• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Infinite Zamasu and God's Revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
The standards say in order to be AE: you have to embody a concept, thought or information.
The statements give us thought, mind and will and those all fall under the requirements for AE
 
And explain to me why the living **** a statement from the people who literally make the show isn't reliable, explain to me how in the **** thoughts, wills, emotions which fall under the requirements to have AE, yet Zamasu's will, thought and mind isn't enough when literal two translations, and statement from the writers states that it's his will, thought, mind is engulfing the universe, and all of these fall under requirements for having AE, yet somehow he doesn't qualify-
 
I am sorry that the standards for having AE is embodying a will, thought or mind allows Zamasu to have AE which multiple translations and writers themselves say that it's his will, mind and thoughts
 
I'm going off the page for Abstract Existence, fam. The way I saw the scene was that Trunks cuts Zamasu, destroys his body and Zamasu's soul/will lives on as Infinite/Mugen Zamasu, who has Type 1 AE.

Trunks destroying Zamasu's soul with the Sword of Hope wasn't really a factor.
The page for Abstract Existence also states that just being the embodiment of something is not enough to get it. They need feats or reliable statements proving that the concept they represent grants them Immortality/Regeneration or control over the abstraction. So far Infinite Zamasu has shown no feats proving it being the embodiment of Zamasu's will has been granted any for of Immortality/Regeneration, or control over abstraction.
 
The page for Abstract Existence also states that just being the embodiment of something is not enough to get it. They need feats or reliable statements proving that the concept they represent grants them Immortality/Regeneration or control over the abstraction. So far Infinite Zamasu has shown no feats proving it being the embodiment of Zamasu's will has been granted any for of Immortality/Regeneration, or control over abstraction.

it's literally his will, thoughts, and lastly mind
 
The page for Abstract Existence also states that just being the embodiment of something is not enough to get it. They need feats or reliable statements proving that the concept they represent grants them Immortality/Regeneration or control over the abstraction.
''Embodying a concept is not enough to obtain this ability, an abstract needs feats or reliable statements proving that the concept they represent grants them Immortality/Regeneration or control over the abstraction.''

1-Infinite Zamasu is Zamasu will and its stated by Reliable Sources, and this part is about CONCEPT, because CONCEPT have controls over the things that relies on it, but Infinite Zamasu Abstract Existence is not Conceptual.
 
Also zamasu's will engulfed the universe, made some laughing sounds and shoots energy beams, and it was going to engulfing even the present timeline, showing that he is literally in control of what's happening
 
People arguing against AE Infinite Zamasu have nothing aside from the whole premise of conceptual????. Like what, you guys called us cherry-picking word, while at the same time you guys also cherry-picking the Conceptual word to debunk the CRT, but we don't even use the Law and Justice concept thing to make him AE
 
Arguments against AE: It's not his will.
No it is his will, even if you disagree we have two translations that states that it's his mind/thoughts.
It's merly flowery language and nothing else: so the writers, two translations states the same thing, yet it's flowery language? Actually remind me when dbz is full of hyperbole claims besides "I'm fastest, I am strongest" also please prove that it is actually flowery language.
He needs to embody his will: fused zamasu with the universe is literally his will, mind/thoughts my guy.
He needs to embody a concept: nope, not really, the standard states he needs to embody concepts, thoughts or information which he actually falls into so no, he has the requirements for having AE.
Statements aren't reliable: actually they are, they're not just coming from a character in the show or the narrator. It's the writers, the official cite of the company that makes Dragonball, thus actually giving them the highest authority and they should be considered the most trust worthy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top