• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Jiren Vs 160 ton Thermonuclear bomb

Errorsaness

Errorsaness

2,437
108
Jiren takes it point blank range


Battle takes place in the beggining of time in the Captain Underpants universe


The Jiren is using his full power to wistand it and Speed is equalised


Jiren: 7


The bombah: also 0
 
Look at all these plebs pretending to know what they're talking about. Everyone knows that thermonuclear bombs are Jiren's kryptonite, obviously he dies a painful death.
 
If we're talking about the force of the blast/the energy it puts out, he can certainly tank it, but the heat and radiation on the other hand very well might kill him, nothing suggests he can survive either.

"He can tank universal punches and ki blasts, of course he can survive a nuke."

Again, if we're just talking about the blast, then certainly, but nothing suggests or implies he can handle the sort of heat or radiation the bomb'll give off, there's more to a nuke than just the blast.
 
@Ricsi

The Burden of Proof is on you in this case. If there's no rule that says, "You can't." Then he certainly can do it, as it's not breaking a rule. He doesn't need to provide a rule that says, "You can.", he only needs to work with the absence of a rule statement, while you can't for your claim.

Anyways, why does this thread even exist to begin with? Can someone close it.
 
No. Burden of Proof literally says that a postive needs to be proven, a negative doesn't.

That's the very basis of it. You need to prove an asertion, not a denial.
 
"No. Burden of Proof literally says that a postive needs to be proven, a negative doesn't. "

The Burden of Proof states the person making a positive claim will have to prove it, but this isn't in all cases.

In your case, it would fall under a rule. He does not need to provide a rule which says you can. Because again, he only needs to work with the absence of the rule, because that's how rules work.
 
Giygas3 said:
"No. Burden of Proof literally says that a postive needs to be proven, a negative doesn't. "
The Burden of Proof states the person making a positive claim will have to prove it, but this isn't in all cases.

In your case, it would fall under a rule. He does not need to provide a rule which says you can. Because again, he only needs to work with the absence of the rule, because that's how rules work.
Click to expand...
No, it would not fall under a rule. It is physically impossible to add a victory or loss to a weapon profile, and you can't alter the default format of a profile without a crt.

I don't need to prove why he can't do something that is literally not an option.
 
" It is physically impossible to add a victory or loss to a weapon profile, and you can't alter the default format of a profile without a crt. "

Nonsense. I can certainly add a victory or loss to a weapon profile if it's allowed. The format is in, 'standard' form, that's not saying, "You cannot have a deviation from the standard form." for the profile. Unless there's a rule saying somewhere that I can't... But you need to provide it.

This is what rules are for, and you need to provide a rule saying he can't. He does not need to provide a rule saying he can.

"I don't need to prove why he can't do something that is literally not an option."

Claiming someone cannot do something with a profile would fall under rules, and it's your burden to SHOW the rule is there, not the other way around.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MrLuk2000
Jiren vs Cell Max
Replies
10
Views
2K
Eseseso
Eseseso
jojo123
Jiren (dbs) vs kyoya (beyblade)
Replies
18
Views
2K
Mickey1940
Mickey1940
Javenplayz253
Randomizer vs Super Bomb Survival (Javenplayz Vs Jeffrey)
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
Javenplayz253
Javenplayz253
Gilad_Hyperstar
Goku and Vegeta VS Jiren
Replies
27
Views
4K
CiscoTheSoto
CiscoTheSoto
SlendVeny
A Fight Without End: Who Can Topple Jiren?
Replies
35
Views
2K
Mickey1940
Mickey1940
Back
Top