- ">Hasn't even read the Peter Parker comic"
You mean the issue of
Peter Parker: Spider-Ma that references events from this arc?
- "> high 1-B without explaining anything"
"I'll explain why in a proper thread, so that I don't crowd this one/have to repost everything." - Me, several posts ago
- "The fact is Kadmon was before and is more important than any abstract."
K'ad-Mon was not before any abstract.
He was born from the first woman after creation. There are abstracts who literally are creation itself.
If you're saying he's more important than any abstract because he maintains the dream of creation, then that is true
within this story/particular view of the cosmology. However, it is a view that is not referenced outside of DeMatteis' writing, and the story itself does not really involve or directly bring up any of the other abstracts. You are acting like "nothing can exist without the Man of Lineage" is something that is a constant in Marvel's cosmology, whereas I don't think it's ever brought up outside of these issues. This is an important distinction to make.
- "the existence of kadmon is even far more important than TLT without him all of creation wouldn't even exist at all."
I don't believe TLT is ever even mentioned during these events, nor are the beings of Eternity, Infinity, etc. (If they are, and I am forgetting, then please show me the pages.) The the story is more self-contained, and thus the two are never compared. Also, being "more important than TLT" and maintaining creation isn't a 1-A feat.
- "Funny thing is kadmon has more 1-A feats than beyonder does."
More than "zero direct feats and some vague scaling" isn't a high bar. If he has so many 1-A feats, you could always just show the pages, because there is currently one High 1-B feat linked on his page followed by Ted believing that
perhaps he is a threat to the Creator, which is something else I can explain my issues with.
- "Can you even explain 1-A is too high?"
"I'll explain why in a proper thread, so that I don't crowd this one/have to repost everything." - Still me, still several posts ago
- "inb4 the divine creator is 11-C"
Wow, it's almost as if snide comments about things I didn't say instead of just posting evidence to go along with your points is entirely useless for the conversation at hand!
- "You can remove the profile. i rather want them to be deleted than heavily downplayed."
You made profiles about obscure and vague characters that few people have ever heard of and rated them extremely high. I read the exact same story you did and disagree with some of the rankings you've provided, while still agreeing they could be rated very highly. Before I even create a thread posting why I think this, you cry "omg downplay!! might as well just remove the profiles".
In what universe is this helpful? How can we actually discuss the stats of these characters if you don't want to have an actual discussion? Did you by any chance notice that upon disagreeing with some of these stats, I stated that I would make a thread about it and post my evidence as opposed to just downgrading them without any input? That's because if something I think is incorrect can be shown to be perfectly fine with actual evidence from the comics, I want to
know that. I never said "my opinion is right because I said so". I said "these pages need serious work" and offered to provide why I think so, which would allow people the opportunity to actually have a debate.