Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't it the other way around? Not that it matters, they are not synonymous. Plot manipulation specifically refers to the ability to alter the narrative and events of a story directly, whereas reality warping encompasses a broader range of abilities that can affect the fabric of reality without necessarily controlling the storyโs plot. For example them changing the art style, voice acting and appearances. We literally have an explanation in verse where those events can be explained as Reality warping.You do know that plot manipulation is a subset of reality warping right?
Reversing time is a specific, concrete ability that clearly fits the definition of time manipulation. This is not ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ผ๐๐ to Celestialsapiens merely providing narrative justifications for retcons, which lack explicit demonstration of plot control. Just because something can be categorized under reality warping doesnโt mean it inherently possesses the same level of narrative control as plot manipulation.For instance, if some character reverses time, it's clear cut time manipulation feat or else someone calling it reality warping without diving deeper into the context is invalid.
Why does this seem like an attempt to dismiss the distinction between narrative devices and literal abilities? Rather than engaging with the argument at hand and attempt to dismiss the distinction between narrative devices and literal abilities it's essential to differentiate between how a narrative is structured versus simply altering reality. This distinction is crucial to understanding the charactersโ capabilities accurately.So I'd suggest you guys to broaden your perspective to see things consistent with each other.
They dont have to explicitly announce it but that doesnโt mean their actions or powers automatically fall into that category.It's literally what the uses of PM are. How do ya expect them to say, "hey we perform plot manipulation"
Clear cut statement for reality warping yes not for plot manipulation. The evidence is very lacking."Celestialsapiens change the Universe all the time"
It's a clear cut statement or who else could do it in-verse?
Author***This literally just confirms that authors use Celestialsapiens as a means to cover up retcons and changes in-verse which is consistent with Dan Riba's statement
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐น considering how limiting the evidence is i dont think this will pass as plot manipulation https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Reality_Warping#:~:text=Reality Warping (sometimes called Reality,any item already considered real.Hellformer said:
From the plot manipulation page, this where the abilities of Celestialsapiens seem to fit
- Users may be able transforms objects and individuals Reality Warping (sometimes called Reality Alteration or Reality Manipulation) is a term used to describe the ability to manipulate reality
- Users may be able to retroactively change the past, by changing what is recorded about the past in the plot
As I said above this can be explained as Reality warping rather than plot manipulation. From what i saw from the video it is explained that when Alien X recreated the "Universe" Dan Riba suggested that the writers used Alien Xโs reality-warping abilities as a convenient in-universe explanation for retcons or inconsistencies.Again, you're trying to merge them as if they're completely same. The writers literally use Celestialsapiens as a tool to justify their plot changes of the story for the readers to make sense about things happening in-verse.
Bruh what? Tell me you didn't even read the RW page lol. Plot manipulation is listed as one of the types of it.Isn't it the other way around?
Why are you jumping back to reality warping when the change in continuities between UAF and OV was justified via Celestialsapiens?Not that it matters, they are not synonymous. Plot manipulation specifically refers to the ability to alter the narrative and events of a story directly, whereas reality warping encompasses a broader range of abilities that can affect the fabric of reality without necessarily controlling the storyโs plot. For example them changing the art style, voice acting and appearances. We literally have an explanation in verse where those events can be explained as Reality warping.
The proofs are quite literally present in the OP. Plot manipulation is a subset of reality warping so you will obviously see the similarity in the overall outcome.They dont have to explicitly announce it but that doesnโt mean their actions or powers automatically fall into that category.
Plot manipulation is characterized by the ability to actively alter the narrative or events of a story. In the case of Celestialsapiens, while they might have powers that reshape reality, there is no clear evidence that they possess the conscious ability to rewrite the plot or control the storyline itself
Tell me what do the authors do when they decide to retcon something? Do they warp reality or change the plot of the show? And what if the author blames some in-verse character to make such changes?Clear cut statement for reality warping yes not for plot manipulation. The evidence is very lacking.
As explained with the prior example, you're simply confusing yourself with both the abilities. To repeat myself with some additions, Kevin's change in backstory changes results in an entirely new arc (rooters arc) which affects the continuity of the series and characters involved in it.Author***
These Retcons can still be explained in the scope of reality warping
1. ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ด: refers to changing the fabric of reality itselfโthings like altering physical laws, rewriting history, or recreating the universe. Celestialsapiens, particularly Alien X, have demonstrated this, as seen when Alien X recreated the universe after it was destroyed. This ability to reshape reality could easily explain in-universe changes like character backstories or other inconsistencies.
2. ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐: adjustments to continuityโare often explained in-universe using reality warping. For instance, when a characterโs history is altered (like Kevin's backstory), it can be seen as a change in reality rather than the manipulation of the plot structure itself. Alien Xโs powers would allow for these kinds of changes without requiring direct control over the narrative.
3. ๐ฃ๐น๐ผ๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฝ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: on the other hand, involves a character having direct control over the ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐'๐ ๐๐๐ฟ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ, not just reality. A character with plot manipulation would be able to rewrite the events, character motivations, and outcomes consciously. Celestialsapiens havenโt shown this level of control; instead, theyโve shown power over the ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ'๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐, which explains retcons as ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป, not the plot.
It doesn't say anything regarding the change of plot of and continuity of the stories which Celestialsapiens are able to manipulate๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐น considering how limiting the evidence it wont pass as plot manipulation https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Reality_Warping#:~:text=Reality Warping (sometimes called Reality,any item already considered real.
I think I've covered this twice aboveAs I said above this can be explained as Reality warping rather than plot manipulation. From what i saw from the video it is explained that when Alien X recreated the "Universe" Dan Riba suggested that the writers used Alien Xโs reality-warping abilities as a convenient in-universe explanation for retcons or inconsistencies.
Well I did I just didn't go to the type section on the page as I mentioned before "not that it matters"Bruh what? Tell me you didn't even read the RW page lol. Plot manipulation is listed as one of the types of it.
Iโm bringing up reality warping because thatโs exactly what Alien Xโs abilities represent. The Celestialsapiens are known to alter reality, not directly manipulate the plot. The changes between UAF and OV can be explained as alterations to the structure of the universe itself (reality), not as conscious rewrites of the story or plot manipulation.Why are you jumping back to reality warping when the change in continuities between UAF and OV was justified via Celestialsapiens?
This statement actually supports the idea that different continuities exist because of reality warping, not plot manipulation. When they mention the universe being recreated in Omniverse, they are referring to the shaping of reality, which would naturally lead to differences in continuity, such as Kevinโs backstory. But this is still reality warping, not direct control over the plot or narrative structure.
Yes, the continuity includes the retcons, but retcons explained through reality warping donโt automatically equate to plot manipulation. Kevinโs backstory changing can easily be explained by Alien X altering realityโchanging how the past unfolded, but not rewriting the narrative structure or plot mechanics themselves. Alien X isnโt controlling the storyโs script; heโs altering the events within the universe's reality.Continuity in this case would include whatever retcons they decided to make and I've linked all of them in the OP that includes the literal plot change in Kevin's backstory.
While itโs true that plot manipulation can be considered a subset of reality warping, the critical distinction lies in the intent and scope of the power. Plot manipulation specifically means consciously altering the narrative or events of the story, whereas reality warping affects the universeโs structure and rules, which can indirectly change the plot but isnโt the same as directly rewriting it. Just because the outcome appears similar doesnโt mean the mechanism or intent is the same.The proofs are quite literally present in the OP. Plot manipulation is a subset of reality warping so you will obviously see the similarity in the overall outcome.
This is a false dilemma or false equivalence fallacy. You are representing the situation as though changing a characterโs backstory (through reality warping) must equate to plot manipulation. However, changing the backstory through reality warping means altering the facts or events of the past, not necessarily altering the story's structure or narrative in a direct, conscious manner. In other words, the backstory change can be a result of reality manipulation, but it doesnโt automatically imply control over the plot itself.For example, let's say that a character has plot manipulation. And he decides to change the plot of the show by changing the backstory of a certain character which changes the plot of the show .
What would you say it to be? Reality Warping? Despite changing the plot of the show?
When authors implement a retcon, they are changing aspects of the continuity of the storyโsometimes rewriting character backstories, events, or details that previously existed. This doesnโt equate to plot manipulation in the context of the storyโs universe. Instead, itโs a narrative decision made by the authors, not something an in-universe character is doing but when the author blames it on the characters that are within the story there could be multiple interpretation, if an in-verse explanation is there we go by it and as we know the Celestialsapien race keep on changing Ben's universe which can be explained by the retcons and at tha we have a very solid reason why this is happening because they are warping reality.Tell me what do the authors do when they decide to retcon something? Do they warp reality or change the plot of the show? And what if the author blames some in-verse character to make such changes?
