Anomalous_N_I_W_D_E
He/Him- 3,579
- 2,105
Yeaaaaah no about that:But I think the better MU for my money would be Bugs vs Mister Myxlplyx.
Hence the 1-C consistencies I said earlier. LT IS THAT VOLATILE.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeaaaaah no about that:But I think the better MU for my money would be Bugs vs Mister Myxlplyx.
Yeaaaaah no about that:
Hence the 1-C consistencies I said earlier. LT IS THAT VOLATILE.
We usually can't use stuff from theory videos like that for evidence
I am aware that some eyebrows will be raised from the more over the top displays, but let me explain that I listed this video to mainly reference the MXZLPLTK feat, which was the easiest source to find at the time.The "wish I didn't exist" feat he brings up isn't even Universal+. It's just Causality Manipulation.
Okay yeah no hold up, I get there were strict rules and whatnot regarding such, but even then I have major issues with that.We can't use any crossovers as stated before, unfortunately.
What about Taz vs Wonder Woman?While I am aware that Supes has made his cameo in Superior Duck, but do we even know for sure if that's even the real one from the comics?
Is that one from the comic?What about Taz vs Wonder Woman?
YesIs that one from the comic?
Are you talking about Back in Action? Because Daffy did bring up the fact that he was Duck Dodgers in itBy the way, is canon the Live action movie? It would merged duck dodgers with Daffy
Yeah, i think there also severals feats for humansAre you talking about Back in Action? Because Daffy did bring up the fact that he was Duck Dodgers in it
Yes the civilians themselves are powerful.Yeah, i think there also severals feats for humans
Also yes, Tiny Toons confirmed that the Duck Dodgers shorts are canon.By the way, is canon the Live action movie? It would merged duck dodgers with Daffy
Ah, noice, i guess we can merged, by the way what are the version that not are Canon in general for everyone?Also yes, Tiny Toons confirmed that the Duck Dodgers shorts are canon.
The timeline we've established is here.And now, the definitive Looney Tunes canon! (until we can find more evidence)
ACTORS CANON: Merrie Melodies Shorts and OG Looney Tunes Cartoons - - > Tiny Toon Adventures - - > Taz-Mania (Consistent with actors canon) - - - > Animaniacs - - - > Pinky and The Brain - - - > The Sylvester and Tweety Mysteries (Doesn't contradict anything and supports evidence for a later connection) - - - > Freakazoid - - - > Space Jam (Consistently exists as a film in-universe but due to the "actors doing real stunts" stuff, physical feats from it are valid, but not skill feats) - - - > Looney Tunes: Back In Action (Consistent with the "actors" canon and even then, is revealed to be another in-universe film at the end that Daffy was tricked into acting in) - - - > Duck Dodgers (Consistent with actors canon. Can't find the episode just yet, but it's stated that Bugs Bunny turned down a cameo for this show) --- > Animaniacs 2020
MODERN STUFF: New Looney Tunes - - - > Looney Tunes Cartoons
Stuff that doesn't fit:
Baby Looney Tunes (If you were expecting Baby Looney Tunes to be an important part of the canon, idk what to tell you)
The Looney Tunes Show (Exists as it's own separate thing)
Loonatics Unleashed (Is it's own thing)
Space Jam: A New Legacy (Does this have the toons referencing their old stuff? Yes. Does it have The Warners? Yes. Does it contradict literally everything and have virtually no consistency even within itself!??! Yes)
Comics/Video Games/Web Cartoons (Don't know where to put these, but I know there are comic runs that reference previous shorts which should put them in the actors canon. Otherwise, they belong in miscellaneous or their own separate stuff)
Even humans in the LT verse have up to Mid Tier Toon Physiology. Though maybe not Brendan Frasier's character as he's live-action.Yeah, i think there also severals feats for humans
I guess those humans are just built differentEven humans in the LT verse have up to Mid Tier Toon Physiology. Though maybe not Brendan Frasier's character as he's live-action.
It's because while those humans are "real", they're still in the 3-D reality of toons. The Roger Ebert parody character for example demonstrates cartoon physics and regen. The Siegfied and Roy parodies they meet in Magic Time do the same. There was a character in Tiny Toons who represented the censors wanting to ban all looniness so that the world would replace them with educational content, and later it was revealed that she had some looniness in her herself. Everyone in the 3-D plane of existence has looniness/cartoon physics. The only person who doesn't is The Animator from Animaniacs 2020 on the 4-D plane, because she's not a toon herself. She just makes toons.I guess those humans are just built different
We literally have DC characters crossovering/referenced alongside LT since the very beginning in their own right, they are literally as personal Warner Bros properties:
Yes. For a gag. As a joke.Potentially just far more that I shared in Firelds LT Sandbox Blog that was shown here awhile ago somewhere (Yes I had history with LT way back also, hence why he has recommended me here and it once more caught my eye as well).
Overall there are ALSO connections on it's own, and it's admittedly baffling given how far we have come with said connections, hell even Batman has appeared in one of the Animaniacs episodes like Bugs did from a VHS tape immersion thing.
