- 19,202
- 28,274
Lightning doesn’t make that soundBump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lightning doesn’t make that soundBump.
Lightning doesn't exist.Lightning doesn’t make that sound
The shots are exactly the same, since we see the two other pillars are in the same order. I remember Jvando bringing up an issue with that curve in the roof before and noted that it shouldn't be used, but I can't really remember his exact reasons.Calc will be up when it is up.
Regarding the pixelscaling; I think that the reason there is a small discripency between the "front and back" of the pillar in this shot, is because we're actually seeing two different sides of the pillar.
Looking at the pillar in this shot, we can see that the "front" of the pillar appears shorter because of the dome of the roof compared to the back of the pillar.
So I think that the current pixelscaling I've got that should still work.
I've posted both versions. Sent them off for evaluation. They'll probably be evaluated by the time I'm awake tomorrow. Will discuss any potential issues only after they've been evaluated.Bump.
2 Inches.Evaluate this
2 Inches.
Don’t do it, they don’t deserve itThis might just motivate me to work on the Bijū scaling thread more.
Don’t do it, they don’t deserve it
Don’t do it, they don’t deserve it
Oh can ya show us?I've posted both versions. Sent them off for evaluation. They'll probably be evaluated by the time I'm awake tomorrow. Will discuss any potential issues only after they've been evaluated.
The full height is compressed; it's just that the average distance travelled by the material is equivalent to half the height of it. I explained it to Wrath up above.
Could you evaluate the calcs by any chance? Sorry, I know we've been asking a lot of you lately, but unfortunately not that many people are even willing to look at Naruto stuff.I see. Okay then.
Yuh, we basically divided by 8.Iirc we did something like total number of fire jutsu = kirin, and divided by the total number to get the average fire jutsu output?
Agreed.It was accepted in this thread. In any case, this really isn't the thread for it.
Databooks state his katon can create the thunderclouds for Kirin +Honestly not sure about that method for finding the AP of the Katons. What was the exact reasoning for that against?
@Arc7Kuroi; you of all people know that people are allowed to change their minds on here.
What is the ap of the two calcs?Having looked at both calcs, I’ll give my opinion on which I think is more accurate and why.
Personally, I believe the second version is best as it keeps the pixel scaling to a single panel, eliminating as much panel to panel art inconsistency as possible. Additionally, it makes use of the accepted Kirin cloud height that comes from an ang size based on the canon distance statement from Hinata.
On the other hand, the first calc has more margin for error as it pixel scales across multiple panels. But more importantly the image used to find the wall height uses a super tiny image of Sasuke, which I find particularly meh because that undetailed Sasuke is more likely to have proportion inconsistencies than a closer up counter part. This issue solely exists within the first calc and isn’t present at all in the second calc.
Otherwise the methods for finding AP are the exact same. So, since the second calc offers far less opportunities for errors from inconsistencies with pixel scaling than the first calc does, I believe the second calc is objectively superior.
Yeah I see what you mean I missed that link, my primary issue tho is with using midget Sasuke.@Arc7Kuroi; just want to quickly interject to say that the 2nd method technically uses two panels for pixelscaling. The first one to find the height of the clouds above the ground which is linked to at the beginning of the calc, and then the second one for finding the dimensions of the mountain.
Not disagreeing with your conclusion necessarily; just that the initial assessment is a little misleading.
To add onto arcs issues about consistency, I'd like to quote my previous issues I had as I don't think they were properly addressed. For the first point, the pillar has an inconsistent height between both of the scans used to px scale.Few issues with this calc.
1.) Your scaling in this image doesn't line up with how you scaled in this image as you used the back of the pillar instead of the front like you used in the fist picture.
2.) In this image you stopped scaling, but we can clearly see there is far more to the mountain that you decided not to account for. The diameter is also longer as well, which the text bubble seems to be in the way of.
2.) In this image you stopped scaling, but we can clearly see there is far more to the mountain that you decided not to account for. The diameter is also longer as well, which the text bubble seems to be in the way of.
That doesn't work as we see they are the same size in the first image where Sasuke is standing on it.I addressed this part up above. The front of the pillar appears smaller due to the rising of the roof. We can see this from the other angles too.
The front and the sides are not the same size.That doesn't work as we see they are the same size in the first image where Sasuke is standing on it.
I just px scaled both of them and got 311 for the back one and 313 for the front one.The front and the sides are not the same size.