- 16,120
- 12,618
I think the logical conclusion of defeating someone who's superior to you in sheer power without amps, when he has amps, is that those amps aren't very high.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Either Mario is weaker than Base Bowser (Which he is, Bowser is always portrayed as physically superior and there are several games where it's a game mechanic that Mario can't defeat Bowser normally), or Mario is somehow magically stronger than Bowser.Bowser is typically equal to or stronger than Mario in just his base form so saying Mario is stronger than a Grand Star-amped Bowser is sus, though Mario defeats other enemies powered by Grand Stars.
Either Mario is weaker than Base Bowser (Which he is, Bowser is always portrayed as physically superior and there are several games where it's a game mechanic that Mario can't defeat Bowser normally), or Mario is somehow magically stronger than Bowser.
The answer is that Mario isn't stronger than Amped Bowser because in Mario Galaxy you defeat Bowser by having Bowser burn his ass on the reactor so Bowser is stunned and then hitting him. It's a game mechanic that Bowser is invincible if not stunned first.
The Amp in Galaxy is demonstrably not very high since Bowser burns himself on the Star Reactor when he touches it.I think the logical conclusion of defeating someone who's superior to you in sheer power without amps, when he has amps, is that those amps aren't very high.
It happens in the final boss fight too.Bowser isn't amped in MG1, that's his base form.
Provide evidence that Black Jewel creating a universe scales to AP and durability.Wario fighting Black Jewel (3-A to Low 2-C)
Rosalina casually shields Mario and friends from an explosion that would be lethal to them. They don't scale to her. Also accounting for size the feat isn't going to be Low 2-C on Rosalina assuming she isn't shielding it herself either.Rosalina ranking universal resets (Low 2-C)
This is not Low 2-C as I explained, because they weren't in the epicenter of the explosion and were thrown elsewhere when the dimension collapsed. Again, account for size, this isn't going to scale to the full universe-stretching blast.Paper Mario, Peach, and Bowser surviving Sammer’s Kingdom collapse (Low 2-C)
Show me tier 2 feats ever having to do with surface area once and before you’re bringing it up now and it being accepted and I’ll close this thread right here, right now.
It shouldn't.Does a Low 2-C explosion still account for surface area?
Fantastic Four bit feats, finale (for now)
From my (now completed) Fantastic Four thread. volume 4 #6. Blastaar survives for a bit inside the Big Bang: http://i.imgur.com/Xynibhn.jpg http://i.imgur.com/zzUmGP8.jpg http://i.imgur.com/pw0J016.jpg http://i.imgur.com/VFKpYn3.jpg...www.narutoforums.org
This feat. Blaastar surviving inside the Big Bang.
The feat itself:
As you can see this was calced at 38.62213193 exatons/second which is Moon level, and has been used as supporting evidence for The Thing (Who beats up Blaastar in the same arc) for 4 whole years.
You can close the thread now.
All explosions must account for the area that hits you. An explosion that destroys space-time is not going to hit you with all its power. In fact, it's capability to destroy space and time is entirely irrelevant to the portion of the blast that will still hit you.Does a Low 2-C explosion still account for surface area?
Every other verse is wrong“You’ll get that one Marvel dude that would be uni literally on any other verse, and that’s it.”
Surely it’s not our rampant scrutinization on every marvel feat above planet. Surely.Every other verse is wrong
Every verse should be scrutinized to the same degree as we scrutinize Marvel and we are by far one of the most leniant websites on the entire internet when it comes to Marvel anyway.Surely it’s not our rampant scrutinization on every marvel feat above planet. Surely.
Nice joke.Every verse should be scrutinized to the same degree as we scrutinize Marvel and we are by far one of the most leniant websites on the entire internet when it comes to Marvel anyway.
It's true. MFTL+ Thor gets you laughed at from every corner of the internet.Nice joke.
Well I know places that don'tIt's true. MFTL+ Thor gets you laughed at from every corner of the internet.
Lemme Guess. Spacebattles? Or is it Comicvine? No no, how about Characterrant?It's true. MFTL+ Thor gets you laughed at from every corner of the internet.
Yep I totally remember that time where every corner of the internet attacked us for MFTL+ Thor.It's true. MFTL+ Thor gets you laughed at from every corner of the internet.
No it doesn't.But back on subject, every debunk provided so far to the three feats I brought up requires a wiki wide revision of standards before they can be proper debunks
low 2-C doen’t have a joule value though.Surface Area is mandatory for explosion feats Cal. Being caught in a universe-destroying explosion never scales to the full-size of the blast to the person.
Why would a blast that breaks time on a 4D axis hit me on the 3D axis.low 2-C doen’t have a joule value though.
thats what I’m saying! You said that he wasn’t in the epicenter, however that’s irrelevant because even if he took 1/1000 of the attack, there is no way to quantify the energy he survived.Why would a blast that breaks time on a 4D axis hit me on the 3D axis.