๐ฆ๐๐ผ๐ฝ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ณ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐บ๐๐๐ฒ๐น๐ณ, Iโm literally distinguishing between two different concepts. Reality warping reshapes events within the universe itself (like altering history), while plot manipulation directly changes the story's structure. Alien Xโs demonstrated abilities align with reality warping, not controlling the narrative like an author would.As explained with the prior example, you're simply confusing yourself with both the abilities.
Kevinโs backstory changing and introducing a new arc fits within the framework of reality warping. It changes past events in the universe, which then causes new events to unfold. This is typical of retcons explained by reality warpingโaltering a characterโs history changes the present reality, but it doesnโt mean Alien X or Celestialsapiens are directly manipulating the plot. Theyโre altering the universeโs history, not acting as the storyโs authors. The arc is simply a consequence of the warped reality, not evidence of plot.To repeat myself with some additions, Kevin's change in backstory changes results in an entirely new arc (rooters arc) which affects the continuity of the series and characters involved in it.
How does it not matter? This the very reason why you're getting confused.Well I did I just didn't go to the type section on the page as I mentioned before "not that it matters"
That's quite literally circular reasoning since you're coming back to your claim despite it being refuted.Iโm bringing up reality warping because thatโs exactly what Alien Xโs abilities represent. The Celestialsapiens are known to alter reality, not directly manipulate the plot. The changes between UAF and OV can be explained as alterations to the structure of the universe itself (reality), not as conscious rewrites of the story or plot manipulation.
Okay so let me summarise your point. You agree that retcons are made by Celestialsapiens which results in changing the past of the characters thereby giving new story(s). But then you claim it to be done via reality warping while forgetting that pm is a subset of rw hence it is not something to be worried about as explain in the above example. So basically this is an auto concession since you fail to understand the abilities and I'm not surprised because you initially thought that rw is a subset or pm lol.This statement actually supports the idea that different continuities exist because of reality warping, not plot manipulation. When they mention the universe being recreated in Omniverse, they are referring to the shaping of reality, which would naturally lead to differences in continuity, such as Kevinโs backstory. But this is still reality warping, not direct control over the plot or narrative structure.
Yes, the continuity includes the retcons, but retcons explained through reality warping donโt automatically equate to plot manipulation. Kevinโs backstory changing can easily be explained by Alien X altering realityโchanging how the past unfolded, but not rewriting the narrative structure or plot mechanics themselves. Alien X isnโt controlling the storyโs script; heโs altering the events within the universe's reality.
Its not "can be considered", instead it's factually established in the page. So happy realisation bud.While itโs true that plot manipulation can be considered a subset of reality warping,
So you're saying that narrative events are not the same as plot/continuity of the series? If that's the case then you're contradicting yourself.the critical distinction lies in the intent and scope of the power. Plot manipulation specifically means consciously altering the narrative or events of the story,
What? Intent?? BruhJust because the outcome appears similar doesnโt mean the mechanism or intent is the same.
I never claimed it was done via reality warpingThis is a false dilemma or false equivalence fallacy. You are representing the situation as though changing a characterโs backstory (through reality warping)
Yes the actual plot of the story and characters being changed is the reason behind itmust equate to plot manipulation.
I'm not arguing rwHowever, changing the backstory through reality warping means altering the facts or events of the past,
It did though. Which is resulted in Rooters arc so you're contradicting yourself againnot necessarily altering the story's structure
Altering the history in such a way that it arises in changing the plot of the series thereby establishing different narrative and giving new arcs.In this context, Alien Xโs reality warping could change how Kevinโs backstory unfolded, but thatโs still reality warping because itโs altering the universeโs history.
Galaxy brain meme moment.Plot manipulation, on the other hand, would require direct control over how the storyline and narrative progress consciouslyโAlien X hasnโt shown this kind of ability.
So something that results in change of plot of the story isn't plot manipulation aightWhen authors implement a retcon, they are changing aspects of the continuity of the storyโsometimes rewriting character backstories, events, or details that previously existed. This doesnโt equate to plot manipulation in the context of the storyโs universe. Instead, itโs a narrative decision
Sorry to say but you are still confusing yourself. You've claimed such bad takes that I cannot describe it.๐ฆ๐๐ผ๐ฝ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ณ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐บ๐๐๐ฒ๐น๐ณ, Iโm literally distinguishing between two different concepts. Reality warping reshapes events within the universe itself (like altering history), while plot manipulation directly changes the story's structure. Alien Xโs demonstrated abilities align with reality warping, not controlling the narrative like an author would.
