Madara meteors + Perfect Susanoo

[Golden_Void]

I'll bite even further and re-scale the same giant image you did, with zoomed in proof that it lines up.

Here's the full scale

Here's the proof

 

[Kepekley23]

> Consistency

> One is almost a ball, the other is a prolate spheroid

Come on son.

 

[Rocker1189]

I dont get it, that is pretty much the same scale. I feel like I may be lost.

 

[Golden_Void]

Willful ignorance at this point.

 

[Rocker1189]

??? Okay then, I guess all 3 of us are being willfully ignorant. Your picture looke nearly the exact same as his.

 

[RavenSupreme]

While I believe using Anime as an argument to prove a manga calculation is a wrong step, there is truth to Unite My Rices words. The usage of the inflated elipsoid scaling does not feel appropriate. Factoring in the stuff he brought as arguments I am inclined to believe his assessment of the feat is more suited to determine a calc.

 

[Golden_Void]

Me rn: https://youtu.be/REftJPcWKKo?t=13s

 

[Kepekley23]

You do realize you have just debunked yourself?

 

[Golden_Void]

Since even more ungodly amounts of proof and lack of sleep is required, I will trace your friend's "superior" version exactly.

As you can see here, it is completely traced

As you can see here, it still fails miserably at accomplishing a single task

None of anything you posted is correct.

 

[Dzhindzholia]

Ohhhh Supa hot fire

 

[Rocker1189]

Right so your point is that the one you did with the full scale:

Here's the full scale

Is the better one?

 

[Golden_Void]

@Rocker

Every shape I traced looks like near-spitting images of each other. The manga shows it, the anime shows it, the tracing shows it.

 

[Rocker1189]

Can you just answer my question? Are you saying the ellipsoid you drew for the circle is the better one?

 

[Golden_Void]

Yup.

 

[Kepekley23]

@Rocker

Give me 2 minutes. You'll lol

 

[Rocker1189]

Yup.

I mean I dont mind either way they are essentially the same size just shaped a bit differently.

 

[Golden_Void]

At the end of the day, the scan that shows both meteors in the same image and intact is the superior manga scan. Using the scans of damaged meteors as evidence while ignoring the perfectly good scans of the untouched meteors makes no sense.

 

[Rocker1189]

At the end of the day, the scan that shows both meteors in the same image and intact is the superior manga scan. Using the scans of damaged meteors as evidence while ignoring the perfectly good scans of the untouched meteors makes no sense.

They were not really ignored though, really to mean they looked nearly exactly the same when you were trying to say his was wrong until you posted both of them in screen shot and I looked at then side by side. But even then all the images look very similar. Apart from one in the anime which is the anime and not the canon one over the manga.

 

[Dzhindzholia]

Bruh,they are damaged but they have completely different form,something like that can not happen the way it happened in the manga.

 

[Golden_Void]

These are all that need to be shown for Madara's calculation.

 

[Kepekley23]

• Onoki = 6px = 1.3m

• Rock height = 334px = 72.3666666667m

• Rock height = 2px = 72.3666666667m

• Tengai Shinsei = 442px = 15993.0333333m

Previous height was 14800m

 

[Rocker1189]

The reason you can not use those is because of the angle they are shown at as I showed with my illustration it would make them much smaller than they are.

 

[Rocker1189]

@Kep yeah that is what I thought lol

 

[Golden_Void]

That moment when its so blurry and tiny you can't see anything. It looks like you used the sound effects kanji for scaling.

I'm happy to hear you get offended over people being thorough and your defensiveness made you think I was being confrontational lol

 

[Golden_Void]

The reason you can not use those is because of the angle they are shown at as I showed with my illustration it would make them much smaller than they are.

It wouldn't, the same rock pillars are visible in the same single meteor scan, which mean it can still be scaled.

 

[Rocker1189]

Anyway UMR I hope you can understand why we can not use those.

 

[Rocker1189]

We also dont have something to scale them off of.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

Guys...chill out...

 

[Rocker1189]

Guys...chill out...

Agreed.

 

[Arigarmy]

That doesn't make it final. Rice and Kep will be arguing until theres even more backup and then more arguing and then either the threads closed or someone wins.

 

[Rocker1189]

That doesn't make it final. Rice and Kep will be arguing until theres even more backup and then more arguing and then either the threads closed or someone wins.

I wish lol.

 

[Golden_Void]

Also @Kep, of course it would be relatively the same, the same poor version of the visible fraction of the meteor is still being used. Use any of the whole meteorites such as the ones Gwyn used and the result changes. Simple. This is why Gwyn has a substantially smaller and more reasonable result.

 

[Rocker1189]

It wouldn't, the same rock pillars are visible in the same single meteor scan, which mean it can still be scaled.

My point is the angle makes then smaller. Because of the factthat we are viewing them from the ground not the air.

The rock formations would be closer making then bigger too.

 

[Golden_Void]

We also dont have something to scale them off of.

We absolutely do.

Tell me the difference.

http://prntscr.com/js4621

http://prntscr.com/js46fe

There's a reason we angsize planets from deep in space and not 2 miles above their atmosphere looking down.

 

[Kepekley23]

You do realize that the pillars that are actually below the meteor are less than 2px in height? Barely more than 1, considering I managed to fit two pillars in 2px

Assuming 1.5, the meteor on that picture where it is coming out of the clouds is easily portrayed in the 15-16km range, since I get 320px for its height

You have upgraded the verse

@Dragon

I agree.

 

[Rocker1189]

Honestly I dont see what makes Kep calc wrong. Both ways seem kinda okay but my issue is the angle view of the style use propose.

 

[Kepekley23]

Even the picture where we can see the meteor coming down yields higher results than my original calc

 

[Golden_Void]

You do realize that the pillars that are actually below the meteor are less than 2px in height? Barely more than 1, considering I managed to fit two pillars in 2px
Assuming 1.5, the meteor on that picture where it is coming out of the clouds is easily portrayed in the 15-16km range, since I get 320px for its height

You do realize that logically, that makes no sense since the lone meteor shot that Gwyn uses comes before Onoki flies up to lighten it, regardless of the pillar sizes?

Unless you're suggesting the meteor reversed itself to give him more screen time.

 

[Rocker1189]

Tbh even if it was a down grade nothing would have been downgraded since that was a Madara exclusive move that only scales to itself. Not even to him.

 

[Kepekley23]

Between 1 and 2px = ~75m

322 = 16km

Even if I reduce my line's height to 300, I still get 14km ish for the height