Lou_change
He/Him- 10,153
- 5,393
If a law would kill him or stop the fate hax it would defend against it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like i said the profile doesn't state that it's offensive fate hax that maniplates people into doing stuff to protect mario it's just defensive fate hax that protecting mario from incap and death if they're permanentIf a law would kill him or stop the fate hax it would defend against it.
you dont have any argument other that fate dont you they been saying that fate isnt just a magic force that nullifies everyting kirito has and even if it was prob manip kinda nullifies fateIf a law would kill him or stop the fate hax it would defend against it.
^ NGL. This is kinda true.you dont have any argument other that fate dont you they been saying that fate isnt just a magic force that nullifies everyting kirito has and even if it was prob manip kinda nullifies fate
Kinda too late for thatAlso, if this is a stomp in either's favor, I'll change it to Snatcher
Not really. If there is a debate still going on even with grace, it's not game over.Wel... Now that Mario hit Grace we can't do much really
Oh well such is life
I feel like this is hitting two certain fallacies that I know of. Maybe another.you dont have any argument other that fate dont you they been saying that fate isnt just a magic force that nullifies everyting kirito has and even if it was prob manip kinda nullifies fate
^ LMAOI feel like this is hitting two certain fallacies that I know of. Maybe another.
Yea. Kirito would destroy Mario's soul as his first move since Ice Manipulation won't work here and then Power Null which inclines with Law Manipulation.I don't see that it is a stomp, technically kirito can win with the manipulation of laws and other of his abilities, only that as far as I see it is not something that he would use in his first moves, while mario has a variety of movement that will allow him to win the fight, as it was said before.
Like i said he kirito has passive reality alteration and probability manip that makes him more likely to winI don't see that it is a stomp, technically kirito can win with the manipulation of laws and other of his abilities, only that as far as I see it is not something that he would use in his first moves, while mario has a variety of movement that will allow him to win the fight, as it was said before.
so.. where are the fallacies that i ’’used’’I feel like this is hitting two certain fallacies that I know of. Maybe another.
No, I wasn't referring to you.so.. where are the fallacies that i ’’used’’
^ I have to agree with this. This is basically stone walling if this can't be debunked.Anyways i'll vote for kirito due to his passive reality warping and probability manip that makes his chances of winning way more likely due to law manipulation
And no one countered anything regarding Kirito's passives
The reasoning behind mario inconing kirito is Because it's basically a coin toss but that's not entirely true due to Kirito's passive reality alteration and probability manip making his chances way better than mario's
Then argueI can argue the same thing.
You took those words right out of my mouth.Then argue
Before this becomes and incon, I summoned some of the Mario supporters (still in progress) to see if that turns things around.
My argument that yes he will use the passive probability manip and reality alteration and information analysis and law hax since that will be the only thing that will be way more likely due to his passives essentially guaranteeing his win also the bowser example is not on the profile so it's irrelevantStuff
I was very clear with what i said It's not my problemI need you to be a little more coherent.
It's literally written on his profileYou said something isn't on the profile so it doesn't matter correct what about things on the profile?