So plot manipulation cannot retcon anything? Is this what your claim is?Kevinโs backstory changing and introducing new arc fits within the framework of reality warping. It changes past events in the universe, which then causes new events to unfold. This is typical of retcons explained by reality warping
Seems like a tiring matter (Try ask FaxualScaler to make his vsbw acc to assist here)And if you're gonna reply with the same thing then you can just agree to disagree currently and better wait for some staff to show up (I've asked firestorm for his input so yeah)
Nah I'm handling it currently, greenshifter will pull up soon (probably).Seems like a tiring matter (Try ask FaxualScaler to make his vsbw acc to assist here)
Your opinion doesn't matter but KDisagree FRA
@Forthegood I hope you're reading this instead of wasting time in typing long essaysAnd if you're gonna reply with the same thing then you can just agree to disagree currently and better wait for some staff to show up (I've asked firestorm for his input so yeah)
Can you at least explain why?Hard disagree
Oh, trust me, Iโm reading your pointsโthough they donโt exactly take much time to process. Iโve just been busy with something while addressing the arguments that you presented which doesnโt really "hold up", but hey, someoneโs gotta do it.@Forthegood I hope you're reading this instead of wasting time in typing long essays
Getting the same from a staff member would hold some weight to the thread.Oh, trust me, Iโm reading your pointsโthough they donโt exactly take much time to process. Iโve just been busy with something while addressing the arguments that you presented which doesnโt really "hold up", but hey, someoneโs gotta do it.
So Kevin's backstory also changed because structure of universe changed huh ?The changes between UAF and OV can be explained as alterations to the structure of the universe itself (reality), not as conscious rewrites of the story or plot manipulation.
No, because changing someones history is causality manipulation which is in universeBut aren't changing someone's history and changing structure of universe different things ?
Change of Kevinโs backstory was altering the previously established plot and continuity in UAF. Don't come up with random headcanons.No, because changing someones history is causality manipulation which is in universe
My argument is not circular reasoning, and here's whyThat's quite literally circular reasoning since you're coming back to your claim despite it being refuted.
First of all, letโs clarify what youโre missing in your summary: just because retcons occur doesn't mean they equate to plot manipulation. This isnโt an โauto concessionโ:Okay so let me summarise your point. You agree that retcons are made by Celestialsapiens which results in changing the past of the characters thereby giving new story(s). But then you claim it to be done via reality warping while forgetting that pm is a subset of rw hence it is not something to be worried about as explain in the above example. So basically this is an auto concession since you fail to understand the abilities and I'm not surprised because you initially thought that rw is a subset or pm lol.
OMG Thank you so much for that enlightening revelation! I had no idea we were working with facts hereโwhat a groundbreaking discovery! So, according to your profound understanding of the page, plot manipulation is indeed a subset of reality warping. But just because it's established doesnโt mean every instance of reality warping automatically qualifies as plot manipulation. I mean, itโs great that youโre so well-versed in the definitions, but letโs not forget that just because a category exists, it doesnโt mean every example neatly fits into it. Maybe next time, we can dive into the delightful nuances of these terms.Its not "can be considered", instead it's factually established in the page. So happy realisation bud.
Actually I am not contradicting myself at all. Youโre confusing the terms โnarrativeโ and โcontinuityโ as if theyโre completely interchangeable, which is not the case. Plot Manipulation is about consciously controlling the narrativeโthis includes directly influencing how events in a story unfold, manipulating character motivations, and determining outcomes. In other words, plot manipulation impacts the storytelling itself, not just the environment in which the story happens.So you're saying that narrative events are not the same as plot/continuity of the series? If that's the case then you're contradicting yourself.
More evidence of you misunderstanding the pointWhat? Intent?? Bruh
reread what I said there I am not saying that you are saying that this was done via Reality warping(more evidence of you not understanding)I never claimed it was done via reality warping
No its notYes the actual plot of the story and characters being changed is the reason behind it
This is not even what I said nor impliedI'm not arguing rw
Ah yes, another classic 'contradiction' that exists only in your imagination. Changing the events in-universe, like creating the Rooters arc, doesnโt magically equal plot manipulation. Itโs still reality warping, where the events of history are altered, but no one is sitting there rewriting the plot like an author with a pen. So unless Alien X is secretly a writer, this isnโt the contradiction you're looking for.It did though. Which is resulted in Rooters arc so you're contradicting yourself again
Okay? What the hell is this even?Altering the history in such a way that it arises in changing the plot of the series thereby establishing different narrative and giving new arcs.
I'll take this as your way of concedingGalaxy brain meme moment.
