• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Logic Manipulation Ability Page Creation

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've updated the draft, removing the AI-generated thumbnail and reworking the Defining Logic section. Here's the link again so you don't have to dig through the thread history.
 
Yeah that all seems pretty much fine now.

Although, I wonder if it'd be better to simply have no image.

And, I'm not sure if "violating deductive reasoning" is something we should consider logic manipulation, but that is implied by this line:
Toon Force also does not qualify, as while the actions one can perform are often absurd, they do not inherently violate deductive reasoning.
I think we should know that they manipulated logic to enable them to do such things.
 
Yeah that all seems pretty much fine now.

Although, I wonder if it'd be better to simply have no image.
No image is kinda icky imo.
And, I'm not sure if "violating deductive reasoning" is something we should consider logic manipulation, but that is implied by this line:

I think we should know that they manipulated logic to enable them to do such things.
Yeah I couldn't think of a better way to word that. I mean if you're violating deductive reasoning (i.e. logic) when it's supposed to apply to you then I'd say you're manipulating logic.
 
Yeah I couldn't think of a better way to word that.
I'd just say smth like
as while the actions one can perform are often absurd or in some sense "illogical", they're not achieved by altering the fundamental logical system of reality.
I mean if you're violating deductive reasoning (i.e. logic) when it's supposed to apply to you then I'd say you're manipulating logic.
A story having a contradiction or something that we view as impossible does not mean that the responsible character(s) have logic manipulation.
 
Have we agreed on a tier for the power yet? To my understanding the past discussion has been really about whether it's feasible to rank it as by default High 1-A+.
 
Tier it based on feats, and a feat of it affecting a High 1-A+ Type 2 structure is a contradiction, unless done by a Tier 0.
 
Tier it based on feats, and a feat of it affecting a High 1-A+ Type 2 structure is a contradiction, unless done by a Tier 0.
Essentially this, yeah, although I'd add that I don't consider this to mean that the ability is "fake" by any means, it's just that what counts as "logic" can differ based on the verse, and doesn't necessarily have to mean "the logic that governs all possible worlds".
 
Last edited:
I think my vote don't matter much, but yeah, i'm good with Jin2188 draft and reasons
 
Last I commented, I had two issues (image, and one bit of wording), and the wording was fixed.

No new substantive issues have popped up, although there is the less-substantive one of how the Wikipedia links were done suboptimally.
 
Do you still have a problem with the image?
Yeah, but that's my personal view, not something ultra-important, worth blocking the page over.
 
Yeah, but that's my personal view, not something ultra-important, worth blocking the page over.
Is there a specific problem you have? I'd like to consider your concerns, and the concerns of other staff, even if I don't really have to for the page to be accepted.
 
Is there a specific problem you have? I'd like to consider your concerns, and the concerns of other staff, even if I don't really have to for the page to be accepted.
This power seems like one that's very difficult to represent visually.

I prefer images on power pages to, as much as possible:
  • Be visually clear about their effect, even without reading the accompanying description.
  • Not require reading text in the image.
  • Not be a long video/gif.
The current one fails on all three fronts.
 
This power seems like one that's very difficult to represent visually.

I prefer images on power pages to, as much as possible:
  • Be visually clear about their effect, even without reading the accompanying description.
  • Not require reading text in the image.
  • Not be a long video/gif.
The current one fails on all three fronts.
Tbh, unless we use Light Novel scan, which is all about texts, we don't have much choice over image, i could try to find something in MGK anime when i get back home with my PC though
 
This power seems like one that's very difficult to represent visually.
Honestly, that's probably because it's difficult to even conceptualize.
I prefer images on power pages to, as much as possible:
  • Be visually clear about their effect, even without reading the accompanying description.
  • Not require reading text in the image.
  • Not be a long video/gif.
The current one fails on all three fronts.
1 seems difficult to pull off, for the reason mentioned above. 2 seems easy enough if we can find a source that isn't an anime (or at least an english dubbed one). I'm not sure if 3 is even feasible, since I highly doubt a single static image (or even a short gif) could fully depict a proper example of such an ability.

That being said, I definitely see your points (in hindsight I don't really like the current image either), and I'd like to address them if possible.
Tbh, unless we use Light Novel scan, which is all about texts, we don't have much choice over image, i could try to find something in MGK anime when i get back home with my PC though
That would be appreciated. I'd like there to be an image, since no image feels weird.
 
As I said, I think it's fine to not have an image. I'm already not entirely happy with Damage Boost needing to have a description for the image (although this is better than it used to be, since it visually indicates a condition and an extreme attack). With Logic Manipulation being more esoteric, I think it's more reasonable for it to lack an image.

But maybe we could take inspiration from Conceptual Manipulation, and have some diagram representing differing logical systems.
 
Checking the draft right now. I'm interested in this bit:

For example, it might be tempting to say that a logic manipulator who is explained to be able to manipulate logic to change reasoning such that being burned does not alter his state of being, would be able to do a similar thing to defend against water-based attacks. However, for a logic-breaking power, there is no true guarantee that it would abide by such a seemingly sensible pattern and the principle of explosion would indeed prevent such reasoning.

How does that relate to the exact tier of the ability? It seems to be saying that, because it's paradoxical, we can't actually make sensible deductions about it, and hence we go with what verse says. So does this mean that we only give it an exact tier based on whatever scale the verse sets out for it?
 
Checking the draft right now. I'm interested in this bit:

How does that relate to the exact tier of the ability? It seems to be saying that, because it's paradoxical, we can't actually make sensible deductions about it, and hence we go with what verse says. So does this mean that we only give it an exact tier based on whatever scale the verse sets out for it?
I wouldn't expect Logic Manipulation to get a tier, unless it can effect the entirety of a High 3-A or above space, or it's somehow used to manifest/destroy something that would take a quantifiable amount of energy.
 
How does that relate to the exact tier of the ability? It seems to be saying that, because it's paradoxical, we can't actually make sensible deductions about it, and hence we go with what verse says. So does this mean that we only give it an exact tier based on whatever scale the verse sets out for it?
Yes.

To prescribe an exact tier to this (or most abilities) by default writes us into a corner where we either ignore what the verse actually portrays or drastically blow an ability out of proportion from the implication despite no feats at that level.
 
I wouldn't expect Logic Manipulation to get a tier, unless it can effect the entirety of a High 3-A or above space, or it's somehow used to manifest/destroy something that would take a quantifiable amount of energy.
You can swap "tier" with any tier-adjacent thing you like for the purposes of that question (e.g. "Does Logic Manipulation automatically give [tier] level range?" and etc). What I'm interested in is whether we set an exact scale for the ability or just say "It's impossible to deduce anything out of that, so we just go with the verse's word."
 
You can swap "tier" with any tier-adjacent thing you like for the purposes of that question (e.g. "Does Logic Manipulation automatically give [tier] level range?" and etc). What I'm interested in is whether we set an exact scale for the ability or just say "It's impossible to deduce anything out of that, so we just go with the verse's word."
The only scale I've seen proposed is High 1-A+ Type 2, which I disagreed with.

So, we go with the verse's word instead.
 
Still worth checking though, we need to see what he thinks as the OP, by the way I'm fine with your suggestion.
 
Okay so we got Dereck and Vietthai on board, and Agnaa with the caveat of changing the image. Ultima seems to be undecided, and we don't know DT's opinion yet.

Would anyone else like to share their opinion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top