Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe if we treating Kirby as a 3 dimensional verse with time, then what say if Another Dimension can been argued as being a 4 dimensional construct that contain the universe or something akin to that.That scan, as far as I see, is the only one that can solidly support a Low 1-C rating in there. I believe I've already talked about how, even in the most generous of interpretations, "exceeding space and time" can be done as a 4-dimensional object. Reason is that, if you have the same amount of dimensions as a timeline, you obviously can't exist inside of the spatial subset where its inhabitants live (One dimension lower than the full continuum), and thus would be relegated into directly inhabiting its hypervolume or existing outside of it, relative to it in the same way you exist relative to other 3-dimensional objects around you.
I was thinking along the lines if the dimensions are actually treated as timelines or pocket dimensions. Also it is a misconception as a universe are technically treated as spatial dimensions + one dimension of time, not the other way around as universes can contain timelines or pocket dimension for that matter.Ik what it says but it does contain timelines as it can drag people from different time and spaces into the kirby universe.
Also containing dimensions but not timelines makes no sense as timelines are the space of a universe+ it's time and if there isn't a timeline then time wouldn't flow and thus it would only contain space without any movment.
Not necessarily as time is technically a dimensionless unit as time isn’t always treated as a dimension all time.You didn't get my words. A universe that isn't a timeline cannot function like a normal universe as there would be no time flow
It is treated as the fourth dimension in most cases and thus it is treated as such in this wiki.Not necessarily as time is technically a dimensionless unit as time isn’t always treated as a dimension all time.
Yeah, but there are times when there is a 4 spatial dimension without time.It is treated as the fourth dimension in most cases and thus it is treated as such in this wiki.
Time by itself is one dimensional. When added to a 3D universe, it becomes the 4th dimension.Yeah, but there are times when there is a 4 spatial dimension without time.
Anyway, I am neutral overall.
I know, but only when it is in theoretical physics and multiverses is where it is described. If it is time in general.Time by itself is one dimensional. When added to a 3D universe, it becomes the 4th dimension.
If I not mistaken, it is technically a case by case thing since there are some verses that may not use time as a dimension and goes by spatial dimensions only.In any case, that's not how the Wiki treats time.
Probably is. In any case, still neutral overall tbh.Pretty sure it's still the default assumption
physical
dimensions. I'm still willing to patiently wait for more staff and I'm open minded to more skepticism but what else is there to say at this point? The Twitter statement so blatantly conforms to our standards that it's almost a word for word comparison.CringeIt does not because it does not confirm the the quantity it exceeds is a qualitive difference. Just calling something a mathematical dimension is as much a non-evidence as referring to it as simple a dimension.
My opinion is unchanged, and no you posting about how you don’t think it makes sense and how it could be nothing but apply for Tier 1 and is a text box example that is exactly how the FAQ describes does not change my opinion.
Here is my advise, forget about kanji and meaning and all that, because the Wiki does not care about all this despite how you are so focused on it. We care about actual statements and feats that show actual evidence that the difference between dimensions are qualitative, and until Kirby has those statements it is not reaching beyond Tier 2.
"Dimension" can be used as a flowery word to mean "world" or "universe", but we know that it's not the case here. That's why specifying the dimensions are mathematical or physical is so important. Even if it wasn't, the FAQ would need to be changed again to suit that idea. This would be a decision I'd disagree with but I'd still see it as a win, personally. Two FAQ edits to deny one upgrade is pretty neat.It does not because it does not confirm the the quantity it exceeds is a qualitive difference. Just calling something a mathematical dimension is as much a non-evidence as referring to it as simple a dimension.
Your opinion may be unchanged, but do you still agree that the FAQ currently backs me up on this? Because it does. The same kind of goes for the statement on the speed page about how the space between dimensions is the 5th dimension... What's the deal with that? Does that need to be changed too? It's either misleading or contradicting.My opinion is unchanged, and no you posting about how you don’t think it makes sense and how it could be nothing but apply for Tier 1 and is a text box example that is exactly how the FAQ describes does not change my opinion.
...Bruh what? The Wiki doesn't care about meaning? That would make all statements unusable regardless of their source or language. Meaning is literally the most important aspect to figuring out a character's power because without it we can't even understand their stories, let alone make proper estimations and calculations about their potential. Without meaning, VS debating wouldn't even exist because feats, statements, estimations, educated guesses and power-scaling are all bound by meaning. I'm gonna be honest man. I don't feel like you're really listening to me. I'm sorry if my tone comes off as more hostile than it needs to be, but the thing is that we already went over this.Here is my advise, forget about kanji and meaning and all that, because the Wiki does not care about all this despite how you are so focused on it.
What kind of statements? Practically no verse ever says stuff like "This 5 dimensional plane of existence is uncountably infinitely superior to our 4 dimensional space-time continuum." Reality fiction differences can easily seal the deal, but they're not the only way to reach tier 1 for obvious reasons. To give your stance on how you believe tier 1 can be achieved without reality fiction interactions or statements that are basically never said, please go to this thread.We care about actual statements and feats that show actual evidence that the difference between dimensions are qualitative, and until Kirby has those statements it is not reaching beyond Tier 2.
To that I say "In what way could it be below that?" 4.5D can't be a thing because 2.5D doesn't make any sense either. You could say it's a bigger 4D hypervolume, but no one has explained how that's the most logical explanation given the nature of the statement. Not only does it seem like downplay for downplay's sake but I straight up see it as making objectively less sense.What we do have is a 100% higher dimensional plane of reality but what people can't understand is why it would be exactly 5D when it could be below that.
4.5D can't be a thing
Sonic the Comic's verse has universes that have 4.5 dimensions. That's the only one that springs to mind. I don't even know what 4.5D would be
Let's continue this discussion hereDoesn't Marvel's universe have 6.2 or 6.6 dimensions?
Really?!nah if this gets accepted kirby is becoming low 1-c
Dude, not necessarily.nah if this gets accepted kirby is becoming low 1-c
That seems like a bad mindset to have, but this is just the cosmology indeed.Really?!
Challenge, I leave if I see low 1-C Kirby, the mind **** is too much for my mind
I was kinda half joking and half serious, would definitely have to rethink my life choices thoughThat seems like a bad mindset to have, but this is just the cosmology indeed.
We need more mods apparentlyJesus Christ, it's literally 24-4 in favor, why the heck can't we just accept this already?
Whatever happened to democracy?