Oh, absolutely! Because clearly, every time an author changes a detail, we should just assume it's plot manipulation. Who needs narrative decisions when we can just call every retcon "plot manipulation," right? By that logic, anytime a new costume design shows up, that's plot manipulation too? But seriously, changing aspects of continuity is just adjusting the details of the story, not rewriting the entire script or controlling the events in the plot. Thereโs a big difference between shifting background info and actually controlling the plot.So something that results in change of plot of the story isn't plot manipulation aight
This is deflection and oh, I'm sure if I asked you to describe these 'bad takes,' you'd come up empty-handed. It's almost like you just threw that out there without anything to back it up. But hey, if saying 'youโre confusing yourself' is your go-to, I guess that says more about the argument than my so-called 'bad takes.'"Sorry to say but you are still confusing yourself. You've claimed such bad takes that I cannot describe it.
Oh, of course, plot manipulation is the ultimate tool for fixing everything. Retcons, dinner reservations, and maybe even my Wi-Fi connection, right? But seriously, just because retcons happen doesnโt mean they automatically fall under plot manipulation. Reality warping explains it just fine without giving Alien X a writerโs pen. I had my fun and honestly I am not neutral I straight up disagree so this will be my last response as I said before so yeah hopefully the admins make the right call.So plot manipulation cannot retcon anything? Is this what your claim is?
Like literally you agree with the retcons taking place but failing to understand.
Did you purposefully ignore the bracket after structure of universe ?So Kevin's backstory also changed because structure of universe changed huh ?
But aren't changing someone's history and changing structure of universe different things ?
This is literally an application of causality manip, changing history. Sorry but this is just wank that is being scretched and forced, just like most of the other things on the profile lolDon't come up with random headcanons.
Inherently not related in that manner? Which means you're again going against pm being a subset of rw which is what makes my analogy sensible.However, plot manipulation and reality warping are not inherently related in that manner.
Narrative: the description of events in a story.Just because one can result in changes that resemble the other does not mean they are the same or that one can substitute for the other.
๐๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐, ๐ฃ๐น๐ผ๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฝ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ด are defined differently within the context of storytelling. ๐ฃ๐น๐ผ๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฝ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป specifically involves changing the ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฟ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ and events of a story directly
The authors literally blame Celestialsapiens for changes in plot as a means to justify their changes in the narrative. So if talking about in-verse, Celestialsapiens are the ones who are supposed to have direct control over the show. It had already been established that they have absolute control over reality which is what the plot manipulation page demands:, while ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ด involves altering the fabric of reality without direct control over the plot.
Your reasoning is quite literally trying to merge the both the abilities instead of trying to make a logical distinction.I'm giving you a clear distinction, So far I have been making a specific distinction between reality warping and plot manipulation, asserting that Alien X's abilities represent the former. Circular reasoning usually occurs when the conclusion is included in the premise without independent support. In this case, I am providing logical reasoning to differentiate the two concepts rather than restating my original claim.
This isn't what I claimed.You're misunderstanding the abilities you're conflating the concepts of reality warping and plot manipulation. While it's true that plot manipulation is a subset of reality warping, that doesn't automatically mean every instance of reality warping must be categorized as plot manipulation.
I think you were demanding Celestialsapiens to have absolute control over reality which something that even the page demands for so yeah.Me asserting that the changes in character backstories, like Kevinโs, can be explained by Alien Xโs reality-warping abilities. Itโs not an auto concession; itโs a nuanced distinction about how powers are applied. Alien X's alterations reshape reality without giving him direct control over narrative mechanics.
Not just changing the past, but instead retroactively changing the past, by changing what is recorded about the past in the plot.Just because a character can change the past doesnโt imply theyโre rewriting the script;
It isSo no, this isnโt an auto concession.
Glad you realised itOMG Thank you so much for that enlightening revelation! I had no idea we were working with facts hereโwhat a groundbreaking discovery! So, according to your profound understanding of the page, plot manipulation is indeed a subset of reality warping.
Not what I claimed.But just because it's established doesnโt mean every instance of reality warping automatically qualifies as plot manipulation.
SureI mean, itโs great that youโre so well-versed in the definitions, but letโs not forget that just because a category exists, it doesnโt mean every example neatly fits into it. Maybe next time, we can dive into the delightful nuances of these terms.
Narrative: the description of events in a story.Actually I am not contradicting myself at all. Youโre confusing the terms โnarrativeโ and โcontinuityโ as if theyโre completely interchangeable, which is not the case.
