Arkenis
They/Them- 16,847
- 7,738
Yuki's can be conceptual since she's utilizing virtual mass, a hypothetical concept. But everyone else? You'd need to prove what other cursed techniques are even targeting as a concept. What is Yuta targeting? What is Todo targeting? What is Mai targeting? That is my issue with applying this to the entire verse. If you can't do that idk why this would be accepted.Yeah no.
Breaking reality founded upon a logical construct of circular definition would indeed need conceptual strength, that is the reason why Kenjaku is so surprised in the first place. Kenjaku then goes onto say "her mass can't be contained pragmatically or semantically" which is quite literally beyond definition or example.
Secondly, Yuki does not take on the logical consequences of her "mass manipulation". Kenjaku specifically notes she does not incur any weight or durability despite her "density" changing, which is why it's termed"virtual mass". Meaning it's conceptual and not physically existent, just the effects are. Based on this and the above, You would have to posit that Yuki must be immeasurable speed, power enough to nuetralie a blackhole, and actually does have immeasurable durability as well, despite us blatantly knowing that isn't the case and that she is using concept hax.
Thirdly, Kenjaku's use of "target concept" is very explicit. Yuki also confirms the target concept is Mass directly, and we know this is conceptual because all of Kenjaku's high grade cursed spirits CTs are now irrelevant to Yuki, the same we saw with Kenjaku's Ganesha curse which entangled concepts. Thus we know his earlier surmising about "Technique's target concept" is not limited to Yuki, or else she would not benefit from being immune to literally all of his high grade cursed technique.
This is further explored when Gojo defeats Sukuna by changing his target concept, and reaffirmed when Kenjaku watches Gojo die and correctly surmizes how Sukuna killed him, despite Kenjaku obviously not having the benefit of Mahoraga as the blue print.
There is a preponderance of evidence you need to actually counter instead of just saying "I don't think it's literal here" otherwise you are derailing.