- 2,462
- 1,191
How low can you go in size when it comes to independent space-time for it to still qualify for low 2-C?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Low 2-C
- Thread starter Muchacho_mrm
- Start date
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,236
- 12,284
Our current system is......................confusing so........................................universe-sized for now
TheGreatJedi13
Username Only- 5,014
- 3,189
universe-sized to be safe.
unless you're Fate where the surface of the earth is low 2-C
I still have yet to grasp and understand this reasoning cause I didn't have time to read blogpost about Fate.
Extraordinary claim, Extraordinary requirement
I still have yet to grasp and understand this reasoning cause I didn't have time to read blogpost about Fate.
Extraordinary claim, Extraordinary requirement
- 2,462
- 1,191
- Thread starter
- #4
A standard size should be set then.
- 32,781
- 37,960
There is already a standard size set bruh
93 billion light year diameter, same size as our universe.
- 2,462
- 1,191
- Thread starter
- #6
Where can I find 93 billions lightyears on the wiki?
- 4,822
- 2,455
Universe
The Universe is all of space and time and their contents, including planets, stars, galaxies, all forms of matter and energy. Due to the unknown spatial size of the universe, we use the size of the observable universe as a baseline for universal feats. The observable universe is currently...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 4,471
- 3,017
Still really dumb.
My Universe is 92 Billion Light Years and suddenly it's now Low 2-C anymore.
- 32,781
- 37,960
Isn't that a tad bit too overspecific? We don't assume universes to be smaller than ours unless explicitly stated or confirmed to be so.
- 32,781
- 37,960
Again, we don't assume universes to be smaller than ours unless explicitly stated in-verse.
- 4,471
- 3,017
Ok in the novel I'm reading atm (legit), this parallel universe is specifically stated to be fifty billion light years in diameter in comparison to our own universe.
What makes that 40+ Billion Light Years of almost entirely empty space so important that the parallel universe does not qualify as Low 2-C?
- 32,781
- 37,960
- 10,502
- 11,571
What does "almost empty space" mean? That space is exactly as filled with stuff as every other part of the universe.
Anyway, we gotta set the border somewhere and observable universe size is, in all likelihood, a massive lowball already.
Anyway, we gotta set the border somewhere and observable universe size is, in all likelihood, a massive lowball already.
- 32,781
- 37,960
So uh, how many light years of diameter do you think is a good border for Low 2-C to begin at?
- 10,502
- 11,571
Like space-wise? Usual Low-End Universe size i.e. diameter of the observable universe.
93 billion lightyears in diameter.
93 billion lightyears in diameter.
- 32,781
- 37,960
So what happens to stuff like 50 billion light-year diameter universes? Or even 92 billion light year diameter universes? Just curious.
- 10,502
- 11,571
Presumably would be counted as pocket dimensions and ranked accordingly.
Similar threads
