• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(Gurren Lagann 1-A/ H1-A+ upgrade) Don’t believe in yourself. Believe in the upgrade that believes in you!

I am asking you to explain why "dimension" as a term should mean something completely different (R>F gap) than what it is usually treated as (literal mathematical axis).

You can't have both of these interpretations at the same time for your own convenience in scaling the verse. They're inherently contradictory.

At the moment, their mathematical definition is what is most supported. Gurren Laggan is more direct about how it treats dimensions than most other verses.

For R>F to be accepted, ya gotta explain why "2D" doesn't actually mean 2D in a literal sense in that piece of the verse.

If you can't give a solid enough reasoning, this CRT fails.
Here. Is this what you're looking for or something else?
 
Btw isn't this thread supposed to be on the hub? Shouldn't it have been locked and then reviewed by Ultima?
 
anyway i agree with 1-B and 1-A but imo the way it should be done is:
dai gurren and AntiSpiral stay at High 1-C
Spiral Nemesis and Post Apotheosis Simon can maybe get 1-B
Avant Simon has a 1-B and 1-A keys pre ascension and post ascension
Otoko Simon gets 1-A
 
anyway i agree with 1-B and 1-A but imo the way it should be done is:
dai gurren and AntiSpiral stay at High 1-C
Spiral Nemesis and Post Apotheosis Simon can maybe get 1-B
Avant Simon has a 1-B and 1-A keys pre ascension and post ascension
Otoko Simon gets 1-A
Wasnt 20D from anti spirals attack?
 
anyway i agree with 1-B and 1-A but imo the way it should be done is:
dai gurren and AntiSpiral stay at High 1-C
Spiral Nemesis and Post Apotheosis Simon can maybe get 1-B
Avant Simon has a 1-B and 1-A keys pre ascension and post ascension
Otoko Simon gets 1-A
Post-Apotheosis Simon was still below the Anti-Spiral, though, and only overpowered the Anti-Spiral at the end of their fight.

Not to mention that the Otoko drama CD takes place within the Multiversal Labyrinth because Simon viewed the cast of the Otoko universe after he wakes up from the Labyrinth in the manga.

With all that being said, it makes no sense for the Anti-Spiral to stay at High 1-C; they should get bumped up to 1-B/1-A as well.
 
If at all possible, do you think you can link the FAQ here?

then that is substantial evidence for a Reality-Fiction Transcendence, in particular if the higher plane demonstrably has its own set of dimensions, so that it is impossible for it and the lower world to be related to each other by dimensional differences.
TTGL explicitly has something like this in it’s cosmology.
 
I don't think so. But since the proposal is for High 1-A you'd need them anyways.
Alright.

What do you think about 1-A based on the evidence brought up since? The r>f faq says a higher plane having its own set of dimensions is great evidence, as it sufficiently proves the planes aren’t tied to a dimensional hierarchy.
 
The most I see from this is a 1-B upgrade. 1-A and High 1-A still don't work for me and I don't agree with the logic presented as R>F.
Yea, 1-B is undeniable at this point.

also, may i ask why 1-A doesnt work for you? A plane having a different set of dimensions is directly said to be good justification for the difference not being quantitive in nature.

could you mention ultima? im pretty sure he wrote the FAQ, so i would like to see his thoughts on this.
 
also, may i ask why 1-A doesnt work for you? A plane having a different set of dimensions is directly said to be good justification for the difference not being quantitive in nature.
Despite the arguments presented I don't see the sets of dimensional axis being separated in a R>F fashion from the CD verse to the Anti-Spiral space.
could you mention ultima?
Sure but they're generally pretty busy: @Ultima_Reality
 
Back
Top