-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Lord Boros vs Pikachu *Intense Laughing* Here we go again.
- Thread starter Phoenks
- Start date
- 825
- 109
Reminds me of how Ultra Sonic lost to Godoka, Godoka lost to True Enerjak, and True Enerjak went incon with Ultra Sonic.
- 1,579
- 248
That's an ABC fallacy you just made.GyroNutz said:
For false premise: someone is saying A is stronger than B, B is stronger than C, so A is stronger than C, therefore A beats C, which is a false premise because other factors influence who beats who than strength.
For false analogy: someone is saying, A>B>C because A beat B and B beat C, therefore A>C and should beat C. This is false analogy because they're treating the characters as analogous to numbers to apply the transitive property, but characters abilities are more than just numbers and therefore can't be treated as analogous to them.
I'm smarter than a moderator, give me a higher rank because I'm better than them.
That was a joke btw! xD
Similar threads
