『INFINITE UNIVERSE IN DRAGON BALL SUPER』

[Baabasaplar95]

What exactly is the change that will occur?

 

[Sus]

What exactly is the change that will occur?

the universe is infinite
thus characters get infinite speed for traversing it

 

[Remus1998]

Agreed

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

What exactly is the change that will occur?

Kaioshin Kingdom returning to being a Universal-sized space-time, everything returning to normal as usual, 3 Universal sized space-time and adding the velocity later, due to some calculations i was told.

 

[Ednaxel2]

the universe is infinite
thus characters get infinite speed for traversing it

Arguments for Buu Saga might also start rising up

 

[Sus]

Arguments for Buu Saga might also start rising up

well we don't currently take the universal statements anyway, so this won't happen until another crt

 

[Ednaxel2]

so this won't happen until another crt

I didn’t say the upgrades would happen in this thread, I only said arguments for it will start up

 

[Sus]

fair

 

[Kroneii1]

What exactly is the change that will occur?

Goku solos

 

[Damage3245]

"Bulma stated the universe has an edge and a center". People like to use this as one of the debunks for infinite dragon ball universe, but it has a couple of problems. First off, bulma could just be talking about the observable universe

This makes zero sense. They'd be at the center of the observable universe, since, you know, that observable universe is based around the observer.

IRL, our Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.

Why would it be any different in DBS?

 

[LordDestroit10K]

our Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.

False analogy ahh fallacy

 

[Robo432343]

agree

 

[RanHover60]

Why would it be any different in DBS?

I mean one of the scans mentions that there is darkness that stretches infinitely beyond the universe. For all we know the observable universe could be in reference to the space of the universe that is illuminated by light, albeit contradicting infinite galaxies.

 

[omegabronic]

This makes zero sense. They'd be at the center of the observable universe, since, you know, that observable universe is based around the observer.

IRL, our Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.

Why would it be any different in DBS?

Guides also say that the universe in beyond human comprehension, thus Bulma's view on the matter isn't valid

 

[AizenBankai09]

This makes zero sense. They'd be at the center of the observable universe, since, you know, that observable universe is based around the observer.

IRL, our Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.

Why would it be any different in DBS?

No. The Earth isn't the center of the living universe. People used to think that way a long time ago iirc the theory was called geocentric , but we've learned a lot since then. We're just one planet circling the Sun, which is just one star in a galaxy full of them. And our galaxy is just one of millions if not billions in the universe. The universe is expanding in every direction, so there's no actual center every point kind of looks like the center from it s own perspective. It's like being in an infinite field with no specific middle point

 

[Sus]

No. The Earth isn't the center of the living universe. People used to think that way a long time ago iirc the theory was called geocentric , but we've learned a lot since then. We're just one planet circling the Sun, which is just one star in a galaxy full of them. And our galaxy is just one of millions if not billions in the universe. The universe is expanding in every direction, so there's no actual center every point kind of looks like the center from it s own perspective. It's like being in an infinite field with no specific middle point

damage's point is that we observe the universe from our planet, thus we're the center of the observable part

we are of course not the center of the entire thing

 

[Elyartaker]

I'm sorry damage but what even is your point.
as they said, false analogy in the worst way possible.

This makes zero sense. They'd be at the center of the observable universe, since, you know, that observable universe is based around the observer.

IRL, our Earth is the center of the observable universe because that's where we're observing from.

Why would it be any different in DBS?

The observer here (bulma) can only observe what they can possibly see and analyse thus the observer in question is not reliable as they have spoken on a matter they have no knowledge and are inconsistent when compared to other more reliable sources. (Which the blog has proven)

 

[Damage3245]

Guys, I don't need six different profile to me at once on this.

 

[omegabronic]

Yeah, if you saw someone saying the point already, just don't answer, less clog = better

 

[Damage3245]

I'm sorry damage but what even is your point.

What do you think my point is?

If you can't understand it from my post, I'm having a hard time thinking how I could rephrase it for you.

 

[LordDestroit10K]

What do you think my point is?

If you can't understand it from my post, I'm having a hard time thinking how I could rephrase it for you.

To be fair your point doesn’t contradict the thread in any way, it’s based on a false analogy that contains a single point instead of the central argument

 

[TheGreatBanana]

Agree with the thread. Seems balant to me.

 

[Robo432343]

To be fair your point doesn’t contradict the thread in any way, it’s based on a false analogy that contains a single point instead of the central argument

fr the nitpicking go crazy

 

[Damage3245]

To be fair your point doesn’t contradict the thread in any way, it’s based on a false analogy that contains a single point instead of the central argument

There is no analogy in my post other than what the blog post has presented.

 

[Sus]

the amount of statements coming from omniscient sources outweighs a human character's statement in my opinion

 

[Greatsage13th]

the amount of statements coming from omniscient sources outweighs a human character's statement in my opinion

yes

 

[MintyBoi1]

Agreeing with this