- 121
- 58
In chapter 64 of Assassination Classroom, Karma picked up a pot and destroyed large sections of a glass window.
The debate here is on whether said window used ballistic glass or regular glass.
On the request of @Therefir in this blog, I am making this CRT to list down the points in favour and against said glass window being ballistic.
Arguments In favour:
All the points listed against this proposal of this CRT and the original blog.
@Knowzn 's arguments:
"A notorious one with the police used by crime organizations from within and outside of Japan along with their financial backers, whilst being tight with government bigshots to the point where even police can’t even do an investigation on the large amounts of illegal activities (heck, they even turn down government officials without a second), with the hotel management also being accustomed to outside threats.
Its security is at a point where there are tons of guards outside the hotel along with a security system so complex that even a supercomputer far surpassing any existing AI can’t fully take control over it, with the building itself being built with terrorist attacks in mind.
Last but not least, there is a bit of foreshadowing here that shows the glass of the hotel with what seems to be a bullet stuck to it, showing that it couldn’t penetrate it. And there are still separate points made in the blog itself (Like the hotel being funded enough to have a literal helipad and Takaoka specifically choosing this one, and more if I missed any); we aren’t claiming that this random hotel now has ballistic glass. It literally makes less sense if it isn't ballistic or whatever."
Tohru's arguments:
Arguments against:
Elvis Freshely's arguments can be found:
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
Counterarguments to his arguments are:
First argument (Tohru): https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...00000000003455028&replyId=4400000000013315741
First argument (Knowzn): https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...00000000003455028&replyId=4400000000013315839
Second argument (Tohru): https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...00000000003455028&replyId=4400000000013318520
Anyway the purpose of this CRT is simply to come to the conclusion about the use of the ballistic glass assumption or at least, the values of destruction of ballistic glass for the purposes of calculating this feat as requested by the CGMs.
The debate here is on whether said window used ballistic glass or regular glass.
On the request of @Therefir in this blog, I am making this CRT to list down the points in favour and against said glass window being ballistic.
Arguments In favour:
All the points listed against this proposal of this CRT and the original blog.
@Knowzn 's arguments:
"A notorious one with the police used by crime organizations from within and outside of Japan along with their financial backers, whilst being tight with government bigshots to the point where even police can’t even do an investigation on the large amounts of illegal activities (heck, they even turn down government officials without a second), with the hotel management also being accustomed to outside threats.
Its security is at a point where there are tons of guards outside the hotel along with a security system so complex that even a supercomputer far surpassing any existing AI can’t fully take control over it, with the building itself being built with terrorist attacks in mind.
Last but not least, there is a bit of foreshadowing here that shows the glass of the hotel with what seems to be a bullet stuck to it, showing that it couldn’t penetrate it. And there are still separate points made in the blog itself (Like the hotel being funded enough to have a literal helipad and Takaoka specifically choosing this one, and more if I missed any); we aren’t claiming that this random hotel now has ballistic glass. It literally makes less sense if it isn't ballistic or whatever."
Tohru's arguments:
- The patterns of the glass cracking in the scans here and here appear similar to the ones of ballistic glass cracking when it resists a strong object as shown in irl images here.
- It resisted the brute strength of a person who can crush skulls.
- For reference, this calc was accepted and allowed to use the ballistic glass assumption because the scene was an aquarium, the only thing that is stated in that calc about aquariums are that they use glass "That's obviously wrong so we'll use ballistic glass since aquariums use like acrylic glass or tempered glass (whatever the case they use stronger glass than regular glass)". The acceptance of this calc all you need for the ballistic glass assumption is to prove that the strength of such a glass pane is stronger than that of regular glass, that much should suffice here.
- A concrete pot used shatter the glass was completely destroyed.
Arguments against:
Elvis Freshely's arguments can be found:
Karma destroys a glass wall
vsbattles.fandom.com
Karma destroys a glass wall
vsbattles.fandom.com
Counterarguments to his arguments are:
First argument (Tohru): https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...00000000003455028&replyId=4400000000013315741
First argument (Knowzn): https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...00000000003455028&replyId=4400000000013315839
Second argument (Tohru): https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...00000000003455028&replyId=4400000000013318520
Anyway the purpose of this CRT is simply to come to the conclusion about the use of the ballistic glass assumption or at least, the values of destruction of ballistic glass for the purposes of calculating this feat as requested by the CGMs.
Last edited:
