- 191
- 52
What exactly is the change that will occur?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the universe is infiniteWhat exactly is the change that will occur?
Kaioshin Kingdom returning to being a Universal-sized space-time, everything returning to normal as usual, 3 Universal sized space-time and adding the velocity later, due to some calculations i was told.What exactly is the change that will occur?
Arguments for Buu Saga might also start rising upthe universe is infinite
thus characters get infinite speed for traversing it
well we don't currently take the universal statements anyway, so this won't happen until another crtArguments for Buu Saga might also start rising up
I didn’t say the upgrades would happen in this thread, I only said arguments for it will start upso this won't happen until another crt
Goku solosWhat exactly is the change that will occur?
False analogy ahh fallacyour Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.
I mean one of the scans mentions that there is darkness that stretches infinitely beyond the universe. For all we know the observable universe could be in reference to the space of the universe that is illuminated by light, albeit contradicting infinite galaxies.Why would it be any different in DBS?
Guides also say that the universe in beyond human comprehension, thus Bulma's view on the matter isn't validThis makes zero sense. They'd be at the center of the observable universe, since, you know, that observable universe is based around the observer.
IRL, our Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.
Why would it be any different in DBS?
This makes zero sense. They'd be at the center of the observable universe, since, you know, that observable universe is based around the observer.
IRL, our Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.
Why would it be any different in DBS?
damage's point is that we observe the universe from our planet, thus we're the center of the observable partNo. The Earth isn't the center of the living universe. People used to think that way a long time ago iirc the theory was called geocentric , but we've learned a lot since then. We're just one planet circling the Sun, which is just one star in a galaxy full of them. And our galaxy is just one of millions if not billions in the universe. The universe is expanding in every direction, so there's no actual center every point kind of looks like the center from it s own perspective. It's like being in an infinite field with no specific middle point
The observer here (bulma) can only observe what they can possibly see and analyse thus the observer in question is not reliable as they have spoken on a matter they have no knowledge and are inconsistent when compared to other more reliable sources. (Which the blog has proven)This makes zero sense. They'd be at the center of the observable universe, since, you know, that observable universe is based around the observer.
IRL, our Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.
Why would it be any different in DBS?
What do you think my point is?I'm sorry damage but what even is your point.
To be fair your point doesn’t contradict the thread in any way, it’s based on a false analogy that contains a single pointWhat do you think my point is?
If you can't understand it from my post, I'm having a hard time thinking how I could rephrase it for you.
fr the nitpicking go crazyTo be fair your point doesn’t contradict the thread in any way, it’s based on a false analogy that contains a single pointinstead of the central argument
There is no analogy in my post other than what the blog post has presented.To be fair your point doesn’t contradict the thread in any way, it’s based on a false analogy that contains a single pointinstead of the central argument
yesthe amount of statements coming from omniscient sources outweighs a human character's statement in my opinion