- 61,177
- 14,747
Im confused as to what is being argued here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not even most of Gintama's jokes. You really think those two less that 15min videos represents all of Gintama's jokes?Livinmeme said:also i was saying that most of his jokes are referencial not refering to the serious arcDragonmasterxyz said:You realize that only you look like an idiot here. I never said Gintama was a totally serious series. Gintama is a gag series with serious arcs (more than 5 btw). Gintama's gags are also not only parodies. Try again.
EDIT: @Everyone else, like I said, arguing against Livinmeme doesn't seem to be productive, and we've reached a strong consensus otherwise. So can we focus on the RvB discussion?Cropfist said:>focus on blood gulch and spartan armor
>established in Halo timeline
>covenant
>reference to forerunners
>UNSC
>"it's completely original with few halo references"
actually it might be closer to SMG4 which has mario stuff but also original characters and storyline
no first is the history second are the jokes and third are the references who are that manyZaratthustra said:Gintama is an original manga/anime with an original cast of character, original arcs, original story. This is not a fanfiction.
8Bit uses FF characters, plot stories but at the same time it changes some of their personalities and adding other key points same like a novel on Fanfiction.net. This isn't an original story that debuted with original cast and plot.
Original characters, original storyline, very few references to actual halo, and officially lisenced by microsoft in some capacity as RT is allowed to legally sell it on DVD and stream it on netflixThe pen or the sword said:Eight bit is already nuked due to being a fanfiction of final fantasy/being purely fannon. We simply wish to know what differentiates red vs blue from halo.
also do you know that most of the time they create there own adventures the history in the begining is similar but then become pretty diferentLivinmeme said:no first is the history second are the jokes and third are the references who are that manyZaratthustra said:Gintama is an original manga/anime with an original cast of character, original arcs, original story. This is not a fanfiction.
8Bit uses FF characters, plot stories but at the same time it changes some of their personalities and adding other key points same like a novel on Fanfiction.net. This isn't an original story that debuted with original cast and plot.
Selling something shouldn't be, but being licensed by the original property holders should be, imo, if Weekly can cite a source for that we should be golden.The pen or the sword said:Hmm sounds good, though id say it being sold/liscensed isn't really a criteria for it being allowed. As Ive stated before selling something isn't a deciding factor in qaulifying something as fannon or not.
If this is referring to Gintama then you only prove that you've only looked at a few episodes scattered about. Just stop talking, you are speaking nonsense and are merely showing how ignorant you are of the material you are using as an example.Livinmeme said:no first is the history second are the jokes and third are the references who are that many
Weekly hasn't been a bureaucrat for a while not that that holds any relevance...Livinmeme said:well weekly a borucrate say that is not a fan fic if is lincenced of has certain amount of products
okay i din´t explaing good but a joke in the series is that they tried to make something similar to the history of FF but then beging something absulote stupid i beg you at least read a litle of the series and you know that series is weird with his argumentThe pen or the sword said:Hmm sounds good, though id say it being sold/liscensed isn't really a criteria for it being allowed. As Ive stated before selling something isn't a deciding factor in qaulifying something as fannon or not.
fair enough if it's liscensed it should be enough, Im just a bit fried atm aplogies.Agnaa said:Selling something shouldn't be, but being licensed by the original property holders should be, imo, if Weekly can cite a source for that we should be golden.
well they sold things after but now the creator is focus in other projcetsThe pen or the sword said:fair enough if it's liscensed it should be enough, Im just a bit fried atm aplogies.Agnaa said:Selling something shouldn't be, but being licensed by the original property holders should be, imo, if Weekly can cite a source for that we should be golden.
no my point that is technically legal by free use so he can say and free use can be used if is a parody so yeah even legally is acepted as a parody and i don´t think you can change thatAgnaa said:@Livinmeme But the rights holders didn't sell those things. Show me where Nintendo or Square Enix has sold 8-Bit Theater stuff, then you'd have a point.
Red vs Blue is the kind of thing that originated as a parody video series of Halo that uses Halo as the engine for its production that later on in the series started using original animation with a whole team.Elizhaa said:In my view, since 8-Bit Theater and Red vs Blue are fanon from what I read, the verse pages should be deleted; the pages can move be to FC/OC or other wiki were they are acceptable.
but 8BIT legally sendThe pen or the sword said:Look I'm sure english isn't your first language but can you please take a bit more time with your post they can be a bit difficult to decipher.
Something can be a parody and still be fanfiction as stated before.
Since it seems red vs blue doesn't have the same issues as eight bit theater I guess this would be fine to close.
free use weeklyWeeklyBattles said:Where is 8bit stated to be officially licensed by all the companies that it uses sprites from in its story?
Im 99% sur that Final Fantasy is not public domainLivinmeme said:free use weekly