• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

James Bond Physicality Revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
6,497
404
Ok, so right now we have 10A Bond Physically with Oddjob at 9C. We don't have a page for Jaws yet he would be comparable or even surpass Oddjob. Now, Bond can't do much to Oddjob so right now the tier looks ok. Except that was Sean Connery's interpretation of Bond, which while all versions are one in the same, different versions depict Bond with differences. Take Game Bond for example. In Everything or Nothing, you can push Jaws around and punch him into electric canisters which knock him out. This shows Bond should physically be tier 9, because while yes Connery's Bond struggled, game Bond didn't and he could knock Bond around. Game Bond should be in comparison to film Bond, especially Craig's Bond which is the newest version, which could take being shot by 9B-9B rifle fire, a massive drop and hitting the water. Plus at his best, he definitely scales to Game Bond

Therefore, while Connery's Bond should 10A, Craig's Bond like Game Bond should be between 9C-9A physically. I personally believe 9B is correct considering Craig's Bond scales to Game Bond who scales to a wall level Jaws. Jaws in that fight picks up the electric canisters and tosses them at you with no problem. Therefore, Oddjob should also be upgraded to 9B because he should be comparable to Craig's Bond and Jaws

In short

Connery Bond- 10A Upgrade Oddjob and Craig Bond to 9B
 
It should be 9B for Modern and Game Bond. Yet 10A for Connery's Bond. So maybe it could be 10A, at least 9B for physicality then 9A for vehicles and certain gadgets
 
It's a composite movie version, the games were not considered if i recall. Laslty i do not see feats on the 9-B range since electric canisters and rifle shots are just 9-C.
 
Dark649 said:
It's a composite movie version, the games were not considered if i recall. Laslty i do not see feats on the 9-B range since electric canisters and rifle shots are just 9-C.
Ah well if games aren't considered than fair enough.

The electric canisters are from everything or nothing. Bond fights Jaws on a train. Jaws is a 9B and he is able to throw these canisters and his strength had wall level power. Bond was able to push and punch Jaws into these canisters which KO'ed him. So GAME bond should be 9B. I was merely suggesting that Craig's Bond should be comparable to him as he has been shown to much stronger than the other Bonds. His durability feat in Skyfall was him getting shot off a massive bridge, after a rifle shot and into hard as concrete water. This bond also took down a highly trained agent other highly trained men, similar to Game Bond.

So either we use the game feats in this and then scale

Or we have two seperate profiles

Because Craig Bond isn't 10A. Especially if we use Bourne for example. He is 9C for beating highly trained people with nothing. Connery the weakest bond does that and he is 10A after beating oddjob. It's just a bit inconsistent. 10A Connery I agree with, but Craig is clearly superior physically and should be 9C at least
 
Stop quoting walls of text.

Either tag the member you're replying to:

@Member

Or delete the wall of text you quote and leave behind only:

"Member Wrote"
 
Soldier Blue said:
Stop quoting walls of text.

Either tag the member you're replying to:

@Member

Or delete the wall of text you quote and leave behind only:

"Member Wrote"
Ok sorry. Doesn't really mean anything though. I guess I'll stop that?
 
It's not a rule violation or anything. It's just that quoting long walls of text clutters the thread. It also takes longer to load, and some of us have shitty internet connections.
 
Soldier Blue said:
It's not a rule violation or anything. It's just that quoting long walls of text clutters the thread. It also takes longer to load, and some of us have shitty internet connections.
Ahh ok I see. Sorry then
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top