- 19,530
- 3,924
So which Option do you guys prefer?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not, many verses do in fact erase beyond existence and non-existence, WoD, SMT, I believe even TES does it as well.Antoniofer said:One thing is erase some that is 1-A (that despite transcend the duality of existence and nonexistence, is still in an state of being that can be reduced to not existing [theorically speaking]), but erasing someone beyond nonexistence is absurd, as NE is already the lowest point of not existing.
Well, non-existent characters "existent" in the same way 0 makes up 1.Antoniofer said:Yes, I believe TES have Zero-Sum, and I guess with D&D refer to the Last Word, but even nonexistence characters exist in some way; is matter of definitions, not that I disagree with the power of these beings, they could be called "beyond NE", but if it still fit the conventional definition of NE, is still NE.
Achully >: [ Iiiiii came up with the idea mooooonthe aguuuu MmmmmmMr. Bambu said:Udl put his name on my Regenerationn suggestion ree
I do agree it is extreme, but it is supposed to be, as you get higher up it should be logical to assume that less things should appear, because it's getting more and more absurd, much like our own tiering System.Overlord775 said:I think that going with narrative erasure for True Godly is too restricting, as like only 5-6 verses would even have it
Mr. Bambu said:super crazy coincidence that the last thread that had my proposition was written up months ago, eh?
Damn I concede, I'm clearly outclassed.Mr. Bambu said:I wrote up regen revisions from the womb, scammer get scammed
In case it wasn't painfully obvious, I still stand by my proposition from the last thread, designated here as "A".