The story telling of Kevinโs past in OV was done in such a way that there didn't exist any plothole because the previously established events were re-explained as false memories so yes it did impact the story telling. And as said earlier, Ben remembers his past self as his OV design despite being aware of Chadzmuth's statement which also implies that the story telling was indeed affected by the change.In other words, plot manipulation impacts the storytelling itself, not just the environment in which the story happens.
"For all we know Celestialsapiens are out there changing the Universe at this very moment"When I talk about intent in the context of plot manipulation, I am referring to a character or entity actively and consciously deciding to change the storyโs eventsโlike an author deciding to change what happens next in a story.
so you're inserting the claimed that Celestialsapiens aren't aware of them making the changes?This is what makes plot manipulation unique. Itโs not just about what happens but why it happens. The character must be aware that they are influencing the narrative,
Celestialsapiens don't have their "own universe". They reside in Forge of Creation which is in The Space Beyond/Omniverse.not just changing things within their own universeโs rules.
again claiming that Celestialsapiens are doing it unintentionally without any evidenceJust because the outcome (like retcons or backstory changes) is similar doesnโt mean the cause (intentional control of the plot) is the same.
This something that I'm supposed to sayreread what I said there I am not saying you're saying that this was done via Reality warping(more evidence of you not understanding)
Removing the previously established narrative to add a new one, as simple as that.Ah yes, another classic 'contradiction' that exists only in your imagination. Changing the events in-universe, like creating the Rooters arc,
If it helps you warp your mind's reality confusing between both the meaningsI'll take this as your way of conceding
repeating my point again, not just a detail but instead a previously established narrative.Oh, absolutely! Because clearly, every time an author changes a detail, we should just assume it's plot manipulation.
Sure I could but not in this thread for the sake of avoiding derailmentThis is deflection and oh, I'm sure if I asked you to describe these 'bad takes,' you'd come up empty-handed. It's almost like you just threw that out there without anything to back it up. But hey, if saying 'youโre confusing yourself' is your go-to, I guess that says more about the argument than my so-called 'bad takes.'"
Straight up headcanon as I've already written down that in which possible uses the ability of Celestialsapiens fit inOh, of course, plot manipulation is the ultimate tool for fixing everything. Retcons, dinner reservations, and maybe even my Wi-Fi connection, right?
Kso this will be my last response as I said before so yeah hopefully the admins make the right call.
Ah yeah this is causality manipulationThis is literally an application of causality manip, changing history. Sorry but this is just wank that is being scretched and forced, just like most of the other things on the profile lol
Never claimed this, I've specifically used a sentence from plot manipulation page itselfI guess teleporting is also plot manipulation since it changes the characters location in the plot?
Voice and look changing is not the only thing being argued, instead the very establied narrative of the osmosians was changed in the Omniverse series.Yeah none of this remotely sounds like plot manipulation, the voice changing or the look changing barely has anything to do with metafictional or metanarrative things being altered. Disagree
Aggregor was described as an osmosian (same as the species of Kevin) in UAF series. Him being an osmosian was also mentioned in a guidebook. But this idea was later retconned in the Omniverse series, dropping the previously established narrative.Whereโs it stated their established narratives are being changed?
The writers blame Celestialsapiens as their justification for suchYeah the writers retconned it, not Alien X
HereWriters aren't literally saying Celestiasapiens changed the very fabric of the plot and the story itself,
they are saying they used the celestialsapiens ability to warp reality to cleverly justify why there are changes to the character voices and etc.
Like reality warping on a meta level is essentially plot manipulation so
I'll convince himYou should put @Theglassman12 on disagree since he is staff and unlike us his vote matters
they are saying they used the celestialsapiens ability to warp reality to cleverly justify why there are changes
My point still stands"we did justify it a little bit"
Like reality warping on a meta level is essentially plot manipulation so
And that ability is plot manipulation which is something that the writers do i.e. changing of plot. Since they use Celestialsapiens as a justification for the same changes, why would you assume that the ability would change? That's fallaciousthey are fricking saying they used their abilities to justify the changes.
It's straightforward enough if you take out your biasJustify here means they are using them as EXCUSES, they are not "blaming them" which is you trying to scretch and make the evidence seem better than it is which is like just a pretty petty move
Because they are specifically using one of Alien Xs Reality Warping feats to justify it (the universe being recreated)And that ability is plot manipulation which is something that the writers do i.e. changing of plot. Since they use Celestialsapiens as a justification for the same changes, why would you assume that the ability would change?