Zeinx1
He/Him- 1,007
- 421
yo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yo
If you have evidence, throw it here, if there is no evidence, the l1c needs to be loweredI don't think you need to open a CRT for this. If you wanted something like this, I could have sent it to you via Discord in the past weeks.
I think I will agree with the low 1c issue on this issue. In fact, vsb strongly supports this. They explained it above. Seeing a cosmology from low 2-c to 2-a as fiction, this definitely gives low 1c. But for now, I will watch this issue from afar.2a kozmolojiyi kurgu olarak ve hayal gücünün bir parçası olarak görüyoruz zaten düşük1c veriyor
If you read what I wrote carefully, I think I could have sent it last week, but it will take me a long time to find that evidenceIf you have evidence that you can send via Discord, then you can prove what you say here.
The authorities have not accepted it anyway 3 officials stated thisIf you have evidence, throw it here, if there is no evidence, the l1c needs to be lowered
I think I will agree with the low 1c issue on this issue. In fact, vsb strongly supports this. They explained it above. Seeing a cosmology from low 2-c to 2-a as fiction, this definitely gives low 1c. But for now, I will watch this issue from afar.
I am a late comer to the thread, but are you really arguing without evidence? If you have no evidence, there is no point in arguing. It's a ridiculous thing to do.If you read what I wrote carefully, I think I could have sent it last week, but it will take me a long time to find that evidence
I'm talking about the Discord issue. If you haven't read everything I wrote, there is no point in responding to me. All 3 officials rejected this CRT.I am a late comer to the thread, but are you really arguing without evidence? If you have no evidence, there is no point in arguing. It's a ridiculous thing to do.
Please look for your evidence and do not come up with excuses like "I had evidence last week".
But I don't think Damage will close this OP without proof.I'm talking about the Discord issue. If you haven't read everything I wrote, there is no point in responding to me. All 3 officials rejected this CRT.
I think so tooBut I don't think Damage will close this OP without proof.
I think I will agree with the low 1c issue on this issue. In fact, vsb strongly supports this. They explained it above. Seeing a cosmology from low 2-c to 2-a as fiction, this definitely gives low 1c. But for now, I will watch this issue from afar.
What does Damage mean and who is he? The evidence was already mentioned because it is in its "true form", but if you still want the evidence, I think you should wait for someone authorized, I'm lazy right now.But I don't think Damage will close this OP without proof.
ok.I'm talking about the Discord issue. If you haven't read everything I wrote, there is no point in responding to me. All 3 officials rejected this CRT.
.What they said is ridiculous and mashmyre has nothing to do with it. The incident here and Mashmyre's incident are completely distorted. The same thing that is being explained here is in the scp swan creatures and the writer themselves. What is meant here is that the authors appearing in the manga do not exist in real life. So, if a person writes the manga within a manga, he becomes a fictional character, not a real person. But mashmyre l1c is because he writes a universe that already has a 2a cosmology and sees it as fiction in the same way.
I think Damage is a moderator and someone with a higher rank than you who has not been able to scan the issue he defends.What does Damage mean and who is he? The evidence was already mentioned because it is in its "true form", but if you still want the evidence, I think you should wait for someone authorized, I'm lazy right now.
Are you kidding?What does Damage mean and who is he?
Yes, what everyone is waiting for at this point is for you to provide evidence in addition to what you say..
I already answered this Valeska
Mento has given a sufficient answer to this issue and now send me this scan..
I already answered this Valeska
I think Damage is a moderator and someone with a higher rank than you who has not been able to scan the issue he defends.
If he is a person, I just said I don't know himAre you kidding?
An admin on the wiki (almost one of the most well-known admins)If he is a person, I just said I don't know him
Yes, what everyone is waiting for at this point is for you to provide evidence in addition to what you say.
I said I wanted to send this to you because I was too lazy to find the scales I had. The most logical decision would be to wait for someone authorized to arrive.Mento has given a sufficient answer to this issue and now send me this scan.
I understood thank youAn admin on the wiki (almost one of the most well-known admins)
Ffs, just wait for Mitch to respond. Why the hell is this 5 pages long?
No one can perform additional scans right now. Would you like to reconsider your side of the argument by re-reading?Ffs, just wait for Mitch to respond. Why the hell is this 5 pages long?
Seconding this.Ffs, just wait for Mitch to respond. Why the hell is this 5 pages long?
we are currently waiting for Mashima Cosmology officials.Seconding this.
This has been a ridiculous amount of discussion over this without evidence being put forward yet.
We want sace evidence but no one is throwing it away so we will have to wait longer.Seconding this.
This has been a ridiculous amount of discussion over this without evidence being put forward yet.
This thread has gotten really long. Shall we move to a new thread and discuss the issue in a more understandable way?Seconding this.
This has been a ridiculous amount of discussion over this without evidence being put forward yet.
Yes, that makes more sense.This thread has gotten really long. Shall we move to a new thread and discuss the issue in a more understandable way?
Way too early for a new thread. Just let the opposition post their scans when they have a chance.This thread has gotten really long. Shall we move to a new thread and discuss the issue in a more understandable way?
I think it is more consistent for most people to open a new topic than to waste their time with 5 empty pages.Way too early for a new thread. Just let the opposition post their scans when they have a chance.
For 5 pages there was only empty fighting. all that is needed is to send the necessary scans. when the necessary scans are sent this crt will close, if the necessary scans are not sent maybe a new one can be opened.I think it is more consistent for most people to open a new topic than to waste their time with 5 empty pages.
It's still your decision .
The person assuring us about providing the scans mentioned that it will take "a little bit of time," and I'm confident that knowledgeable members in the FT wouldn't prefer to read through 5 pages of people arguing with each other for trivial matters. Instead, I believe reaching a quicker agreement could be achieved through a new thread that consolidates everything with "fewer" messages.For 5 pages there was only empty fighting. all that is needed is to send the necessary scans. when the necessary scans are sent this crt will close, if the necessary scans are not sent maybe a new one can be opened.
It can't be applied until 48 hours pass from the thread's creation anyway, so they have time.Do we really need to wait any longer, the evidence we asked for has not been provided, the debate is dragging on in vain, where are these supporters?