returns to normal the moment she steps off the glyph. If she remains at the same velocity, the glyph isn't doing what you say it's doing.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #91
- 16,004
- 9,242
What. How does that prove the speed amp wears off after she steps off them? She wanted to stop. If you're trying to prove to me that she doesn't maintain the same velocity after she steps off a glyph, you're going to have to post an instance where she doesn't intentionally stop after getting off a glyph.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #93
Because its the glyphs that ave th proprties. Once the person steps off of them they lose the effect.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #95
Because Weiss has never used her glyphs in that manner other than the instanc i showd you. At this point youre asking m to prov a ngativ
- 16,004
- 9,242
She used her glyphs like that in that one instance in a way that at best would work as supporting evidence and yet your interpretation of what the glyphs do is somehow more true than my interpretation of what the glyphs do?
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #97
Correct. Your intrpretatio is that the effcts of th glyphs persist after the person affctd by them has moved out of the glyph's radius, which is incorrect
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #99
And you have yet to post anything that supports your interpretation over mine. This works both ways my guy
- 16,004
- 9,242
^affects velocity, repulsion, and attraction
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #101
Yes? It affects those things for people who are standing on the glyphs, if thyre not on the glyphs theyre not affected by it
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #103
I have provn it, several times with the scans ive provided. Its your turn to disprov it with your own scans
- 16,004
- 9,242
This is circular. On the very basis that each of us don't have a very strong argument to begin with. I can't show you any more than that guidebook scan of what the glyphs do and you can't show me proof that the glyphs take you from 100 to 0 without the user trying to stop.
The only difference is that I'm not trying to argue for any specific interpretation of the mechanics of Weiss's glyphs. Rather, I'm trying to disprove your singular interpretation through showing you that it could literally be anything else and we don't have concrete proof it's any one thing.
The only difference is that I'm not trying to argue for any specific interpretation of the mechanics of Weiss's glyphs. Rather, I'm trying to disprove your singular interpretation through showing you that it could literally be anything else and we don't have concrete proof it's any one thing.
Abstractions
Femur Breaker
VS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Human Resources
- 2,639
- 2,827
All of this just because I said Ruby isn't being physically buffed to move faster but is rather being propelled, thus moving faster.
- 10,285
- 2,761
So...
Weekly went ahead and made the changes. Just thought I’d mention since they didn’t link the thread...
Weekly went ahead and made the changes. Just thought I’d mention since they didn’t link the thread...
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #108
It was acceptedWell I know for a fact that wasn't accepted yet
- 42,637
- 36,905
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #110
Ive postd multiple scans that prove my point. You have not. You need to post scans to prove your point. That is how dbating works.
azontr
He/Him- 40,519
- 50,160
You and Sir_Ovens were arguing, it was in no way accepted.
- 10,285
- 2,761
I’m going to have to reverse the changes since the thread wasn’t linked and discussions are still in effect
Loyd
He/Him- 3,161
- 1,209
wasnt this the conclusion before it was closed then re opened?
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #114
Yes
azontr
He/Him- 40,519
- 50,160
And then it was re-opened, and there still isn't a conclusion apparently. :/
- 8,127
- 12,355
How did you take “acceleration is correct wording because what you’re proposing is just acceleration” to mean that you were free to change the wording how you wish? She’s accelerating them when they come into contact with her glyphs.
Even if it takes 0.1 seconds for her semblance to effect the other persons body in order to accelerate them on contact with the glyph, that is change in speed over time.
You’re attempting to claim that Weiss’s base glyphs, not her actual time dilating ones, absolutely break the acceleration formula with the value of time being 0.
That’s a claim that requires quite a bit of evidence to go against a fundamental law of nature.
Even if it takes 0.1 seconds for her semblance to effect the other persons body in order to accelerate them on contact with the glyph, that is change in speed over time.
You’re attempting to claim that Weiss’s base glyphs, not her actual time dilating ones, absolutely break the acceleration formula with the value of time being 0.
That’s a claim that requires quite a bit of evidence to go against a fundamental law of nature.
- 20,062
- 10,846
Weekly that is a serious violation of rules if you edited the pages before we even made a conclusion. You are aware of this right?
- 8,127
- 12,355
“Agreed against” means they disagree.
I think you have, in fact, missed the words and meaning, my friend.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #120
She only has one interpretation of her glyphs, the interpretation outlined by the show
Okay then, here is a clip of Weiss using attraction glyphs to keep herself grouded while pushing back against the force of Flynt's trumpet, then falling off and losing th attraction effect when the force is removed
- Status
