Hyperverse ambiguous of SCP-682 and other characters of SCPverse

[Enigma_Star]

SK ?

 

[Agnaa]

SK = Scarlet King.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Scarlet King

 

[Enigma_Star]

So what you are insinuating is that the SCPverse does not have a canon per se, and that all creatures with a minimum of continuity in the stories depicted in the Foundation are guns between them ? Seriously ?

 

[Enigma_Star]

It still seems absurd that a work does not have real guns, in the background, I find ...

 

[Agnaa]

So what you are insinuating is that the SCPverse does not have a canon per se, and that all creatures with a minimum of continuity in the stories depicted in the Foundation are guns between them ? Seriously ?

??????

The SCPverse does have a canon.

I have no idea what you mean by "all creatures with a minimum of continuity in the stories depicted in the Foundation are guns between them", I don't understand what those words mean.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

SCP does indeed have a canon

 

[Enigma_Star]

In my previous comment, by "all creatures with a minimum of continuity in the stories depicted in the Foundation are guns between them", I heard that as I understood that the SCPverse had no real canon established according to you, all creatures respecting at least the previously established stories were therefore considered "cannons" for the rest ƒñÀÔÖÇ´©Å

 

[Enigma_Star]

So the SCPverse does have an original canon, as I thought ...

Where does one of my initial questions lie, what are the stories of the characters currently considered Hyperverse as canons to the aforementioned narratives? Because you do not establish and do not consider a real canon and then say that the pour still has one, so it can be confusing ...

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Enigma We already posted them

 

[Enigma_Star]

The two links that Agnaa posted and the one you posted yourself show, according to your account, only where the various SCP and creatures currently Hyperverse are related, not if the stories in question are downright compatible and valid with the canon initially established by the Foundation ...

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Theyre all interconnected my dude

 

[Enigma_Star]

Nah, but because you have fanfictions non-guns who follow the continuity of the works of canons they are inspired

 

[Enigma_Star]

So I really prefer to be sure about the veracity of some information ...

 

[Agnaa]

Where does one of my initial questions lie, what are the stories of the characters currently considered Hyperverse as canons to the aforementioned narratives? Because you do not establish and do not consider a real canon and then say that the pour still has one, so it can be confusing ...

We have terms on this website when dealing with SCP. "Original Canon" and "Extended Canon". "Original Canon" are (essentially, it's a little bit more complicated) things that were written by the original author. While "Extended Canon" are things written by any author that are still consistent with how the character's usually portrayed.

The hyperversal characters mostly don't have an "Original Canon" due to it being scattered over so many authors, but they have a consistent "Extended Canon".

 

[Enigma_Star]

So they are canons, said extended, which agree in some way with the original guns, said ... original ?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

What do you mean by guns?

 

[Agnaa]

Sure.

 

[Enigma_Star]

Otherwise, I did not have so much the definition of what were "original" and "extended" canons concerning the SCPverse (Even if "original" is a little obvious, when one thinks about it) ... thanks for the blow for this pipe ...

 

[Enigma_Star]

A simple typing error, I'm talking about the canon we've been talking about since just now ...

 

[Agnaa]

What do you mean by guns?

Enigma seems to primarily speak French, so perhaps they're using google translate to translate our posts, and perhaps google translate sometimes turns "canon" into "gun"?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Oooooooh i see now

But yeah Agnaa is correct, theyre separated into article and extended canon because of this, similar to how we treat Star Wars

 

[Hykuu]

It was Mr. Shapey. But his SCP profile is deleted now don't know why.
Edit: Apparently the author wasn't happy with it and he had rewritte it.

I looked up mr shapey and got a bit confused since he wasn't popping up, thanks for clarifiying

 

[Enigma_Star]

Indeed, I am mainly French and helps me with Google Translate, I did not notice at once this translation of "canon" in "gun" ...

Otherwise, by my relatively average English in general, I do not know where to begin to document the canons of the blow "extended" SCPverse, hence my thread here ...

 

[Dargoo_Faust]

The idea that there is no canon is a bit silly at times. It's not that we don't have any. It's that we have a multitude which touch, cross, and dip into each other. It's up to you, as the reader, to decide what you believe and what you embrace as the heart of the universe. That doesn't mean, though, that authors lack intent or design, and collaboration is the heart of innovation.
	~ Canon Hub​

 

[Enigma_Star]

I have already seen this sentence on the site, but it does seem to prove non-canon and just means that it can not be considered as canon to the original canon

 

[Dargoo_Faust]

I have already seen this sentence on the site, but it does seem to prove non-canon and just means that it can not be considered as canon to the original cano

How dows it prove non-canon? It outright says that the idea of there being no canon is silly.

It just confirms there are more than one, but even then they overlap in many places.