• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the logical conclusion of defeating someone who's superior to you in sheer power without amps, when he has amps, is that those amps aren't very high.
 
Bowser is typically equal to or stronger than Mario in just his base form so saying Mario is stronger than a Grand Star-amped Bowser is sus, though Mario defeats other enemies powered by Grand Stars.
Either Mario is weaker than Base Bowser (Which he is, Bowser is always portrayed as physically superior and there are several games where it's a game mechanic that Mario can't defeat Bowser normally), or Mario is somehow magically stronger than Bowser.

The answer is that Mario isn't stronger than Amped Bowser because in Mario Galaxy you defeat Bowser by having Bowser burn his ass on the reactor so Bowser is stunned and then hitting him. It's a game mechanic that Bowser is invincible if not stunned first.

 
Either Mario is weaker than Base Bowser (Which he is, Bowser is always portrayed as physically superior and there are several games where it's a game mechanic that Mario can't defeat Bowser normally), or Mario is somehow magically stronger than Bowser.

The answer is that Mario isn't stronger than Amped Bowser because in Mario Galaxy you defeat Bowser by having Bowser burn his ass on the reactor so Bowser is stunned and then hitting him. It's a game mechanic that Bowser is invincible if not stunned first.


You can still survive his attacks, though, and Mario obviously isn't a stone wall.
 
Also my guys.

Both Olly and Mario are Amped in the final battle of Origami King since they fight in a place made of pure Origami Energy:



"This place is made of pure Origami Power. It strengthened him, so it could strengthen you too!"

This is something that should be made clear in the OP. Blaze presented this as if it was Base Mario fighting Base Olly when both were amped. Olly doesn't have the power to fold the fabric of reality on his own. Just like with TTYD where Mario needs to be amped to even hurt the Shadow Queen.
 
It might have just been a honest mistake, let's not go assuming the worst.
 
I told Blaze to wait for me...

Unless these feats I’m about to mention are in the OP, I don’t agree with them.

Wario fighting Black Jewel (3-A to Low 2-C)
Rosalina ranking universal resets (Low 2-C)
Paper Mario, Peach, and Bowser surviving Sammer’s Kingdom collapse (Low 2-C)

Edit: ...huh, he actually used em.
 
Wario fighting Black Jewel (3-A to Low 2-C)
Provide evidence that Black Jewel creating a universe scales to AP and durability.

Rosalina ranking universal resets (Low 2-C)
Rosalina casually shields Mario and friends from an explosion that would be lethal to them. They don't scale to her. Also accounting for size the feat isn't going to be Low 2-C on Rosalina assuming she isn't shielding it herself either.

Paper Mario, Peach, and Bowser surviving Sammer’s Kingdom collapse (Low 2-C)
This is not Low 2-C as I explained, because they weren't in the epicenter of the explosion and were thrown elsewhere when the dimension collapsed. Again, account for size, this isn't going to scale to the full universe-stretching blast.
 
Surface Area is mandatory for explosion feats Cal. Being caught in a universe-destroying explosion never scales to the full-size of the blast to the person.
 
Show me tier 2 feats ever having to do with surface area once and before you’re bringing it up now and it being accepted and I’ll close this thread right here, right now.

This feat. Blaastar surviving inside the Big Bang.

The feat itself:



As you can see this was calced at 38.62213193 exatons/second which is Moon level, and has been used as supporting evidence for The Thing (Who beats up Blaastar in the same arc) for 4 whole years.

You can close the thread now.
 
@Rtx.
No. No it doesn’t. Heck, I can count on my fingers how many times a feat above tier 4 accounts for surface area (and every time it involves comics but imma sip my tea there). Basically, you’d have to completely revise the VSBW system in order to debunk this.
 

This feat. Blaastar surviving inside the Big Bang.

The feat itself:



As you can see this was calced at 38.62213193 exatons/second which is Moon level, and has been used as supporting evidence for The Thing (Who beats up Blaastar in the same arc) for 4 whole years.

You can close the thread now.

Did you even read my post?

“You’ll get that one Marvel dude that would be uni literally on any other verse, and that’s it.”

This wasn’t even an edit.
 
Does a Low 2-C explosion still account for surface area?
All explosions must account for the area that hits you. An explosion that destroys space-time is not going to hit you with all its power. In fact, it's capability to destroy space and time is entirely irrelevant to the portion of the blast that will still hit you.
 
Nobody will agree with Iron Man > Superman or MHS street tiers outside of this wiki.

That said, let's stay on topic folks.
 
But back on subject, every debunk provided so far to the three feats I brought up requires a wiki wide revision of standards before they can be proper debunks. They’re all stuff that haven’t come up before today or at best, provided to one dude out of over twenty thousand.
 
But back on subject, every debunk provided so far to the three feats I brought up requires a wiki wide revision of standards before they can be proper debunks
No it doesn't.

Rosalina's feat is super vague and we don't even see it happening. She could have shielded herself and Mario doesn't even scale to her.

You have yet to prove why the Wario thing scales to AP.
 
Leaving this aside, all the other feats have glaring issues. Most notably the vague ass statements from the RPG games that are devoid of any context.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top