- 20,541
- 17,454
The storm calcs are legitimately High 6-B, its just that there wasn't any evidence that Thor scales to the full power of the storms.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should he not still get that listed on his profile though?The storm calcs are legitimately High 6-B, its just that there wasn't any evidence that Thor scales to the full power of the storms.
Yeah they would be listed still. Its just that scaling it to his base AP is questionable at the moment.Should he not still get that listed on his profile though?
Okay good and that's fair also are we still upscaling the characters to 6-CYeah they would be listed still. Its just that scaling it to his base AP is questionable at the moment.
ProbablyOkay good and that's fair also are we still upscaling the characters to 6-C
Would Thor look like this for example 6-C(blah blah)and high 6-B with storms(calc's linked or whatever)
Alright cool I'm down with thatProbably
Low 2-C Thanos is cinemaHere's my view on timeline scaling
So as an example
- The Infinity Stones cross scaling is fine imo, since they're one of the big timeline split reasons and are treated as the same across any universe barring minor differences
- I agree with Main TL -> Alt TL scaling, but not for the reverse
- I think using Infinity Ultron to justify a 3-A to Low 2-C Main TL IG's is understandable
Agreed; not sure if that means we can scale Marvel to her canon counterpart or if we should just stick to the objective feats (the latter, imo, is better)
- I'm against stuff like scaling Vision to 6-C or scaling Main TL CM to What If CM's showings like the core smash
Also High 6-B were outliers iircThe High 6-B calcs were rejected due to canon numbers or conflicting information
Vision wouldn't be scaled to 6-C anyways and tbh What If captain marvel has some pretty good feats some better and some right in the range of her main counterpart but all worth keeping in in terms of MCU calc'sAgreed; not sure if that means we can scale Marvel to her canon counterpart or if we should just stick to the objective feats (the latter, imo, is better)
I think its his storm that covered WakandaAlso what are the High 6-B storms?
WhatI think its his storm that covered Wakanda
I was thinking of the older methods. They were all like 7-B to 6-CWasn't that Low 7-B to 7-B
Ultron will be 4d though so ehI'd also note Supreme Leader Ultron claims he can "destroy galaxies with a thought" which should indicate up to Galactic powers
Based off the universe shattering punches right?Low 2-C. It's in the sandbox
That, and him scaling above the Watcher being able to fix the timelineBased off the universe shattering punches right?
Yeah via making universes into messy soup via physical attacks consistent with watcher being able to fix timeline collapsingWait will he?
I think the Retcons could just be Space Time Manipulation but Watcher is decentThat, and him scaling above the Watcher being able to fix the timeline
I mean would scale to physical strength as he just punches so his physical ap should scaleI think the Retcons could just be Space Time Manipulation but Watcher is decent
Only if it destroys; if it just shifts time it would be unquantifiableI mean would scale to physical strength as he just punches so his physical ap should scale
WoG states that he turned them into one messy soupOnly if it destroys; if it just shifts time it would be unquantifiable
Ultron vibranium armour is you knowCan Captain Marvel's feat of cracking Ultron's armour be added as a supporting feat? Pretty sure that's 6-C coz vibranium body.
Ultron is Low 2-CCan Captain Marvel's feat of cracking Ultron's armour be added as a supporting feat? Pretty sure that's 6-C coz vibranium body.
Only when tapping into the stones.Ultron is Low 2-C
Yeah. 8ts just that he can freely tap into the stones unlike other users.So he is 6-C still unassisted