-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Magical Girl Raising Project Upgrade
- Thread starter A6colute
- Start date
- 32,327
- 20,219
Chill out, my dude. You're only making this worse for yourself.
- 10,393
- 3,344
This is not a one to one discussion and never has been.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Let's look at the quote.
"Only the handle part of the blade remained. It had been cleanly cut, losing the bladed part. It couldn't be melted with heat, nor could it be shattered by shock"
Except that's how laser cutting works. A laser is directed at a material and it melts and evaporates it at the speed of light. If the sword can't be melted away, the beam is not a laser and thus doesn't travel that fast.
"Only the handle part of the blade remained. It had been cleanly cut, losing the bladed part. It couldn't be melted with heat, nor could it be shattered by shock"
Except that's how laser cutting works. A laser is directed at a material and it melts and evaporates it at the speed of light. If the sword can't be melted away, the beam is not a laser and thus doesn't travel that fast.
- 10,393
- 3,344
What reason does he have to discuss this with you somewhere other than here?
- 33,405
- 8,416
This is heated for no reason...
- 1,677
- 114
- Thread starter
- #51
Except that's how laser cutting works. A laser is directed at a material and it melts and evaporates it at the speed of light. If the sword can't be melted by heat, the beam is not a laser and thus doesn't travel at the speed of light.
And then:
The beam continued to shoot. The place Inferno was standing before had sand smoking in its place.
So, sand on the way of this beam of light is vaporizing.
And about sword - there said, that it cannot melts. Nothing about it cannot vaporises.
And then:
The beam continued to shoot. The place Inferno was standing before had sand smoking in its place.
So, sand on the way of this beam of light is vaporizing.
And about sword - there said, that it cannot melts. Nothing about it cannot vaporises.
- 1,143
- 132
Yeah this thread is getting rather out of hand here.
- 33,405
- 8,416
i.e ruining the point of a Content Revision thread. We don't do this for any other content revision, we aren't gonna do so here. I suggest you calm down.A6colute said:
- 15,332
- 7,559
Smoke signifies it is being burnt, not vaporized.
- 1,239
- 82
There is a source from the Quotes? like a capture for the Novel/PDF to believe if it is true or some lie/Fake/edit at convenience?
Also, the context for the scene (past, in the scene and future)?
Also, the context for the scene (past, in the scene and future)?
- 10,393
- 3,344
You're really not helping yourself here, dude.A6colute said:
- 11,444
- 1,997
@A6colute
The Kamehameha is a "beam of light". Are we going to call it lightspeed?
What about Excalibur? It shoots a "beam of light". It also dislocates space and generates a massive explosion at the point of impact. But are we going to call it light? No.
The Kamehameha is a "beam of light". Are we going to call it lightspeed?
What about Excalibur? It shoots a "beam of light". It also dislocates space and generates a massive explosion at the point of impact. But are we going to call it light? No.
- 33,405
- 8,416
Then why did you make a public thread. I'm not understanding here.A6colute said:
- 1,677
- 114
- Thread starter
- #63
There is a source from the Quotes? like a capture for the Novel/PDF to believe if it is true or some lie/Fake/edit at convenience?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ro6JdBkPbaYPTmryHk03HSJyb-nBkGQ1w2hRWEScfqA/edit
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ro6JdBkPbaYPTmryHk03HSJyb-nBkGQ1w2hRWEScfqA/edit
- 1,143
- 132
this thread is getting very heated for almost no reason what so ever
- 10,393
- 3,344
Dude, stop. You're not helping yourself by abusing ad hominem.
- 1,677
- 114
- Thread starter
- #67
The Kamehameha is a "beam of light".
By author's text?
What about Excalibur? It shoots a "beam of light". It also dislocates space and generates a massive explosion at the point of impact. But are we going to call it light? No.
Because "It also dislocates space and generates a massive explosion".
By author's text?
What about Excalibur? It shoots a "beam of light". It also dislocates space and generates a massive explosion at the point of impact. But are we going to call it light? No.
Because "It also dislocates space and generates a massive explosion".
- 33,405
- 8,416
>Makes a public thread
>Wants to "discuss this with someone outside this bunch of discord friends."
>Proceeded to make a public thread where these "Discord friends" will see it.
>"Discord Friends"
I'm sorry but your reasoning and logic is flawed. And what exactly does this have to do with the argument at hand? Nothing. Them being "Discord friends" does not effect the arguments at hands. Stop bringing it up as if it does.
>Wants to "discuss this with someone outside this bunch of discord friends."
>Proceeded to make a public thread where these "Discord friends" will see it.
>"Discord Friends"
I'm sorry but your reasoning and logic is flawed. And what exactly does this have to do with the argument at hand? Nothing. Them being "Discord friends" does not effect the arguments at hands. Stop bringing it up as if it does.
- 6,470
- 1,788
>Because "It also dislocates space and generates a massive explosion".
That doesn't disapprove it being "lightspeed". That's just hax . We don't call it light for many reasons than what you stated.
Dunno why you are being hostile just because someone disagree with what you think
That doesn't disapprove it being "lightspeed". That's just hax . We don't call it light for many reasons than what you stated.
Dunno why you are being hostile just because someone disagree with what you think
- 1,239
- 82
..., can stop the "flame wras/hostility" and focus on the content revision? there is a source to find the feat and by this, analize if this is a real one or hyperbole/outlier one...
- 15,332
- 7,559
Okay, so I read the chapter.
The very next passage talks about the beam killing her on contact. It also talks about the beam blasting the sand and leaving a lot of smoke and dust, basically a cloud of sand.
Real lasers don't do any of that.
The very next passage talks about the beam killing her on contact. It also talks about the beam blasting the sand and leaving a lot of smoke and dust, basically a cloud of sand.
Real lasers don't do any of that.
- 1,677
- 114
- Thread starter
- #76
Also i'm more inclined to agree with Matthew and the others on said feat being an outlier
>it's an outlier because there are no examples of evading light speed attacks
>here an example of avading a light attack
>it's not a light, it's an outlier also, etc.
You call this discussion?
>it's an outlier because there are no examples of evading light speed attacks
>here an example of avading a light attack
>it's not a light, it's an outlier also, etc.
You call this discussion?
- 15,332
- 7,559
Also, a real laser would never blast a sword away through the air. It would carve through the metal as it went along.
- 15,332
- 7,559
>it's an outlier because there are no examples of evading light speed attacks
>here an example of avading a light attack
Except she didn't even evade the light to begin with.
"She held her crescent blade straight in front of her, putting herself in a form that'll fall on her back. There was a beam of light, and the bladed part of her sword flew through the air."
She raised the blade before the beam came out. And that's while we neglect the fact it isn't real light.
>here an example of avading a light attack
Except she didn't even evade the light to begin with.
"She held her crescent blade straight in front of her, putting herself in a form that'll fall on her back. There was a beam of light, and the bladed part of her sword flew through the air."
She raised the blade before the beam came out. And that's while we neglect the fact it isn't real light.
- 1,677
- 114
- Thread starter
- #80
The very next passage talks about the beam killing her on contact.
Obviously. Because a laser is a concentrated energy. Literally. And concentrated energy can kill you.
Real lasers don't do any of that.
We talking not about real life lasers (which cannot be applicated in direct combat), but about science fiction lasers.
Obviously. Because a laser is a concentrated energy. Literally. And concentrated energy can kill you.
Real lasers don't do any of that.
We talking not about real life lasers (which cannot be applicated in direct combat), but about science fiction lasers.
Similar threads
