Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think we should know that they manipulated logic to enable them to do such things.Toon Force also does not qualify, as while the actions one can perform are often absurd, they do not inherently violate deductive reasoning.
No image is kinda icky imo.Yeah that all seems pretty much fine now.
Although, I wonder if it'd be better to simply have no image.
Yeah I couldn't think of a better way to word that. I mean if you're violating deductive reasoning (i.e. logic) when it's supposed to apply to you then I'd say you're manipulating logic.And, I'm not sure if "violating deductive reasoning" is something we should consider logic manipulation, but that is implied by this line:
I think we should know that they manipulated logic to enable them to do such things.
I'd just say smth likeYeah I couldn't think of a better way to word that.
as while the actions one can perform are often absurd or in some sense "illogical", they're not achieved by altering the fundamental logical system of reality.
A story having a contradiction or something that we view as impossible does not mean that the responsible character(s) have logic manipulation.I mean if you're violating deductive reasoning (i.e. logic) when it's supposed to apply to you then I'd say you're manipulating logic.
Essentially this, yeah, although I'd add that I don't consider this to mean that the ability is "fake" by any means, it's just that what counts as "logic" can differ based on the verse, and doesn't necessarily have to mean "the logic that governs all possible worlds".Tier it based on feats, and a feat of it affecting a High 1-A+ Type 2 structure is a contradiction, unless done by a Tier 0.
"1 Ultima hour = 1 day" betsomewhere in the next 20 hours
Do you still have a problem with the image?Last I commented, I had two issues (image, and one bit of wording), and the wording was fixed.
Fixed.No new substantive issues have popped up, although there is the less-substantive one of how the Wikipedia links were done suboptimally.
Yeah, but that's my personal view, not something ultra-important, worth blocking the page over.Do you still have a problem with the image?
Is there a specific problem you have? I'd like to consider your concerns, and the concerns of other staff, even if I don't really have to for the page to be accepted.Yeah, but that's my personal view, not something ultra-important, worth blocking the page over.
This power seems like one that's very difficult to represent visually.Is there a specific problem you have? I'd like to consider your concerns, and the concerns of other staff, even if I don't really have to for the page to be accepted.
Tbh, unless we use Light Novel scan, which is all about texts, we don't have much choice over image, i could try to find something in MGK anime when i get back home with my PC thoughThis power seems like one that's very difficult to represent visually.
I prefer images on power pages to, as much as possible:
The current one fails on all three fronts.
- Be visually clear about their effect, even without reading the accompanying description.
- Not require reading text in the image.
- Not be a long video/gif.
Honestly, that's probably because it's difficult to even conceptualize.This power seems like one that's very difficult to represent visually.
1 seems difficult to pull off, for the reason mentioned above. 2 seems easy enough if we can find a source that isn't an anime (or at least an english dubbed one). I'm not sure if 3 is even feasible, since I highly doubt a single static image (or even a short gif) could fully depict a proper example of such an ability.I prefer images on power pages to, as much as possible:
The current one fails on all three fronts.
- Be visually clear about their effect, even without reading the accompanying description.
- Not require reading text in the image.
- Not be a long video/gif.
That would be appreciated. I'd like there to be an image, since no image feels weird.Tbh, unless we use Light Novel scan, which is all about texts, we don't have much choice over image, i could try to find something in MGK anime when i get back home with my PC though
For example, it might be tempting to say that a logic manipulator who is explained to be able to manipulate logic to change reasoning such that being burned does not alter his state of being, would be able to do a similar thing to defend against water-based attacks. However, for a logic-breaking power, there is no true guarantee that it would abide by such a seemingly sensible pattern and the principle of explosion would indeed prevent such reasoning.
I wouldn't expect Logic Manipulation to get a tier, unless it can effect the entirety of a High 3-A or above space, or it's somehow used to manifest/destroy something that would take a quantifiable amount of energy.Checking the draft right now. I'm interested in this bit:
How does that relate to the exact tier of the ability? It seems to be saying that, because it's paradoxical, we can't actually make sensible deductions about it, and hence we go with what verse says. So does this mean that we only give it an exact tier based on whatever scale the verse sets out for it?
Yes.How does that relate to the exact tier of the ability? It seems to be saying that, because it's paradoxical, we can't actually make sensible deductions about it, and hence we go with what verse says. So does this mean that we only give it an exact tier based on whatever scale the verse sets out for it?
You can swap "tier" with any tier-adjacent thing you like for the purposes of that question (e.g. "Does Logic Manipulation automatically give [tier] level range?" and etc). What I'm interested in is whether we set an exact scale for the ability or just say "It's impossible to deduce anything out of that, so we just go with the verse's word."I wouldn't expect Logic Manipulation to get a tier, unless it can effect the entirety of a High 3-A or above space, or it's somehow used to manifest/destroy something that would take a quantifiable amount of energy.
The only scale I've seen proposed is High 1-A+ Type 2, which I disagreed with.You can swap "tier" with any tier-adjacent thing you like for the purposes of that question (e.g. "Does Logic Manipulation automatically give [tier] level range?" and etc). What I'm interested in is whether we set an exact scale for the ability or just say "It's impossible to deduce anything out of that, so we just go with the verse's word."
@DontTalkDT do you have any opinions about the draft @Jin2188 proposed?I've updated the draft, removing the AI-generated thumbnail and reworking the Defining Logic section. Here's the link again so you don't have to dig through the thread history.
Technically it's DT's draft, I just edited it.@DontTalkDT do you have any opinions about the draft @Jin2188 proposed?
I do, but it ties into other stuff. Should have a complete response finished in the next few days.@DontTalkDT do you have any opinions about the draft @Jin2188 proposed?
Yeah, don't believe I have anything else to add to that then. Draft seems adequate.The only scale I've seen proposed is High 1-A+ Type 2, which I disagreed with.
So, we go with the verse's word instead.
@DontTalkDT do you have any opinions about the draft @Jin2188 proposed?
@DontTalkDTI do, but it ties into other stuff. Should have a complete response finished in the next few days.