- 5,637
- 3,655
We don't have space manipulation. Only spatial and dimensional manipulation
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently i made it upWhat is space manipulation? I never heard of it
Arguably they are subsets of each other. As the page currently clarifies dimensional manipulation is supposed to be about manipulating higher (or lower) dimensions specifically, while 99.9% of regular spatial manipulations users do it on their own dimensionality.Also, what makes Dimensional Manipulation distinctive from Spatial Manipulation?
I requested this, but I assume Ant does not like the idea@DontTalkDT Coolio, btw is it possible for the Higher dimensional users category to change to Dimensional Users since the name is changed?
Okay. That is probably fine then. I trust your sense of judgement.Arguably they are subsets of each other. As the page currently clarifies dimensional manipulation is supposed to be about manipulating higher (or lower) dimensions specifically, while 99.9% of regular spatial manipulations users do it on their own dimensionality.
Manipulating higher/lower dimensions has unique notable applications, justifying the power.
What I considered, though, is if we should add as application that manipulating higher/lower dimensional objects likewise qualifies. Purpose being that there are 3D characters that can manipulate (sometimes not tiering applicable) higher dimensional objects and the power to do that needs a name as well and this seems well suited in principle. (e.g. I know a 8-B character that can lift and throw 4D hypercubes)
@DontTalkDT@DontTalkDT Coolio, btw is it possible for the Higher dimensional users category to change to Dimensional Users since the name is changed?
Wouldn't "Dimension Users" be the correct grammar? Aside from that I generally don't mind.@DontTalkDT Coolio, btw is it possible for the Higher dimensional users category to change to Dimensional Users since the name is changed?
^ Everyone ok with that?What I considered, though, is if we should add as application that manipulating higher/lower dimensional objects likewise qualifies. Purpose being that there are 3D characters that can manipulate (sometimes not tiering applicable) higher dimensional objects and the power to do that needs a name as well and this seems well suited in principle. (e.g. I know a 8-B character that can lift and throw 4D hypercubes)
This seems fine to me, but it should preferably be "Limited Dimensional Manipulation" in my view.What I considered, though, is if we should add as application that manipulating higher/lower dimensional objects likewise qualifies. Purpose being that there are 3D characters that can manipulate (sometimes not tiering applicable) higher dimensional objects and the power to do that needs a name as well and this seems well suited in principle. (e.g. I know a 8-B character that can lift and throw 4D hypercubes)
Can somebody link to our current wiki category for higher-dimensional manipulation users please?
That's true. That alone would be very limited.This seems fine to me, but it should preferably be "Limited Dimensional Manipulation" in my view.
Thank you. I only checked "Higher Dimensional Manipulation Users" and did not receive a good result via our wiki's internal category search function. My bad.Higher-Dimensional Manipulation Users
vsbattles.fandom.com
Thank you. It seems like we have reached an agreement then.That's true. That alone would be very limited.
That was my suggestion thoThank you. I only checked "Higher Dimensional Manipulation Users" and did not receive a good result via our wiki's internal category search function. My bad.
Should we update it to "Dimensional Manipulation Users" instead then?
That sounds good.Should we update it to "Dimensional Manipulation Users" instead then?
WouldThank you. It seems like we have reached an agreement then.
be ok to put on the page then?Characters who can just move or otherwise physically handle higher or lower dimensional objects can recieve "limited Dimensional Manipulation".
Well, me agreeing with it should likely not be a problem.That was my suggestion tho
Dimensional Manipulation Users sounds considerably better as a category title, yes.Dimension users sound awful. Dimensional Manipulation User sounds substantially.
Thank you.That sounds good.
Yes, but we should capitalise the "L" in "Limited".Would
be ok to put on the page then?
Sure thing. I have added it with the capitalized L.Yes, but we should capitalise the "L" in "Limited".
Can this be closed?I believe we are done here.