Black Hat is different. These shows and Villanious are not technically canon to each other. Different versions of those shows in the Villainous universe however do exist. Black Hat proves that he can beat Anti-Pops but this in itself is not acceptable. He explains that in that specific scene, Anti-Pops can do a universe-busting feat and then he proves he is superior. None of Regular Show in itself otherwise is canon to Villainous. Only that scene. Tiny Toons operates on different logic since the release of the cartoons themselves have proven themselves to be events that have happened in that verse and the people who star in them are central characters in that verse. However, the same cannot be said for canonical versions of Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman. If anything, the "Looney Tunes" versions of those characters are canon to Looney Tunes, and only feats they have demonstrated within the cartoon would apply, just like if Deadpool couldn't regen himself from a puddle in Marvel vs. Capcom like he can in the comics, the ability would not be on his profile.Even with the denial of it all, I say baffling for a reason as "crossovers" have technically gained the slip here. Like this character for instance that has irked me for awhile as a result.
It won't. Ever.Now yes... I too am fine with the already OP Bugs scaling, but I feel like throwing this now regardless, as while it may not seem like it now, it still could be much more crucial then some people currently think. I sure as hell am not saying we should add it over there now... Just a thought.
I’m leaving it there because it specifically pertains to an explanation that does not specify regen or reviving. Specifically that they can’t be killed. You never explained why it was wrong and after some input from more knowledgable people, they said it would fit. You just saying “it’s just wrong” isn’t enough to warrant people believing you.Maid you should remove this from the page. Its just wrong.
- Immortality (Type 5): WoG states that nothing can permanently kill Toons on the Animaniacs casts' levels.
I already told you why its wrong. The quotes are too vague to use for Immortality Type 5 where you have to prove that Death and Life dont effect you. Can I see which knowledgable people said this?I’m leaving it there because it specifically pertains to an explanation that does not specify regen or reviving. Specifically that they can’t be killed. You never explained why it was wrong and after some input from more knowledgable people, they said it would fit. You just saying “it’s just wrong” isn’t enough to warrant people believing you.
I am not talking for that I am saying right now these quotes are not enough for Type 5, if theres more then I would be happy to see Immo 5 for Toons.On that matter, Type 5 is backed up by the additions to Looney Tunes cosmology anyways, so it's supporting evidence for that as well.
Friends on Discord. Brought them the context for why this was said and in this situation, Dot was absolutely sure of the situation and was worried that they were about to die, perceiving whatever was about to kill them as a threat capable of doing so. Despite this, they ended up surviving, prompting the WoG statement above. The same regarding Yakko's concerns on Dot's universal kaboom. And these is the same toons that can regen and survive immense amounts of pain, and live in a universe where there is an abstract embodiment of Death. Adding to this, they can leave Heaven and Hell as they please. The only people who can negate this are the animators with their layered plot hax. You've been wrong about certain abilities before, which is why I wanted an outside opinion.I already told you why its wrong. The quotes are too vague to use for Immortality Type 5 where you have to prove that Death and Life dont effect you. Can I see which knowledgable people said this?
I am %100 sure “Cannot die” quotes are too vague for Immo 5. Theres further proof? Sure. But only these? No.Friends on Discord. Brought them the context for why this was said and in this situation, Dot was absolutely sure of the situation and was worried that they were about to die, perceiving whatever was about to kill them as a threat capable of doing so. Despite this, they ended up surviving, prompting the WoG statement above. The same regarding Yakko's concerns on Dot's universal kaboom. And these is the same toons that can regen and survive immense amounts of pain, and live in a universe where there is an abstract embodiment of Death. Adding to this, they can leave Heaven and Hell as they please. The only people who can negate this are the animators with their layered plot hax. You've been wrong about certain abilities before, which is why I wanted an outside opinion.
If even Death can’t kill them and they can just freely move about heaven and hell, then I think that would warrant Type 5. You’re also looking at a list that hasn’t even been updated for a while, and already you’re moving onto assumptions. Please wait until I’ve finished it before assuming I’m wrong.I am %100 sure “Cannot die” quotes are too vague for Immo 5. Theres further proof? Sure. But only these? No.
You are not wrong if they also do thoseIf even Death can’t kill them and they can just freely move about heaven and hell, then I think that would warrant Type 5. You’re also looking at a list that hasn’t even been updated for a while, and already you’re moving onto assumptions. Please wait until I’ve finished it before assuming I’m wrong.
Just gave my opinion about it.I am already stressed out as it is with this impossible CRT. Please wait until I have a finished project instead of doing all this shit.
You didn’t give your opinion. You told me to get rid of it. On a WIP page that is not even halfway done. It’s imperfect because it’s not finished and having to step back over and over is not helping the process.Just gave my opinion about it.
Yes that was my opinionYou didn’t give your opinion. You told me to get rid of it.
Anyways since you have more proof I wont argue about this furtherOn a WIP page that is not even halfway done. It’s imperfect because it’s not finished and having to step back over and over is not helping the process.
Yes let's let the user chill for now. I know that feeling.I am already stressed out as it is with this impossible CRT. Please wait until I have a finished project instead of doing all this shit.